Xiaomi 12S vs Oppo Find X5 Pro: A Detailed Comparison of Flagship Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 12S offers a compelling value proposition. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset delivers superior thermal performance and efficiency compared to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in the Find X5 Pro, translating to sustained performance during demanding tasks. While the Find X5 Pro boasts a brighter display, the 12S’s performance edge makes it the winner for power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi 12S | Oppo Find X5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 04 | 2022, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 07 | Available. Released 2022, March 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or eco leather back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 152.7 x 69.9 x 8.2 mm or 8.7 mm | 163.7 x 73.9 x 8.5 or 8.8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 179 g / 182 g (6.31 oz) | 218 g or 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~89.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1100 nits (peak) | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - GlobalOcta-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - China |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - GlobalMediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) - China |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 - GlobalMali-G710 MC10 - China |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Leica lens, color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 15mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), AF | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS (3-axis sensor-shift, 2-axis lens-shift) 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Oppo Find X5 Pro Dimensity model has no MariSilicon X image chip, 5-axis OIS and Hasselblad’s color calibration | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 42 min 50W wireless, 100% in 57 min 10W reverse wireless | 80W wired, PD, 50% in 12 min 50W wireless, 100% in 47 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, White, Purple, Green | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White, Blue (eco leather) |
| Models | 2206123SC | PFEM10, CPH2305, PFFM20 |
| Price | About 570 EUR | € 449.00 / $ 430.24 / £ 1,049.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.7 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1012896 (v9) GeekBench: 3433 (v5.1) GFXBench: 44fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi 12S
- Superior chipset efficiency (Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1)
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Competitive charging speeds (67W wired, 50W wireless)
- Display details are limited
- Camera specs are not fully disclosed
Oppo Find X5 Pro
- Brighter display (762 nits)
- Faster wired charging (80W)
- Potentially more refined camera software
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 can throttle under sustained load
- Chipset varies by region (Dimensity 9000 in China)
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X5 Pro’s display boasts a measured peak brightness of 762 nits, offering excellent visibility in bright sunlight. While the Xiaomi 12S’s peak brightness isn’t specified, the Find X5 Pro’s advantage is clear in direct sunlight scenarios. Both displays feature an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, providing deep blacks and vibrant colors. However, the 12S’s display technology isn’t detailed, making it difficult to assess its LTPO capabilities for adaptive refresh rates, a feature likely present in the Find X5 Pro to further optimize power consumption.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are advertised as having strong photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. The Oppo Find X5 Pro likely benefits from Oppo’s established image processing pipeline and potentially larger sensor sizes, though this is speculative without specific details. The Xiaomi 12S, while capable, may rely more on software optimization to compete. The absence of details regarding sensor sizes and lens apertures makes a definitive camera comparison difficult, but the Find X5 Pro’s brand reputation suggests a more polished camera experience, particularly in challenging lighting conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 12S utilizes the Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm), while the Oppo Find X5 Pro features the SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) globally, and the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (4nm) in China. The ‘+’ in the 8+ Gen 1 signifies a mid-cycle refresh with improved efficiency and clock speeds. Specifically, the 12S’s CPU configuration (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710, 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) offers a slight clock speed advantage over the Find X5 Pro’s global variant (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710, 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510). The Dimensity 9000 variant in China has slightly higher A710 clocks (2.85 GHz) but the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s architectural improvements generally lead to better sustained performance and thermal management. Both phones utilize LPDDR5 RAM, but the 12S’s more efficient chipset will likely result in less RAM throttling under heavy load.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve a respectable endurance rating of 101 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the 12S). However, charging speeds are a key differentiator. The Oppo Find X5 Pro boasts 80W wired charging, reaching 50% in just 12 minutes, while the Xiaomi 12S offers 67W wired charging, taking 42 minutes for a full charge. Wireless charging is comparable at 50W for both, with the Find X5 Pro completing a full charge in 47 minutes versus the 12S’s 57 minutes. The Find X5 Pro’s faster wired charging provides a significant convenience advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi 12S if you prioritize sustained gaming performance, efficient power usage, and a more responsive user experience. It’s ideal for mobile gamers, power users, and those who frequently engage in resource-intensive tasks. Buy the Oppo Find X5 Pro if you value a brighter, more visually striking display, and a potentially more refined camera experience (depending on region and software tuning), and are willing to trade some sustained performance for it.