Xiaomi 12S Ultra vs Xiaomi 12T Pro: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi 12S Ultra shines with its exceptional camera system and slightly brighter display, while the 12T Pro boasts incredibly fast 120W charging and a more streamlined design. For photography enthusiasts, the Ultra is the clear winner; for those prioritizing speed and value, the 12T Pro takes the crown.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi 12S Ultra | Xiaomi 12T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 75 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 04 | 2022, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 09 | Available. Released 2022, October 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), eco leather back, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 75 x 9.1 mm (6.43 x 2.95 x 0.36 in) | 163.1 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 225 g (7.94 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lenses, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 0.7µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/4.1, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 128˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF TOF 3D, (depth) | 200 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.22", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@3840fps, gyro-EIS, Dolby Vision HDR 10-bit rec. (4K, 1080p) | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 0.7µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.47", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | Tuned by Harman Kardon 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 41 min 50W wireless, 100% in 52 min 10W reverse wireless | 120W wired, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4860 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Dark Green | Black, Silver, Blue |
| Models | 2203121C | 22081212UG, 22081212G |
| Price | $ 288.00 | $ 208.76 / € 167.62 |
| SAR | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 1.07 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 93h | Endurance rating 91h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) | -24.1 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 1039412 (v9) GeekBench: 4300 (v5.1) GFXBench: 51fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 1032185 (v9) GeekBench: 4081 (v5.1) GFXBench: 65fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| OUR TESTS | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery (old) | Endurance rating 93h | Endurance rating 91h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | 1065 nits max brightness (measured) | 913 nits max brightness (measured) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) | -24.1 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 1039412 (v9) GeekBench: 4300 (v5.1) GFXBench: 51fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 1032185 (v9) GeekBench: 4081 (v5.1) GFXBench: 65fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
- Exceptional camera system with 1-inch sensor
- Slightly brighter display
- Faster wireless charging
- Premium build quality
- Higher price
- Slower wired charging compared to 12T Pro
- Larger and heavier design
Xiaomi 12T Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging
- More affordable price
- Sleek and streamlined design
- Excellent performance
- Camera not as impressive as 12S Ultra
- Slightly dimmer display
- Potentially less robust thermal management
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent AMOLED displays with vibrant colors and deep blacks. The 12S Ultra edges out the 12T Pro with a slightly higher peak brightness of 1065 nits versus 913 nits, offering better visibility in direct sunlight. Both have a nominal infinite contrast ratio, providing excellent image clarity. The 12S Ultra's display might offer a marginally better viewing experience, but both are superb.
Camera Comparison
This is where the 12S Ultra truly distinguishes itself. It features a significantly more advanced camera system, including a massive 1-inch Sony IMX989 sensor. This results in exceptional image quality, particularly in low-light conditions, with greater detail and dynamic range. The 12T Pro's camera is still very capable, but it doesn't match the Ultra's photographic prowess. Video recording capabilities are also generally superior on the 12S Ultra.
Performance
Under the hood, both devices share the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset. However, the 12T Pro has a slightly different CPU configuration (Cortex-A510 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz vs 1.8 GHz on the 12S Ultra). In real-world usage, the difference is minimal, and both phones deliver flagship-level performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications. Thermal management will be a key factor in sustained performance, and the 12S Ultra's larger size may offer a slight advantage.
Battery Life
Both phones offer similar endurance ratings (93h vs 91h), suggesting comparable battery life in typical usage. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The 12T Pro's 120W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in just 19 minutes. The 12S Ultra's 67W charging is still fast, but takes considerably longer (41 minutes). Wireless charging is also faster on the 12S Ultra (52 min vs unknown for 12T Pro).
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi 12S Ultra is ideal for photography lovers who demand top-tier image quality and are willing to pay a premium. The Xiaomi 12T Pro is a great choice for users who want a powerful phone with blazing-fast charging and a more accessible price point, prioritizing speed and efficiency.