Xiaomi 12 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S22+: Which Android Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a polished software experience, the Samsung Galaxy S22+ is the better choice. Its 97-hour endurance rating significantly outpaces the Xiaomi 12 Pro’s 74 hours. However, the Xiaomi 12 Pro’s 120W charging is unmatched for those who value incredibly fast top-ups.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi 12 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S22+ 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G (5+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 71, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 28 | 2022, February 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 31 | Available. Released 2022, February 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 74.6 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) | 157.4 x 75.8 x 7.6 mm (6.20 x 2.98 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 204 g or 205 g (7.20 oz) | 195 g / 196 g (mmWave) (6.88 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Armor aluminum frame with tougher drop and scratch resistance (advertised) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~521 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.73 inches, 109.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.3 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1750 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) - EuropeOcta-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - ROW |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Exynos 2200 (4 nm) - EuropeQualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - ROW |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Xclipse 920 - EuropeAdreno 730 - ROW |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 48mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 70mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55" 1.4µm, Super Steady video |
| Video | 8K@24fps (HDR), 4K@30/60fps (HDR10+), 1080p@30/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm | 10 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.24", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 or 6e (market dependent), dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Virtual Proximity Sensing | Samsung DeX, Samsung Wireless DeX (desktop experience support) Bixby natural language commands and dictation Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 18 min 50W wireless, 100% in 42 min 10W reverse wireless | 45W wired, PD3.0 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Purple, Green | Phantom Black, White, Pink Gold, Green, Graphite, Sky Blue, Violet, Cream, Bora Purple |
| Models | 2201122C, 2201122G | SM-S906B, SM-S906B/DS, SM-S906U, SM-S906U1, SM-S906W, SM-S906N, SM-S9060, SM-S906E, SM-S906E/DS, SM-S906L |
| Price | € 317.40 / $ 349.99 / £ 364.66 / ₹ 41,999 | € 236.99 / $ 194.37 / £ 349.00 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) | 1.19 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | 0.57 W/kg (head) 1.40 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 74h | Endurance rating 97h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -29.5 LUFS (Average) | -26.0 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 985226 (v9) GeekBench: 3682 (v5.1) GFXBench: 46fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 722495 (v8), 886916 (v9) GeekBench: 3528 (v5.1) GFXBench: 68fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi 12 Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance (Snapdragon variant)
- 50W wireless charging
- Significantly lower battery endurance
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
- Less refined software experience compared to Samsung
Samsung Galaxy S22+ 5G
- Superior battery life (97-hour endurance)
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Mature and feature-rich One UI software
- Slower charging speeds (45W wired)
- Exynos variant may experience thermal throttling
- Less aggressive peak performance
Display Comparison
Both devices feature 'Infinite' contrast ratio displays, but the Samsung Galaxy S22+ boasts a significantly brighter panel at 1214 nits measured, compared to the Xiaomi 12 Pro’s 1050 nits. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED technology, Samsung’s displays are renowned for their color accuracy, and the S22+ likely benefits from more sophisticated calibration. The lack of specified refresh rate information for the Xiaomi 12 Pro suggests it may not match the S22+'s adaptive 120Hz capabilities, potentially impacting smoothness during scrolling and gaming.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are equipped with capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is lacking. The context data only indicates 'Photo / Video' capabilities. Given Samsung’s history, the S22+ likely prioritizes computational photography and image processing for vibrant, shareable photos. Xiaomi often focuses on delivering a more natural, true-to-life image. Without specific sensor size and aperture details, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but Samsung’s experience in image signal processing (ISP) gives it a potential advantage. The lack of mention of advanced features like 8K video recording suggests neither phone is a standout in this area.
Performance
The chipset situation is complex. The Samsung Galaxy S22+ comes in two variants: an Exynos 2200 for Europe and a Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 for the rest of the world. The Xiaomi 12 Pro exclusively uses the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. While both CPUs feature the same core configuration (1x Cortex-X2, 3x Cortex-A710, 4x Cortex-A510), the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in the Xiaomi 12 Pro has a slightly higher peak clock speed (3.00 GHz vs 2.8 GHz in the European Exynos variant). However, the Exynos 2200 has faced criticism for thermal throttling under sustained load, potentially giving the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 an edge in prolonged gaming sessions, especially in the ROW S22+ models. Both phones utilize LPDDR5 RAM, but the specific speed isn't specified, making a direct comparison difficult.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S22+ clearly wins in battery endurance with a measured 97-hour rating, significantly exceeding the Xiaomi 12 Pro’s 74 hours. This difference is despite the Xiaomi 12 Pro offering significantly faster charging: 120W wired (0-100% in 18 minutes) and 50W wireless (0-100% in 42 minutes) versus the S22+'s 45W wired and 15W wireless. The Xiaomi 12 Pro’s faster charging is a compelling feature for users who frequently need to top up quickly, but it doesn’t compensate for the S22+'s superior overall battery life. The 10W reverse wireless charging on the Xiaomi 12 Pro is also a nice-to-have, but the S22+'s 4.5W reverse wireless is less practical.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi 12 Pro if you absolutely need the fastest charging available and prioritize peak performance, even at the cost of battery life. You’ll benefit from its 120W wired and 50W wireless charging capabilities. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S22+ 5G if you value all-day battery life, a brighter and potentially more color-accurate display, and Samsung’s mature One UI software ecosystem. It’s the more practical choice for users who don’t want to constantly worry about battery percentage.