Xiaomi 12 Pro vs. Asus ROG Phone 5s Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Endurance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around performance and faster charging, the Xiaomi 12 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 offers a theoretical performance edge, and its 120W charging is significantly faster than the ROG Phone 5s Pro’s 65W. However, gamers and power users will find the ROG Phone 5s Pro’s superior battery life and optimized cooling more valuable.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi 12 Pro | Asus ROG Phone 5s Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat20 1400/150 Mbps, 5G 4 Gbps DL |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 28 | 2021, August 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 31 | Available. Released 2021, August 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 74.6 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) | 172.8 x 77.3 x 9.9 mm (6.80 x 3.04 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g or 205 g (7.20 oz) | 238 g (8.40 oz) |
| - | Pressure sensitive zones (Gaming triggers) Touch sensor; ROG Vision monochrome PMOLED display (on the back) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~521 ppi density) | 1080 x 2448 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.73 inches, 109.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ROG UI |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 512GB 18GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 48mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 11mm, 125˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@24fps (HDR), 4K@30/60fps (HDR10+), 1080p@30/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@480fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm | 24 MP, f/2.5, 27mm (wide), 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR10+ | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (2 amplifiers) |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 (side), USB Type-C 2.0 (bottom), OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 or 6e (market dependent), dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual Proximity Sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 18 min 50W wireless, 100% in 42 min 10W reverse wireless | 65W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 70% in 30 min, 100% in 52 min 10W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | Li-Po 6000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Purple, Green | Matte White |
| Models | 2201122C, 2201122G | ZS676KS |
| Price | € 317.40 / $ 349.99 / £ 364.66 / ₹ 41,999 | About 2000 EUR |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 74h | Endurance rating 110h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -29.5 LUFS (Average) | -24.0 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 985226 (v9) GeekBench: 3682 (v5.1) GFXBench: 46fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 743021 (v8), 844901 (v9) GeekBench: 14278 (v4.4), 3672 (v5.1) GFXBench: 58fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi 12 Pro
- Faster Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Significantly faster charging speeds (wired and wireless)
- Lower battery endurance
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
Asus ROG Phone 5s Pro
- Superior battery life for extended use
- Optimized thermal management for sustained gaming
- Gaming-centric features like AirTriggers
- Older Snapdragon 888+ chipset
- Dimmer display compared to the Xiaomi 12 Pro
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 12 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 1050 nits compared to the ROG Phone 5s Pro’s 840 nits. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both displays offer a smooth experience, the Xiaomi 12 Pro’s likely utilizes a more advanced panel technology, potentially including LTPO for variable refresh rate, contributing to better power efficiency. The ROG Phone 5s Pro, however, prioritizes a larger screen real estate geared towards immersive gaming, though at the cost of peak brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is limited. The Xiaomi 12 Pro is marketed as a 'Photo / Video' focused device, suggesting a strong emphasis on image quality and video recording capabilities. The ROG Phone 5s Pro, while capable, prioritizes other features. Without specific sensor size or aperture data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. However, Xiaomi’s history suggests a focus on computational photography and image processing, potentially giving it an edge in challenging lighting conditions. The ROG Phone 5s Pro’s camera is likely tuned for quick snapshots and social media sharing.
Performance
The Xiaomi 12 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) chipset represents a generational leap over the ROG Phone 5s Pro’s Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5nm). The 4nm process node offers improved thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during sustained workloads. However, the ROG Phone 5s Pro benefits from Asus’s aggressive thermal management system, including a vapor chamber and AeroActive Cooler accessory, which can maintain higher sustained performance. The CPU architecture also differs; the Xiaomi 12 Pro features the Cortex-X2 core for peak performance, while the ROG Phone 5s Pro utilizes the Cortex-X1. In real-world usage, the Xiaomi 12 Pro will likely excel in short bursts, while the ROG Phone 5s Pro may maintain more consistent performance over extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Asus ROG Phone 5s Pro clearly wins in battery endurance, achieving a measured 110 hours compared to the Xiaomi 12 Pro’s 74 hours. This substantial difference is due to the ROG Phone’s larger battery capacity and power-efficient design. While the Xiaomi 12 Pro offers incredibly fast 120W wired charging (100% in 18 minutes) and 50W wireless charging, the ROG Phone 5s Pro’s 65W wired charging (100% in 52 minutes) is still respectable. The ROG Phone 5s Pro also offers 10W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Xiaomi 12 Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi 12 Pro if you need a versatile flagship with a stunning display, incredibly fast charging, and top-tier processing power for everyday tasks and demanding applications. Buy the Asus ROG Phone 5s Pro if you prioritize extended gaming sessions, exceptional battery life, and a device specifically engineered for mobile gaming with features like AirTriggers and a robust cooling system.