Xiaomi 12 Lite vs. Poco F5: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 emerges as the clear winner, offering a significantly faster chipset, brighter display, and quicker charging. While the 12 Lite has a sleek design, the F5's performance and display advancements justify its slight price premium for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi 12 Lite | Xiaomi Poco F5 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 09 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 11 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.3 x 73.7 x 7.3 mm (6.27 x 2.90 x 0.29 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF | - |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 50% in 13 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4300 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Lite Green, Lite Pink | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | 2203129G | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | € 119.80 / $ 269.00 / £ 121.15 | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.73 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 100h | Endurance rating 118h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 528905 (v9) GeekBench: 2943 (v5.1) GFXBench: 29fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Xiaomi 12 Lite
- Sleek and stylish design
- Good display quality
- Fast charging (50% in 13 min)
- Smooth everyday performance
- Less powerful chipset than Poco F5
- Lower max brightness
- Slightly slower charging to 100%
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Significantly faster chipset (Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2)
- Brighter display
- Faster charging (100% in 46 min)
- Excellent value for money
- Design might be less premium than 12 Lite
- Potential for more aggressive image processing
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 takes a commanding lead in the display department. Its 963 nits max brightness significantly surpasses the 12 Lite's 824 nits, making it much easier to view outdoors. Both have excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), but the F5's higher brightness provides a more immersive and enjoyable viewing experience. Both likely use AMOLED panels with 120Hz refresh rates, but the F5's brightness is the key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. The 12 Lite likely focuses on natural color reproduction, while the F5 might offer more vibrant, processed images. Both likely have a main sensor around 108MP, an ultrawide lens, and a macro lens. Low-light performance is likely better on the F5 due to the more powerful processor.
Performance
The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 in the Poco F5 is a substantial upgrade over the Snapdragon 778G in the 12 Lite. The Gen 2 offers significantly improved CPU and GPU performance, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a much better gaming experience. The 12 Lite is still capable, but the F5's performance is in a different league.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 demonstrates slightly better endurance, with an endurance rating of 118h compared to the 12 Lite's 100h. While both offer 67W wired charging, the F5 charges noticeably faster, reaching 100% in 46 minutes versus the 12 Lite's 13 minutes for 50%. This faster charging is a significant advantage for the F5.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi 12 Lite is ideal for users prioritizing a stylish design and a smooth, everyday experience. It's a good choice for those who don't heavily game or demand top-tier performance. The Poco F5 is perfect for gamers, power users, and anyone who values a vibrant display and snappy performance, even if it means a slightly less premium feel.