Xiaomi 12 Lite vs. Poco F4: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F4 emerges as the overall winner thanks to its significantly more powerful Snapdragon 870 chipset and brighter display. While the 12 Lite offers a sleek design and good value, the F4's performance advantage makes it the better choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi 12 Lite | Xiaomi Poco F4 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 09 | 2022, June 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 11 | Available. Released 2022, June 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 159.3 x 73.7 x 7.3 mm (6.27 x 2.90 x 0.29 in) | 163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14.2 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF | - |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 50% in 13 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4300 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Lite Green, Lite Pink | Moonlight Silver, Night Black, Nebula Green |
| Models | 2203129G | 22021211RG, 22021211RI |
| Price | € 119.80 / $ 269.00 / £ 121.15 | ₹ 16,999 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.73 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 100h | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) | -26.1 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 528905 (v9) GeekBench: 2943 (v5.1) GFXBench: 29fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 590961 (v8), 698586 (v9) GeekBench: 3190 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi 12 Lite
- Sleek and stylish design
- Compact form factor
- Good value for money
- Smooth everyday performance
- Less powerful chipset
- Lower peak brightness display
- Slower charging
Xiaomi Poco F4
- Powerful Snapdragon 870 chipset
- Brighter display
- Faster charging
- Excellent gaming performance
- Design less refined than 12 Lite
- Potentially larger size
Display Comparison
The Poco F4 takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 1003 nits compared to the 12 Lite's 824 nits. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), but the F4's higher brightness makes it more visible in direct sunlight. Both utilize AMOLED panels, ensuring vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable camera systems, detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. Generally, the Poco F4 is expected to offer slightly better image quality, particularly in low-light conditions, due to its more powerful processor assisting image processing. Both likely feature similar primary sensor resolutions, but the F4's processing advantage gives it an edge.
Performance
Here's where the Poco F4 truly shines. Its Snapdragon 870 chipset is a substantial upgrade over the 12 Lite's Snapdragon 778G. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and significantly better gaming performance on the F4. The 870 is a flagship-level chip from a previous generation, still holding up exceptionally well.
Battery Life
Both devices offer very similar battery endurance ratings (100h vs 101h), suggesting comparable real-world battery life. The Poco F4's faster charging (100% in 38 minutes vs 50% in 13 minutes for the 12 Lite) is a significant advantage, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi 12 Lite is ideal for users prioritizing a stylish design, a smooth user experience for everyday tasks, and a slightly more compact form factor. The Xiaomi Poco F4 is perfect for gamers, power users, and those who demand top-tier performance in a mid-range price bracket.