Both the Xiaomi 11T and Poco F3 GT leverage the powerful Mediatek Dimensity 1200 chipset, but cater to slightly different priorities. The 11T aims for a well-rounded experience with a focus on display quality and endurance, while the F3 GT aggressively targets gamers with a focus on performance and rapid charging. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a brighter display, the Xiaomi 11T is the better choice. Its 98-hour endurance rating provides peace of mind, and the 798 nits peak brightness ensures excellent visibility. However, gamers will find the Poco F3 GT’s slightly faster charging and gaming-centric design more appealing.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 15 | 2021, July 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 05 | Available. Released 2021, July 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 76.9 x 8.8 mm (6.46 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | Physical pop-up gaming triggers
IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 100% in 36 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5065 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Meteorite Gray, Moonlight White, Celestial Blue | Predator Black, Gunmetal Silver |
| Models | 21081111RG | MZB09C6IN, M2104K10I |
| Price | € 119.00 / £ 275.00 | About 300 EUR |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.83 W/kg (body) | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.48 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.55 W/kg (head) 0.95 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 98h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-27.6 LUFS (Good)
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 590837 (v9)
GeekBench: 2834 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Xiaomi 11T
- Superior battery endurance (98h rating)
- Faster charging speed (36 minutes to 100%)
- Brighter display (798 nits)
- Camera specifications are unknown
- Gaming-specific features are absent
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
- Supports PD3.0 and QC3 charging protocols
- Potentially better thermal management for gaming
- Aggressive gaming-focused design
- Slower charging speed (42 minutes to 100%)
- Battery endurance is unknown, likely lower than 11T
- Display brightness data is unavailable
Display Comparison
Both phones lack detailed display specifications beyond brightness. The Xiaomi 11T boasts a measured peak brightness of 798 nits, suggesting superior outdoor visibility compared to the Poco F3 GT, for which brightness data is unavailable. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels for vibrant colors, the 11T’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage for users frequently exposed to sunlight. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio specification is a marketing term common to AMOLED displays and doesn't differentiate the two.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed with 'Photo / Video' capabilities, offering no insight into camera hardware differences. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a meaningful camera comparison is impossible. It’s reasonable to assume both phones offer competent camera systems for their price point, but neither appears to be a standout performer in this category. The absence of detail suggests neither prioritizes camera capabilities as a key selling point.
Performance
The core performance is identical: both the Xiaomi 11T and Poco F3 GT are powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6nm). This means the CPU configuration – an octa-core setup with 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – is the same. Therefore, CPU-bound tasks will perform similarly. The key difference lies in thermal management, which isn't specified. The F3 GT’s design, potentially prioritizing cooling, *could* allow for sustained peak performance during extended gaming sessions, but this is speculative without thermal testing data.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 11T claims an endurance rating of 98 hours, indicating excellent battery life. While the Poco F3 GT’s battery capacity is unknown, both phones feature 67W wired charging. However, the 11T reaches 100% charge in 36 minutes, while the F3 GT takes 42 minutes. This 6-minute difference, coupled with the 11T’s superior endurance rating, suggests the 11T offers a more efficient overall battery experience. The F3 GT’s support for PD3.0 and QC3 adds charging protocol compatibility, but doesn’t necessarily translate to faster charging speeds.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi 11T if you need a phone that reliably lasts a full day on a single charge and offers a vibrant viewing experience for everyday content consumption. Buy the Poco F3 GT if you prioritize gaming performance and want the fastest possible recharge times, even if it means slightly reduced battery endurance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Dimensity 1200 in either phone struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Dimensity 1200 is a capable chipset and can run Genshin Impact. However, sustained performance will depend on thermal management. While both phones share the same chipset, the Poco F3 GT’s design *may* prioritize cooling, potentially leading to less throttling during extended gaming sessions, but this is unconfirmed.
❓ Which phone is better for watching videos outdoors?
The Xiaomi 11T is the better choice for outdoor video viewing due to its measured peak brightness of 798 nits. This significantly improves visibility in bright sunlight compared to the Poco F3 GT, for which brightness data is unavailable.
❓ Is the difference in charging speed (36 minutes vs 42 minutes) noticeable in everyday use?
While a 6-minute difference may seem small, it can be noticeable for users who frequently top up their battery throughout the day. The Xiaomi 11T’s faster charging provides a quicker boost when you have limited time.
