Xiaomi 11T vs Xiaomi Poco F3: A Head-to-Head Showdown

Xiaomi offers a plethora of smartphones, making it tough to pick the right one. The Xiaomi 11T and Poco F3 are both compelling mid-range options, but cater to slightly different needs. This comprehensive comparison will help you determine which phone best suits your priorities.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Poco F3 emerges as the overall winner thanks to its superior Snapdragon 870 chipset, longer battery life, and faster charging. While the 11T boasts a brighter display, the F3's performance and value proposition make it the more attractive choice for most users.

PHONES
Phone Names	Xiaomi 11T	Xiaomi Poco F3

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66
5G bands	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA
Speed	HSPA, LTE, 5G	HSPA, LTE, 5G
Technology	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G

Launch
Announced	2021, September 15	2021, March 22
Status	Available. Released 2021, October 05	Available. Released 2021, March 27

Body
Build	Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, glass back	Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame
Dimensions	164.1 x 76.9 x 8.8 mm (6.46 x 3.03 x 0.35 in)	163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	203 g (7.16 oz)	196 g (6.91 oz)
	IP53, dust and splash resistant	IP53, dust and splash resistant

Display
Protection	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)
Size	6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio)	6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak)	AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak)

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)	Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585)
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm)	Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm)
GPU	Mali-G77 MC9	Adreno 650
OS	Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14	Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, HyperOS

Memory
Card slot	No	No
Internal	128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM	128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
	UFS 3.1	UFS 3.1

Main Camera
Features	Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama	Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama
Single	16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm	20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm
Triple	108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF	48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (macro), AF
Video	4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120, gyro-EIS	4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS

Selfie camera
Features	-	HDR
Single	16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm	20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm
Video	1080p@30fps	1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	No	No
35mm jack	No	No
Loudspeaker	Yes, with stereo speakers	Yes, with stereo speakers
	-	24-bit/192kHz audio

Comms
Bluetooth	5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive	5.1, A2DP, LE
Infrared port	Yes	Yes
NFC	Yes	Yes (market/region dependent)
Positioning	GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5)	GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), NavIC
Radio	No	No
USB	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass
	-	Virtual proximity sensing

Battery
Charging	67W wired, 100% in 36 min	33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 52 min
Type	Li-Po 5000 mAh	Li-Po 4520 mAh

Misc
Colors	Meteorite Gray, Moonlight White, Celestial Blue	Arctic White, Night Black, Deep Ocean Blue, Moonlight Silver
Models	21081111RG	M2012K11AG
Price	€ 119.00 / £ 275.00	€ 162.15
SAR	1.09 W/kg (head) 0.83 W/kg (body)	1.06 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body)
SAR EU	0.55 W/kg (head) 0.95 W/kg (body)	0.60 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body)

Tests
Battery life	Endurance rating 98h	Endurance rating 114h
Camera	Photo / Video	Photo / Video
Display	Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)	Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker	-27.6 LUFS (Good)	-24.5 LUFS (Very good)
Performance	AnTuTu: 590837 (v9) GeekBench: 2834 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)	AnTuTu: 631850 (v8), 697216 (v9) GeekBench: 3206 (v5.1) GFXBench: 48fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Xiaomi 11T

Brighter Display
Sleek Design
Fast Charging (67W)

Less Powerful Chipset
Shorter Battery Life
Image Processing Can Be Over-Saturated

Xiaomi Poco F3

Powerful Snapdragon 870 Chipset
Excellent Battery Life
Faster Charging (33W)
Better Value

Less Bright Display
Design Less Premium than 11T

Display Comparison

The Xiaomi 11T takes a slight edge in display brightness, reaching 798 nits compared to the Poco F3's unspecified peak brightness. Both feature AMOLED panels with excellent contrast (Infinite nominal), offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. However, the 11T's higher brightness can be beneficial in direct sunlight. The Poco F3's display is still excellent, providing a smooth viewing experience.

Camera Comparison

Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Poco F3's image processing often produces more natural-looking results. The 11T's camera tends to oversaturate colors slightly. Both offer decent video recording capabilities, but neither is a class leader. Low-light performance is comparable on both devices.

Performance

Here, the Poco F3 dominates. Its Snapdragon 870 chipset is significantly more powerful than the Dimensity 1200 in the 11T. This translates to smoother gaming, faster app loading times, and overall snappier performance. The 870 is known for its efficiency and sustained performance, making it a top choice for demanding tasks.

Battery Life

The Poco F3 shines again with its superior battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 114 hours compared to the 11T's 98 hours. This means the F3 will comfortably last a full day, even with heavy usage. The F3 also charges faster with 33W wired charging (52 minutes to 100%) compared to the 11T's 67W (36 minutes), though the difference is less significant.

Buying Guide

The Xiaomi 11T is ideal for users prioritizing a brighter display and slightly more premium design. The Poco F3 is perfect for gamers, power users, and those seeking the best performance for their money, with a focus on battery longevity.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Which phone is better for gaming?

The Poco F3 is significantly better for gaming due to its Snapdragon 870 chipset, which offers superior performance and sustained frame rates.

❓ Is the Xiaomi 11T's display worth the extra cost?

If you prioritize a brighter display for outdoor visibility, the 11T's display is an advantage. However, the Poco F3's AMOLED panel is still excellent and offers vibrant colors and deep blacks.