The mid-range 5G smartphone market is heating up, and these two contenders, the Xiaomi 11i HyperCharge 5G and the Realme Narzo 50 Pro, are vying for your attention. Both offer compelling features, but cater to slightly different needs. Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi 11i HyperCharge 5G takes the crown thanks to its blazing-fast 120W charging and exceptional battery life. While the Narzo 50 Pro offers a competitive chipset, the Xiaomi's charging speed and endurance provide a significantly better overall user experience, especially for those prioritizing quick top-ups.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 06 | 2022, May 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 12 | Available. Released 2022, May 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 76.2 x 8.3 mm (6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 160.2 x 73.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide) |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 100% in 15 min | 33W wired, 50% in 31 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Camo Green, Stealth Black, Purple Mist, Pacific Pearl | Hyper Blue, Hyper Black |
| Models | 21091116UI, MZB0A55IN | RMX3395, RMX3396 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR | 0.82 W/kg (head) 0.61 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 106h
| - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-25.2 LUFS (Very good)
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 375528 (v8), 437872 (v9)
GeekBench: 2225 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Xiaomi 11i HyperCharge 5G
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Exceptional battery life (106h endurance)
- Likely better display quality (120Hz, higher contrast)
- Potentially superior camera system (108MP main sensor)
- MIUI can be bloated
- Potentially higher price
Realme Narzo 50 Pro
- Competitive chipset (Dimensity 920)
- More affordable price
- Realme UI can be lighter and faster
- Slower 33W charging
- Less impressive battery life
- Likely inferior camera system
- Potentially lower display quality
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.67-inch FHD+ display, but the Xiaomi 11i boasts a higher refresh rate (120Hz vs Narzo's likely 120Hz or 90Hz) and a potentially better color accuracy. The Xiaomi's 'Infinite' contrast ratio claim, while nominal, suggests excellent blacks and vibrant colors. The Narzo 50 Pro's display is perfectly adequate, but lacks the premium feel of the Xiaomi.
Camera Comparison
The Xiaomi 11i typically features a triple camera setup with a 108MP main sensor, offering greater detail and versatility. The Narzo 50 Pro likely has a more modest camera system, potentially with a 64MP main sensor. Image quality in good lighting should be comparable, but the Xiaomi will likely excel in low-light conditions and offer more zoom capabilities.
Performance
Both devices utilize the Mediatek Dimensity 920 chipset, ensuring similar performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. However, software optimization can play a significant role. Xiaomi's MIUI might offer more features, while Realme UI could be lighter and faster. Real-world performance will likely be very close.
Battery Life
This is where the Xiaomi 11i truly shines. Its endurance rating of 106h is exceptional, indicating outstanding battery life. Coupled with its 120W HyperCharge, it can charge from 0% to 100% in just 15 minutes. The Narzo 50 Pro's 33W charging is significantly slower, taking around 31 minutes to reach 50%.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi 11i HyperCharge 5G is ideal for users who value rapid charging, long battery life, and a vibrant display. The Realme Narzo 50 Pro is a good choice for budget-conscious buyers who prioritize a smooth experience for everyday tasks and gaming, and don't mind slower charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Xiaomi 11i worth the extra money?
If you prioritize fast charging and long battery life, the Xiaomi 11i is definitely worth the investment. However, if you're on a tight budget and don't need those features, the Narzo 50 Pro offers a solid experience at a lower price.
❓ How does the Realme Narzo 50 Pro compare to other phones in its price range?
The Narzo 50 Pro is a competitive option, offering a good balance of performance and features for its price. However, other phones in the same range might offer better camera performance or a more refined software experience.