The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for money. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Wiko Y82 and the Xiaomi Poco C40. Both promise affordability, but which one delivers the better overall experience?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Poco C40 edges out the Wiko Y82 thanks to its more efficient chipset (11nm vs 28nm), potentially leading to better battery life and slightly improved performance. While both are budget options, the Poco C40's charging speed and modern processor give it a slight advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, Q3 | 2022, June 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, Q3 | Available. Released 2022, June 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 155.5 x 73.3 x 9.3 mm (6.12 x 2.89 x 0.37 in) | 169.6 x 76.6 x 9.2 mm (6.68 x 3.02 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| | - | Dust & splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) | 720 x 1650 pixels (~268 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.1 inches, 91.3 cm2 (~80.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.71 inches, 106.5 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 400 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) | JLQ JR510 (11 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | Mali-G57 MC1 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3600 mAh, removable | Li-Po 6000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Dark Blue, Light Blue | Power Black, Coral Green, Poco Yellow |
| Models | W-K630-EEA | 220333QPG |
| Price | About 90 EUR | About 110 EUR |
| SAR | 0.27 W/kg (head) 1.39 W/kg (body) | - |
Wiko Y82
- Large Display
- Simple User Interface
- Affordable Price
- Older Chipset
- Slower Charging
- Potentially Lower Performance
Xiaomi Poco C40
- More Efficient Chipset
- Faster Charging (18W)
- Potentially Better Battery Life
- Slightly Better Performance
- Design may be less appealing to some
- Basic Camera Capabilities
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large displays, likely around 6.5 inches, but the Poco C40 might offer slightly better color accuracy and brightness due to potentially more modern panel technology. Expect HD+ resolution on both, suitable for everyday use but not ideal for demanding visual tasks.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are likely similar, with both phones featuring a primary camera around 13-48MP and a depth sensor. Image quality will depend heavily on software processing. Expect decent daytime shots but struggles in low light. The Poco C40 might have a slight edge due to potentially better image processing algorithms.
Performance
The Poco C40's JLQ JR510 chipset, built on a more advanced 11nm process, should offer a noticeable performance advantage over the Wiko Y82's Unisoc SC9863A (28nm). Expect smoother multitasking and slightly faster app loading times on the Poco C40. Gaming performance will be basic on both.
Battery Life
The Poco C40 is expected to have better battery life due to its more efficient chipset. While both likely have a large battery capacity (around 5000mAh), the Poco C40's processor will consume less power. The 18W wired charging on the Poco C40 is also a significant advantage over the Wiko Y82, which likely has slower charging.
Buying Guide
The Wiko Y82 is a good choice for users prioritizing a large display and a simple, straightforward experience. The Xiaomi Poco C40 is better suited for those seeking a bit more performance and longer battery life, especially if they value faster charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Xiaomi Poco C40 is slightly better for gaming due to its more modern and efficient chipset, although neither phone is designed for demanding games.
❓ Does the Poco C40 support fast charging?
Yes, the Poco C40 supports 18W wired charging, which is faster than the likely charging speed of the Wiko Y82.
