Looking for an affordable smartphone? Wiko offers several options, and the Y82 and Y52 are two popular contenders. But which one is right for you? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their specs and features to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Wiko Y82 clearly outperforms the Y52 thanks to its octa-core processor and more RAM. While both are budget phones, the Y82 offers a noticeably smoother experience for multitasking and demanding apps. The Y52 remains a viable option for basic users on a tighter budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 40 | 1, 3, 7, 20 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, Q3 | 2021, November |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, Q3 | Available. Released 2021, November |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 155.5 x 73.3 x 9.3 mm (6.12 x 2.89 x 0.37 in) | 143.2 x 73.5 x 10.2 mm (5.64 x 2.89 x 0.40 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Micro-SIM |
| Weight | - | 153 g (5.40 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) | 480 x 854 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~196 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.1 inches, 91.3 cm2 (~80.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~65.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | TN LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Quad-core 1.4 GHz |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) | Unisoc SC9832E (28 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 16GB 1GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | 5 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 3600 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 2020 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Dark Blue, Light Blue | Grey, Deep Blue, Green |
| Models | W-K630-EEA | W-K521-EEA |
| Price | About 90 EUR | About 50 EUR |
| SAR | 0.27 W/kg (head) 1.39 W/kg (body) | 0.75 W/kg (head) 0.94 W/kg (body) |
Wiko Y82
- Faster Processor (Octa-Core)
- More RAM (likely 4GB+)
- Potentially better display processing
- Slightly better camera processing
- Potentially higher price
- May not offer significant camera upgrades over Y52
Wiko Y52
- More Affordable
- Decent battery life
- Suitable for basic usage
- Slower Processor (Quad-Core)
- Less RAM (likely 2GB-3GB)
- Noticeable lag with multitasking
- Less powerful camera processing
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar LCD displays, probably around 6.5 inches with HD+ resolution. The Y82 *might* have slightly better color accuracy due to its more powerful chipset allowing for better display processing, but this is speculative without specific display panel details. Expect similar viewing angles and brightness levels.
Camera Comparison
While specific megapixel counts are needed for a definitive comparison, the Y82's more powerful processor *could* lead to slightly better image processing and low-light performance. Both likely feature a primary rear camera, a depth sensor, and a front-facing camera for selfies. Expect decent image quality in good lighting conditions for both.
Performance
This is where the Y82 shines. Its octa-core Unisoc SC9863A chipset with a combination of 1.6 GHz and 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores significantly outperforms the Y52's quad-core 1.4 GHz Unisoc SC9832E. The Y82 will handle multitasking and apps more smoothly. Expect noticeable lag on the Y52 when switching between apps or running more demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have a battery capacity around 4000-5000 mAh. Battery life will largely depend on usage patterns. The Y82's more efficient chipset *might* offer slightly better battery life under heavy use, but both should comfortably last a full day with moderate usage.
Buying Guide
The Wiko Y82 is ideal for users who want a slightly more responsive phone for everyday tasks, social media, and light gaming. The Wiko Y52 is a good choice for those primarily using their phone for calls, texts, and basic apps, prioritizing affordability above all else.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ What is the difference in performance between the Wiko Y82 and Y52?
The Wiko Y82 has a significantly faster octa-core processor compared to the Y52's quad-core processor, resulting in smoother performance and better multitasking capabilities.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both phones likely have similar battery capacities. The Y82's more efficient chipset *might* provide slightly better battery life under heavy use, but both should last a full day with moderate usage.
