The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. Both the Wiko Y82 and Samsung Galaxy A02 aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price point. However, they take different approaches to achieving this, with the Wiko Y82 leveraging an octa-core processor while the Samsung Galaxy A02 opts for a quad-core solution. This comparison will dissect their key specifications to determine which device offers the best value for budget-conscious consumers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing multitasking and responsiveness, the Wiko Y82 emerges as the better choice. Its Unisoc SC9863A octa-core processor provides a significant performance advantage over the Samsung Galaxy A02’s Mediatek MT6739W, making it more suitable for everyday tasks and light app usage. While the A02 offers a wider range of storage/RAM configurations, the Y82’s core processing power is more impactful.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, Q3 | 2021, January 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, Q3 | Available. Released 2021, January 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 155.5 x 73.3 x 9.3 mm (6.12 x 2.89 x 0.37 in) | 164 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.1 inches, 91.3 cm2 (~80.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6739W (28 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | PowerVR GE8100 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, One UI Core 3.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/1.9, (wide), AF
2 MP (macro) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | - |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP, f/2.0 |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 3600 mAh, removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Dark Blue, Light Blue | Black, Blue |
| Models | W-K630-EEA | SM-A022F, SM-A022F/DS, SM-A022M, SM-A022M/DS, SM-A022G, SM-A022G/DS |
| Price | About 90 EUR | € 97.46 |
| SAR | 0.27 W/kg (head) 1.39 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.65 W/kg (head) 1.71 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 32GB 2GB RAM | - | $ 149.99 |
| 32GB 3GB RAM | - | $ 129.99 |
| 64GB 3GB RAM | - | $ 199.99 |
| RENEWED | - | £ 113.00 |
Wiko Y82
- Octa-core processor offers better multitasking
- Potentially smoother user experience
- More efficient processor architecture
- Limited information available on display and camera specs
- Brand recognition is lower than Samsung
Samsung Galaxy A02
- Large 5000mAh battery for extended usage
- Wider range of storage/RAM configurations
- Established brand reputation
- Quad-core processor feels sluggish with multiple apps
- Slow 10W charging
- Low-resolution display
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both utilize 28nm chipsets, suggesting a focus on cost reduction over display technology. Specific display specs (resolution, panel type, brightness) are missing for the Wiko Y82, but given its price point, it likely features a basic IPS LCD panel. The Samsung Galaxy A02 features a 6.5-inch PLS LCD, a Samsung-specific variant of IPS, offering decent viewing angles. However, the A02’s lower resolution (720 x 1600) results in a pixel density of around 270 ppi, which is noticeably less sharp than many competitors. The absence of details on the Y82’s display makes a direct comparison difficult, but it’s unlikely to surpass the A02 in terms of clarity.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature basic camera setups. The Samsung Galaxy A02 offers a 13MP main sensor, which is a reasonable starting point for budget photography. However, the inclusion of a 2MP macro lens and a 2MP depth sensor adds little practical value. These low-resolution sensors primarily serve to inflate the camera’s megapixel count without significantly improving image quality. The Wiko Y82’s camera specifications are not provided, but it’s reasonable to assume a similar configuration with a primary sensor around the 8-13MP range. Image processing will likely be a key differentiator, with Samsung’s software potentially offering slightly more refined results, but neither phone is expected to excel in low-light conditions or dynamic range.
Performance
The core difference lies in the processors. The Wiko Y82’s Unisoc SC9863A is an octa-core chip with a heterogeneous core configuration – four Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and four at 1.2 GHz. This allows for efficient task management, dedicating power to demanding tasks while conserving energy during lighter workloads. In contrast, the Samsung Galaxy A02’s Mediatek MT6739W is a quad-core processor utilizing Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.5 GHz. While the A53 cores are individually more powerful than the A55 cores at the same clock speed, the sheer number of cores on the Y82 provides a significant advantage in multitasking and overall responsiveness. The A02’s performance will likely feel sluggish with more than a few apps open. The Y82’s architecture is better suited for running modern Android applications, even if both are likely to benefit from Android Go.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for the Wiko Y82. The Samsung Galaxy A02 packs a 5000mAh battery, which is substantial for a phone in this price range. However, the power-efficient Mediatek MT6739W processor doesn’t require as much energy as a more powerful chip. Charging speed is a significant drawback for the A02, with only 10W charging support. This translates to a lengthy charging time from 0-100%. Without knowing the Y82’s battery capacity and charging speed, it’s difficult to make a definitive comparison, but the A02’s large battery provides a clear advantage in longevity, assuming moderate usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko Y82 if you need a phone capable of handling multiple apps simultaneously and appreciate a smoother user experience, even with basic tasks. It’s ideal for users who occasionally browse social media, stream videos, or use messaging apps. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A02 if you prioritize brand recognition and a wider selection of storage/RAM options, and your usage is limited to very basic tasks like calls, texts, and occasional light browsing. The A02 is best suited for first-time smartphone users or those with minimal mobile data needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Mediatek MT6739W chip in the Samsung Galaxy A02 prone to overheating during prolonged use?
The Mediatek MT6739W is a relatively low-power chip, and overheating is unlikely during typical usage scenarios like browsing, calling, or messaging. However, demanding tasks like gaming or video recording may cause the phone to warm up, and performance could be throttled to prevent overheating.
❓ Does the Wiko Y82 support running multiple apps simultaneously without significant slowdown?
The Wiko Y82’s octa-core Unisoc SC9863A processor is designed to handle multitasking more effectively than the quad-core Mediatek MT6739W in the A02. While it won’t rival flagship performance, it should be able to run several apps concurrently without experiencing severe lag or slowdown.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge the Samsung Galaxy A02 with the included 10W charger?
Due to the 10W charging speed and the 5000mAh battery capacity, fully charging the Samsung Galaxy A02 can take upwards of 3-4 hours. This is a significant drawback compared to phones with faster charging capabilities.
