The Wiko Y82 and itel Vision 2S represent the extreme end of the smartphone price spectrum. Both devices target first-time smartphone buyers or those needing a reliable secondary device. This comparison dissects their similarities and differences, focusing on where the slight price variations translate into tangible user benefits.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging, the itel Vision 2S is the better choice. While both phones share the same Unisoc SC9863A chipset, the 18W charging support offers a significant convenience advantage over the Wiko Y82's standard charging, making it more practical for daily use.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 40 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, Q3 | 2021 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, Q3 | Available. Released 2021 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 155.5 x 73.3 x 9.3 mm (6.12 x 2.89 x 0.37 in) | 166 x 76.3 x 8.9 mm (6.54 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM |
| Weight | - | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.1 inches, 91.3 cm2 (~80.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 8 MP
0.3 MP |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | - |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | - | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3600 mAh, removable | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Dark Blue, Light Blue | Gradation Purple, Gradation Blue, Deep Blue |
| Models | W-K630-EEA | - |
| Price | About 90 EUR | - |
| SAR | 0.27 W/kg (head) 1.39 W/kg (body) | - |
Wiko Y82
- Potentially lower price point (depending on retailer)
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Likely a clean Android experience
- Slower charging speeds
- Limited performance for demanding apps
- Average camera quality
itel Vision 2S
- 18W fast charging for quicker top-ups
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Potentially better value for money
- May be slightly more expensive than the Wiko Y82
- Limited performance for demanding apps
- Average camera quality
Display Comparison
Both the Wiko Y82 and itel Vision 2S likely feature similar LCD panels, given their price point. Without specific display specs, we can assume both offer standard 60Hz refresh rates and resolutions around 720p+. Expect noticeable bezels on both devices. Color accuracy and brightness will likely be average, suitable for indoor use but potentially washed out in direct sunlight. The absence of features like higher PWM dimming rates or wide color gamut support is expected in this segment.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance on both devices will be limited by the chipset's image signal processor (ISP) and sensor quality. While both may include multiple rear cameras, the primary sensor's resolution and aperture are the most critical factors. Without specific details, it's safe to assume image quality will be acceptable in well-lit conditions but suffer in low light. The inclusion of 2MP macro or depth sensors is likely, but these offer minimal practical benefit due to their low resolution and limited functionality. Expect basic image processing with limited dynamic range and detail.
Performance
The core of both devices is the Unisoc SC9863A (28nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 and 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This chipset is designed for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media browsing. Performance will be adequate for these tasks, but expect noticeable lag when multitasking or running demanding applications. The 28nm manufacturing process isn't particularly efficient, meaning thermal throttling could become a factor during prolonged use, impacting sustained performance. RAM configurations are unknown, but likely limited, further constraining multitasking capabilities.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is unspecified for the Wiko Y82, but it's likely in the 4000-5000 mAh range, typical for this price segment. The itel Vision 2S stands out with its 18W wired charging support. This is a significant advantage over the Wiko Y82, which likely supports only standard 5W or 10W charging. The faster charging speed on the itel Vision 2S translates to significantly reduced charging times, making it more convenient for users who need to quickly top up their battery. While a larger battery capacity on the Wiko Y82 *could* offset the slower charging, the convenience of 18W charging is a more impactful benefit for most users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko Y82 if you need a basic, functional smartphone and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It's a solid option for minimalists or those who rarely use their phone throughout the day. Buy the itel Vision 2S if you prefer quicker top-ups and value the convenience of 18W charging, especially if you're a moderate to heavy user who needs to recharge frequently.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc SC9863A chipset struggle with popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook?
While the Unisoc SC9863A can run apps like WhatsApp and Facebook, expect some lag when switching between them or when the apps are heavily loaded with media. It's designed for basic tasks, and multitasking can strain its resources. Keeping background apps to a minimum will improve performance.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the itel Vision 2S with the 18W charger?
Assuming a 4000-5000 mAh battery, the itel Vision 2S should fully charge in approximately 2.5 to 3.5 hours with the 18W charger. This is significantly faster than the Wiko Y82, which could take 5-6 hours with a standard charger.
❓ Can either of these phones play PUBG Mobile?
PUBG Mobile is likely playable on the lowest graphics settings, but expect a choppy and unstable experience. The Unisoc SC9863A lacks the processing power and GPU performance to handle demanding games like PUBG smoothly. Frame rates will be low, and thermal throttling will likely occur quickly.
❓ What version of Android do these phones run?
Given their price point, both devices likely run an older version of Android, potentially Android 11 or 12 Go Edition. This is a lightweight version of Android designed to run efficiently on devices with limited RAM and processing power.
