Looking for an affordable smartphone? The Wiko Y81 and Y82 are both contenders in the budget market. But which one offers the best value? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their specs, performance, and features to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Wiko Y82 edges out the Y81 thanks to its octa-core processor and slightly more modern architecture, resulting in better overall performance. While both are budget phones, the Y82 provides a smoother experience for everyday tasks and light gaming.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, August 18. Released 2020, August 18 | 2021, Q3 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, Q3 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 157.9 x 76.1 x 8.3 mm (6.22 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 155.5 x 73.3 x 9.3 mm (6.12 x 2.89 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 166 g (5.86 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~271 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.2 inches, 95.9 cm2 (~79.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 91.3 cm2 (~80.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761D Helio A20 (12 nm) | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8300 | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 10 (Go edition) | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | 13 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 4000 mAh | Li-Ion 3600 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Deep Blue, Gold, Green | Black, Dark Blue, Light Blue |
| Models | - | W-K630-EEA |
| Price | About 80 EUR | About 90 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.27 W/kg (head) 1.39 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.56 W/kg (head) 1.61 W/kg (body) | - |
Wiko Y81
- Potentially lower price
- Compact design (relatively)
- Decent battery life
- Less powerful processor
- Older chipset architecture
- May struggle with demanding apps
Wiko Y82
- Octa-core processor for better performance
- More modern CPU architecture
- Larger display (likely)
- Improved multitasking
- Slightly larger size
- Potentially higher price
- 28nm process (less efficient than 12nm)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large displays, likely around 6.5 inches, with HD+ resolution. The Y82 might offer slightly better color accuracy and brightness due to potentially newer panel technology, but both will be adequate for media consumption. Expect similar viewing angles and overall display quality.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are likely similar, with both phones featuring a primary rear camera around 13MP and a depth sensor. Image quality will depend heavily on software processing. The Y82's more powerful processor *could* allow for slightly better image processing and potentially better low-light performance, but don't expect a huge difference. Both will likely offer decent selfies with a front-facing camera around 8MP.
Performance
This is where the Y82 has a clear advantage. The Unisoc SC9863A octa-core processor, while on a slightly older 28nm process, offers more cores and a more modern Cortex-A55 architecture compared to the Y81's Mediatek Helio A20 quad-core. Expect smoother app loading, better multitasking, and improved responsiveness on the Y82. The Y81 will handle basic tasks adequately, but may struggle with demanding apps.
Battery Life
Both phones likely feature a battery capacity around 4000mAh. Battery life will be comparable, offering a full day of moderate use. The Y82's more efficient processor *might* provide slightly better battery life under heavy load, but the difference will be minimal.
Buying Guide
The Wiko Y81 is a good choice for users prioritizing a slightly more compact design and a potentially lower price point (depending on current deals). The Wiko Y82 is better suited for those who need a bit more processing power for multitasking and occasional gaming, and appreciate a larger display.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ What is the difference between the Mediatek Helio A20 and the Unisoc SC9863A?
The Unisoc SC9863A is an octa-core processor with a more modern Cortex-A55 architecture, offering better performance than the Wiko Y81's quad-core Helio A20, which uses older Cortex-A53 cores.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Wiko Y82 is the better choice for gaming due to its octa-core processor and improved performance. However, neither phone is designed for high-end gaming.
