The ultra-budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive. Both the Wiko Y62 and Samsung Galaxy A02 aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at the lowest possible price. However, significant differences in their underlying hardware, particularly the chipsets, dictate their real-world performance and suitability for different users. This comparison dissects those differences to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing basic functionality like calls, messaging, and light social media, the Wiko Y62 offers a slight edge due to its newer and more efficient Mediatek Helio A20 chipset. While the Samsung Galaxy A02 provides more RAM options and brand recognition, the older MT6739W struggles to keep pace.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 20 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April | 2021, January 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April | Available. Released 2021, January 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 157 x 75.8 x 9.1 mm (6.18 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) | 164 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171.5 g (6.03 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.1 inches, 91.3 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 | Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761D Helio A20 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6739W (28 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8100 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, One UI Core 3.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 1GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/1.9, (wide), AF
2 MP (macro) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP, f/2.0 |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dark Blue, Light Blue, Mint | Black, Blue |
| Models | W-K610-EEA, W-K610-TVM | SM-A022F, SM-A022F/DS, SM-A022M, SM-A022M/DS, SM-A022G, SM-A022G/DS |
| Price | About 70 EUR | € 97.46 |
| SAR | 0.42 W/kg (head) 1.61 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.65 W/kg (head) 1.71 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 32GB 2GB RAM | - | $ 149.99 |
| 32GB 3GB RAM | - | $ 129.99 |
| 64GB 3GB RAM | - | $ 199.99 |
| RENEWED | - | £ 113.00 |
Wiko Y62
- More efficient Mediatek Helio A20 chipset
- Potentially better thermal management
- Slightly higher CPU clock speed
- RAM configuration is unknown
- Limited brand recognition compared to Samsung
Samsung Galaxy A02
- Multiple RAM options (2GB/3GB)
- Wider availability and brand recognition
- Storage options up to 64GB
- Older and less efficient Mediatek MT6739W chipset
- Larger fabrication process (28nm) leads to more heat
- Slower CPU clock speed
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both are likely to feature LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. Specifics like resolution and brightness are not provided, but we can infer that they are both targeting the bare minimum for readability. The lack of information prevents a detailed comparison of color accuracy or viewing angles. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, maximizing screen real estate within a compact form factor.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar on both devices, leaning towards basic functionality. Neither phone is expected to excel in image quality. The Galaxy A02’s available configurations include 32GB/2GB, 32GB/3GB, and 64GB/3GB options, suggesting a focus on storage flexibility. While both likely feature a primary camera, details regarding sensor size and aperture are missing. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the A02 is unlikely to deliver significant improvements in image quality, serving more as a marketing feature than a practical benefit. Image processing will be basic on both, prioritizing speed over detail.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Wiko Y62’s Mediatek Helio A20 (12nm) is built on a smaller fabrication process than the Samsung Galaxy A02’s Mediatek MT6739W (28nm). This 12nm process generally translates to improved power efficiency and potentially better thermal management, meaning the Y62 is less likely to throttle under sustained load. While both CPUs utilize a quad-core Cortex-A53 architecture, the Helio A20’s slightly higher clock speed (1.8 GHz vs 1.5 GHz) provides a modest performance boost. The Galaxy A02 offers 2GB or 3GB of RAM, while the Y62’s RAM configuration is unspecified, but the availability of more RAM on the A02 models could mitigate some of the chipset’s performance deficit for multitasking. However, the older chipset will still be a bottleneck.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, given the low-power chipsets, both should offer all-day battery life with moderate usage. Charging wattage is also unknown, but we can expect slow charging speeds, likely via Micro-USB. The Helio A20’s improved power efficiency in the Wiko Y62 could translate to slightly longer battery life, even with a similar capacity battery, but this is speculative without concrete data.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko Y62 if you need a phone for essential tasks and value a more modern, albeit still entry-level, processor for smoother operation. It’s ideal for first-time smartphone users or those needing a reliable backup device. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A02 if you prioritize brand familiarity, potentially need more RAM for multitasking (depending on the model chosen), and are willing to accept slightly slower performance in exchange for a wider range of price points and availability.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Samsung Galaxy A02 struggle with popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook?
The MT6739W chipset in the Galaxy A02 is capable of running these apps, but you may experience noticeable lag and slowdowns, especially with multiple apps open simultaneously. The 2GB RAM configuration will exacerbate this issue. The Wiko Y62, with its Helio A20, should offer a smoother experience, though still not ideal for demanding multitasking.
❓ Is the 64GB storage option on the Samsung Galaxy A02 worth the extra cost?
If you plan to store a significant number of photos, videos, or apps, the 64GB storage option is highly recommended. The base 32GB model can fill up quickly, especially considering the limited RAM. However, both phones support microSD card expansion, offering a cost-effective way to increase storage capacity.
❓ Can either of these phones handle basic mobile gaming?
Both phones can handle very basic 2D games. However, demanding 3D games will likely be unplayable or suffer from extremely low frame rates. The Helio A20 in the Wiko Y62 offers a slight advantage, but neither phone is designed for gaming.
