The Wiko Y62 and Nokia C200 represent the ultra-budget end of the smartphone spectrum, targeting first-time smartphone users or those needing a reliable secondary device. Both rely on Mediatek’s Helio series of chipsets, but subtle differences in processing power and features could make one a better fit for your needs. This comparison dives deep into the specifications to reveal which phone delivers the most value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Nokia C200 offers a slight edge due to its faster 2.0 GHz CPU, providing a more responsive experience for everyday tasks. While the Wiko Y62 is a viable option, the Nokia’s marginally improved performance and 10W charging support make it the better choice for those prioritizing usability.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 20 | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 41, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE (2CA) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April | 2022, January 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April | Available. Released 2022, Q2 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 157 x 75.8 x 9.1 mm (6.18 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) | 156.5 x 73.1 x 8.8 mm (6.16 x 2.88 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171.5 g (6.03 oz) | 172.5 g (6.10 oz) |
| | - | Splash protection |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.1 inches, 91.3 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.09 inches, 91.0 cm2 (~79.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761D Helio A20 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 1GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP | 13 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dark Blue, Light Blue, Mint | Meteor Black |
| Models | W-K610-EEA, W-K610-TVM | TA-1437, TA-1510 |
| Price | About 70 EUR | About 60 EUR |
| SAR | 0.42 W/kg (head) 1.61 W/kg (body) | 1.11 W/kg (head) 1.33 W/kg (body) |
Wiko Y62
- Potentially lower price point
- Basic functionality for essential tasks
- Compact and lightweight design (likely)
- Slower processor than Nokia C200
- No specified charging standard
- Limited performance for multitasking
Nokia C200
- Faster 2.0 GHz CPU for improved responsiveness
- 10W wired charging support
- Slightly better multitasking capabilities
- May be slightly more expensive than Wiko Y62
- Still limited for demanding applications
- Basic camera system
Display Comparison
Neither Wiko nor Nokia provide display specifications beyond the basic panel size. Given the price point, both likely utilize LCD panels with 720p+ resolution. The absence of details like peak brightness or color gamut suggests neither phone is geared towards media consumption. Expect basic viewing experiences suitable for functional tasks, but not ideal for outdoor visibility or vibrant color reproduction.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are sparse for both devices. It’s safe to assume both feature basic camera setups, likely with a single main sensor and potentially a secondary depth or macro lens. Without knowing sensor sizes or apertures, it’s difficult to assess image quality. However, given the target market, image processing will likely prioritize speed over detail. Users shouldn’t expect flagship-level photography from either device; these cameras are best suited for casual snapshots in good lighting conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Wiko Y62 uses the Mediatek MT6761D Helio A20 with a quad-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 CPU, while the Nokia C200 features the MT6761 Helio A22 with a quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 CPU. The 200 MHz clock speed increase in the A22 translates to a noticeable, albeit modest, performance boost in app loading times and general responsiveness. Both chipsets are built on a 12nm process, meaning thermal efficiency will be similar, but the A22’s higher clock speed will likely result in slightly more power draw. Neither chipset is designed for demanding gaming; expect limited performance in graphically intensive titles.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn’t specified for the Wiko Y62, but typical budget phones in this class range from 3000mAh to 4000mAh. The Nokia C200 supports 10W wired charging, a feature absent from the Wiko Y62’s specifications. While 10W is slow by modern standards, it provides a reliable method for replenishing the battery. The lack of charging information for the Wiko Y62 suggests a slower, potentially USB 2.0-based charging solution, or reliance on user-supplied chargers.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko Y62 if you need a basic smartphone for essential communication – calls, texts, and light app usage – and are prioritizing the absolute lowest possible price. Buy the Nokia C200 if you prefer a slightly smoother user experience, particularly when multitasking or opening apps, and value the convenience of wired charging, even at a slower 10W rate.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Nokia C200 be able to run popular social media apps like Facebook and WhatsApp smoothly?
Yes, the Nokia C200’s Mediatek Helio A22 chipset, with its 2.0 GHz quad-core CPU, is sufficient to run basic social media applications like Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram without significant lag. However, expect slower loading times compared to phones with more powerful processors.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Nokia C200 with the 10W charger?
With the included 10W charger, the Nokia C200 will likely take between 3 to 4 hours to fully charge from 0% to 100%, depending on battery capacity. While slower than fast charging solutions, it provides a reliable overnight charging option.
❓ Can the Wiko Y62 handle basic mobile games like Candy Crush or Subway Surfers?
The Wiko Y62 can handle simple, less demanding mobile games like Candy Crush or Subway Surfers, but expect limited performance and potential frame rate drops. More graphically intensive games are unlikely to run smoothly on the Helio A20 chipset.
❓ Is the Nokia C200 a good choice for someone upgrading from a feature phone?
Yes, the Nokia C200 is an excellent choice for someone upgrading from a feature phone. Its simple interface, essential features, and affordable price point make it an accessible entry point into the world of smartphones.
