Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? Wiko offers a couple of compelling options: the Y52 and the Power U20. Both target budget-conscious consumers, but they have key differences. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Wiko Power U20 emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly more powerful processor, better battery life, and faster charging. While the Y52 might be slightly more affordable, the U20's performance and longevity make it the better overall value.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | CDMA 800 / 1700 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 20 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November | 2021, June |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November | Available. Released 2021, June |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 143.2 x 73.5 x 10.2 mm (5.64 x 2.89 x 0.40 in) | 173.8 x 78.6 x 9.5 mm (6.84 x 3.09 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Micro-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 153 g (5.40 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 480 x 854 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~196 ppi density) | 720 x 1640 pixels (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~65.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 104.8 cm2 (~76.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TN LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.4 GHz | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9832E (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-T820 MP1 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 16GB 1GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Triple | - | 13 MP, AF
2 MP
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 4.2, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 2020 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 6000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Grey, Deep Blue, Green | Slate Grey, Navy Blue, Mint |
| Models | W-K521-EEA | W-V750BN-EEA |
| Price | About 50 EUR | About 120 EUR |
| SAR | 0.75 W/kg (head) 0.94 W/kg (body) | 0.58 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) |
Wiko Y52
- Potentially lower price
- Compact size (likely)
- Decent basic functionality
- Weak processor
- Limited performance
- Shorter battery life
- No fast charging
Wiko Power U20
- Powerful processor (Helio G35)
- Long battery life
- Fast charging (15W)
- Smoother performance
- Potentially slightly higher price
- Design may be less appealing to some
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar display technology (likely IPS LCD) and resolution (likely HD+). The Power U20 might have a slightly larger display, but overall, display quality will be comparable. Expect decent viewing angles and color reproduction for the price range.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are likely similar, with both phones featuring a multi-lens setup (likely a primary sensor, depth sensor, and potentially a macro lens). However, the Power U20's more powerful processor could lead to slightly better image processing and overall photo quality, especially in low light. Expect decent, but not exceptional, camera performance from both.
Performance
This is where the Power U20 shines. The Mediatek Helio G35 chipset, built on a 12nm process, is considerably more powerful than the Unisoc SC9832E (28nm) in the Y52. The octa-core CPU in the U20 will provide noticeably smoother multitasking, app loading, and gaming performance. The Y52 will feel sluggish by comparison.
Battery Life
The Power U20's name gives it away – it's focused on battery life. While the Y52 likely has a decent battery capacity, the U20's larger capacity (likely 5000mAh or higher) combined with the more efficient 12nm chipset will result in significantly longer battery life. The 15W wired charging on the U20 is also a welcome addition.
Buying Guide
The Wiko Y52 is a good choice for users prioritizing a very low price point and basic functionality. The Wiko Power U20 is ideal for those who need a phone that can handle everyday tasks smoothly, offers longer battery life, and appreciates faster charging capabilities.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ What is the difference between the Unisoc SC9832E and the Mediatek Helio G35?
The Mediatek Helio G35 is significantly more powerful and efficient than the Unisoc SC9832E. It offers better performance for multitasking, gaming, and overall responsiveness.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Wiko Power U20 is the clear choice for gaming due to its more powerful processor and better graphics capabilities.
