Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The Wiko Y52 and Alcatel 1B (2020) are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one offers the best bang for your buck? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Wiko Y52 edges out the Alcatel 1B (2020) thanks to its slightly faster processor and potentially better display. However, both are entry-level devices with limitations. Consider your priorities – if raw speed is key, the Y52 wins; if ultra-budget is paramount, the 1B is a solid choice.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 20 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November | 2020, January. Released 2020, May |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 143.2 x 73.5 x 10.2 mm (5.64 x 2.89 x 0.40 in) | 146.1 x 71.6 x 9.9 mm (5.75 x 2.82 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Micro-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 153 g (5.40 oz) | 168 g (5.93 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 480 x 854 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~196 ppi density) | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~293 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~65.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.5 inches, 78.1 cm2 (~74.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TN LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.4 GHz | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9832E (28 nm) | Qualcomm QM215 Snapdragon 215 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-T820 MP1 | Adreno 308 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 10 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 1GB RAM | 16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 2020 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 3000 mAh battery |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Grey, Deep Blue, Green | Prime Black, Pine Green |
| Models | W-K521-EEA | 5002A, 5002D, 5002F, 5002I, 5002M, 5002X, 5002S, 5002R, 5002D_EEA, 5002H_EEA, 5002H, 5002B, 5002C, 5002W, 5002H_TR |
| Price | About 50 EUR | About 80 EUR |
| SAR | 0.75 W/kg (head) 0.94 W/kg (body) | - |
Wiko Y52
- Slightly faster processor
- Potentially better display
- Modern design
- Decent battery life
- Unisoc chipset not as well-optimized as Qualcomm
- Limited storage options
- Camera performance is basic
alcatel 1B (2020)
- Very affordable
- Clean Android experience
- Decent battery life
- Reliable brand
- Slower processor
- Basic camera
- Limited features
- Less premium build quality
Display Comparison
Both phones feature relatively small, HD+ displays. The Wiko Y52 likely has slightly better color accuracy and brightness, though specific panel details are scarce. Expect adequate viewing for everyday use, but not a premium experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are similar, typically featuring a 13MP main camera and a depth sensor. Image quality will be adequate in good lighting conditions, but expect noise and limited detail in low light. The Wiko Y52 *might* have slightly better image processing.
Performance
The Wiko Y52's Unisoc SC9832E chipset and 1.4 GHz CPU offer a marginal performance advantage over the Alcatel 1B's Qualcomm QM215 Snapdragon 215 and 1.3 GHz CPU. This translates to slightly smoother app loading and multitasking, though neither phone is a powerhouse.
Battery Life
Both phones typically feature around 4000mAh batteries, offering all-day battery life with moderate usage. Actual battery performance will depend on usage patterns and software optimization.
Buying Guide
The Wiko Y52 is ideal for users who need a little extra performance for basic multitasking and occasional gaming. The Alcatel 1B (2020) is perfect for those on a very tight budget who primarily need a phone for calls, texts, and essential apps.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better performance?
The Wiko Y52 generally offers slightly better performance due to its marginally faster processor.
❓ Are these phones good for gaming?
Neither phone is ideal for demanding games. They can handle basic games, but don't expect smooth performance on high settings.
❓ What is the software experience like on each phone?
The Alcatel 1B (2020) typically runs a cleaner, more stock version of Android. The Wiko Y52 may have a slightly more customized UI.
❓ Which phone offers better value for money?
The Alcatel 1B (2020) generally offers better value for money due to its significantly lower price point.
