Wiko View5 vs Samsung Galaxy S7: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy S7 is the clear winner despite its age. Its superior chipset, display, and camera significantly outperform the Wiko View5. While the View5 offers affordability, the S7's overall performance and features justify its potential higher price on the used market.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Wiko View5 | Samsung Galaxy S7 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 - G930FD |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - G930F, G930FD, G930W8 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - G930F, G930FD |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat9 450/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41 - G930W8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, September. Released 2020, September | 2016, February 21. Released 2016, March 11 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 4), glass back (Gorilla Glass 4), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 166 x 76.8 x 9.3 mm (6.54 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) | 142.4 x 69.6 x 7.9 mm (5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM (G930F)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM (G930FD) |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 152 g (5.36 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 4 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~268 ppi density) | 1440 x 2560 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~577 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~81.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.1 inches, 71.5 cm2 (~72.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Mongoose & 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762D Helio A25 (12 nm) | Exynos 8890 Octa (14 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-T880 MP12 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow), upgradable to Android 8.0 (Oreo), TouchWiz UI |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, (wide), AF 8 MP, (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 8 MP | 12 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 1080p@60fps, 720p@240fps, HDR, stereo sound rec., OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP, f/1.7, 22mm (wide), 1/4.1", 1.34µm |
| Video | - | 1440p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 4.2, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| - | ANT+ S-Voice natural language commands and dictation Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 15W wired, QC2 Wireless (Qi) (market dependent) |
| Music play | - | Up to 62 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 22 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Blue, Pine Green, Peach Gold | Black, White, Gold, Silver, Pink Gold |
| Models | W-V851-EEA | SM-G930F, SM-G930A, SM-G930P, SM-G930V, SM-G930T, SM-G930R, SM-G930F, SM-G930FD, SM-G930W8, SM-G930S, SM-G930L, SM-G930K, SM-G9300 |
| Price | About 370 EUR | About 190 EUR |
| SAR | 0.91 W/kg (head) 1.54 W/kg (body) | 1.40 W/kg (head) 1.59 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.41 W/kg (head) 0.62 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -92.5dB / Crosstalk -92.7dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 80h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 4.376 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - | Voice 69dB / Noise 69dB / Ring 71dB |
| Performance | - | Basemark OS II 2.0: 2128Basemark X: 32345 |
Wiko View5
- Affordable
- Decent battery life
- Sufficient for basic tasks
- Weak performance
- Mediocre camera
- Lower quality display
- Outdated software
Samsung Galaxy S7
- Powerful processor
- Excellent camera
- Vibrant AMOLED display
- Wireless charging (market dependent)
- Premium build quality
- Older device
- Potential battery degradation
- Software updates discontinued
- May be more expensive (used)
Display Comparison
The Galaxy S7 boasts a significantly better display. While both have a good contrast ratio, the S7's AMOLED panel offers vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and better viewing angles compared to the View5's likely IPS LCD. The S7's display also generally has better brightness and outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy S7's camera remains impressive even today. It captures detailed photos with accurate colors and excellent dynamic range. The View5's camera is adequate for casual snapshots, but lacks the S7's low-light performance, image stabilization, and overall image quality.
Performance
The Exynos 8890 in the Galaxy S7 is a powerhouse compared to the Mediatek Helio A25 in the View5. The S7's CPU and GPU offer noticeably faster processing speeds, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. The View5 will handle basic tasks adequately, but struggles with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones are reported to have an endurance rating of 80h. However, the S7's more efficient chipset and optimized software likely contribute to better real-world battery life despite the View5 potentially having a slightly larger battery capacity.
Buying Guide
The Wiko View5 is ideal for users on a tight budget who prioritize basic functionality and affordability. The Samsung Galaxy S7 is a better choice for those seeking a premium experience, excellent camera quality, and reliable performance, even if it means buying a refurbished device.