The Wiko View5 and Oppo A53s 5G represent two approaches to affordable 5G connectivity. The Wiko View5 aims for extreme affordability, while the Oppo A53s 5G attempts to balance cost with a more modern chipset. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right phone for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo A53s 5G is the better choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset provides a substantial performance uplift over the Wiko View5’s Helio A25, enabling smoother multitasking and a more responsive user experience. While the Wiko View5 is cheaper, the performance gap is too significant to ignore.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September. Released 2020, September | 2021, April 27 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, May 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 166 x 76.8 x 9.3 mm (6.54 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) | 164 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 189.6 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~268 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~81.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762D Helio A25 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, (wide), AF
8 MP, (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Triple | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Blue, Pine Green, Peach Gold | Crystal Blue, Ink Black |
| Models | W-V851-EEA | CPH2321 |
| Price | About 370 EUR | About 170 EUR |
| SAR | 0.91 W/kg (head) 1.54 W/kg (body) | - |
Wiko View5
- Lowest possible price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Potentially longer battery life due to less powerful processor
- Significantly slower performance
- Outdated chipset
- Poor gaming performance
Oppo A53s 5G
- Much faster processor (Dimensity 700)
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- More responsive user experience
- Slow 10W charging
- May be slightly more expensive
- Potentially shorter battery life than Wiko View5
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data focuses on processing, we can infer both likely utilize LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The Wiko View5, with its Helio A25, likely has a lower-quality panel with narrower viewing angles. The Oppo A53s 5G, benefiting from a more modern chipset, *may* have a slightly better panel, but neither is expected to compete with higher-end OLED displays. Bezels are likely substantial on both, and color accuracy will be standard for budget devices.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it’s safe to assume both phones feature basic camera setups. The Oppo A53s 5G likely has a more capable main sensor, benefiting from the improved image signal processor (ISP) within the Dimensity 700 chipset. The Wiko View5’s Helio A25 has a less sophisticated ISP, resulting in lower-quality images, especially in low-light conditions. Any 2MP macro or depth sensors on either device should be considered marketing filler rather than genuine photographic tools.
Performance
The performance difference is the defining factor here. The Oppo A53s 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 700, built on a 7nm process, is a significant leap over the Wiko View5’s 12nm Mediatek Helio A25. The Dimensity 700’s Cortex-A76 cores provide substantially more processing power than the A25’s Cortex-A53 cores, resulting in faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. The A25’s CPU is split into 4x1.8 GHz and 4x1.5 GHz cores, indicating a focus on power saving rather than raw speed. The Dimensity 700’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores paired with 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores offer a much more balanced and powerful experience. This translates to a noticeable difference in gaming performance and overall responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Oppo A53s 5G’s 10W charging is slow by modern standards, but the Dimensity 700’s 7nm efficiency may offset this. The Helio A25, while less powerful, is also less efficient. Without knowing the battery capacities, it’s difficult to definitively say which phone offers better battery life. However, the Oppo A53s 5G’s more efficient chipset could translate to comparable or even better real-world battery performance despite potentially having a smaller battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko View5 if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media, and your budget is extremely limited. You’re prioritizing absolute cost savings over performance. Buy the Oppo A53s 5G if you want a phone capable of handling more demanding apps, occasional gaming, and benefit from the faster speeds of 5G networks without breaking the bank. You value a smoother, more future-proof experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oppo A53s 5G handle popular games like PUBG Mobile?
The Oppo A53s 5G’s Dimensity 700 chipset is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but likely at medium settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The Wiko View5’s Helio A25 will struggle significantly with PUBG Mobile, offering a poor gaming experience.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Oppo A53s 5G actually useful?
The usefulness of 5G depends on your location and carrier coverage. If you live in an area with strong 5G signals, you’ll experience significantly faster download and upload speeds compared to 4G. However, if 5G coverage is limited, the benefit will be minimal.
❓ How much faster is the Oppo A53s 5G in everyday tasks compared to the Wiko View5?
Expect a noticeable difference in app loading times, web browsing, and multitasking. The Oppo A53s 5G’s Dimensity 700 will feel much more responsive and fluid than the Wiko View5’s Helio A25, especially when switching between apps.
