Wiko View5 vs. Nokia 5.4: A Detailed Comparison of Budget Chipsets

The Wiko View5 and Nokia 5.4 represent two approaches to the ultra-budget smartphone market. The Wiko prioritizes a lower entry price, while the Nokia 5.4 aims for a more balanced experience with a more modern chipset. This comparison dives deep into the core differences, focusing on the performance implications of their respective processors.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and a smoother overall experience, the Nokia 5.4 is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 662, built on an 11nm process, delivers noticeably improved performance over the Wiko View5’s MediaTek Helio A25, despite the Nokia’s slower 10W charging.

PHONES
Phone Names Wiko View5 Nokia 5.4
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - International
4G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 401, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International
SpeedHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 MbpsHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
 -1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 28, 66 - NA, LATAM
Launch
Announced2020, September. Released 2020, September2020, December 15. Released 2020, December 25
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
Dimensions166 x 76.8 x 9.3 mm (6.54 x 3.02 x 0.37 in)161 x 76 x 8.7 mm (6.34 x 2.99 x 0.34 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight201 g (7.09 oz)181 g (6.38 oz)
Display
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~268 ppi density)720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~269 ppi density)
Size6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~81.2% screen-to-body ratio)6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~81.9% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 450 nits (peak)IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver)
ChipsetMediatek MT6762D Helio A25 (12 nm)Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm)
GPUPowerVR GE8320Adreno 610
OSAndroid 10Android 10, upgradable to Android 12
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal64GB 3GB RAM64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM
 eMMC 5.1-
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDRLED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad48 MP, (wide), AF 8 MP, (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, 13mm (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Single8 MP-
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single8 MP16 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
Video-1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth4.2, A2DP4.2, A2DP, aptX Adaptive
NFCNoYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioFM radioFM radio
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/acWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
Features
SensorsFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity
Battery
Charging-10W wired
TypeLi-Po 5000 mAhLi-Po 4000 mAh
Misc
ColorsMidnight Blue, Pine Green, Peach GoldPolar Night, Dusk
ModelsW-V851-EEATA-1333, TA-1340, TA-1337, TA-1328, TA-1325
PriceAbout 370 EURAbout 90 EUR
SAR0.91 W/kg (head)     1.54 W/kg (body)0.68 W/kg (head)     1.02 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-0.99 W/kg (head)     0.96 W/kg (body)

Wiko View5

  • Potentially lower price point
  • May offer slightly longer battery life due to lower power chipset
  • Functional for basic smartphone tasks

  • Significantly slower performance
  • Less responsive user interface
  • Inferior camera image processing

Nokia 5.4

  • Faster and more responsive performance
  • Better camera image quality
  • More future-proofed platform

  • Slower 10W charging
  • Potentially higher price
  • May not offer significantly better battery life

Display Comparison

Neither Wiko nor Nokia provide detailed display specifications beyond resolution. However, the choice of chipsets suggests a difference in display capabilities. The Snapdragon 662 typically supports higher refresh rate displays, though the Nokia 5.4 doesn't utilize this. The Helio A25 is more limited, likely resulting in a standard 60Hz panel on the View5. Color accuracy and brightness are likely comparable, given both phones target the same price bracket, but the 662’s ISP could offer better image processing for display output.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specs, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Snapdragon 662’s image signal processor (ISP) is considerably more advanced than the Helio A25’s. This means the Nokia 5.4 will likely produce better image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions, with improved dynamic range and noise reduction. The ISP also enables features like faster autofocus and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. While both phones likely feature similar sensor resolutions in their main cameras, the Nokia’s processing capabilities will give it an edge.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Nokia 5.4’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11nm) is a significant step up from the Wiko View5’s MediaTek Helio A25 (12nm). The 11nm process node of the Snapdragon 662 offers better power efficiency and thermal performance. The Snapdragon 662’s CPU configuration – 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver – provides a performance advantage over the Helio A25’s 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user interface on the Nokia 5.4. While both are octa-core, the architectural differences and clock speeds favor Qualcomm.

Battery Life

Battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, making a direct comparison difficult. However, the Nokia 5.4’s 10W wired charging is significantly slower than what’s becoming standard, even in this price segment. The Helio A25’s lower power demands *could* offset this, potentially offering comparable battery life despite the slower charging. However, the Snapdragon 662’s efficiency gains, even under load, likely mean the Nokia 5.4 will offer competitive battery performance, but users will need to plan charging overnight.

Buying Guide

Buy the Wiko View5 if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media, and your budget is extremely limited. It’s a viable option for first-time smartphone users or as a temporary device. Buy the Nokia 5.4 if you prefer a more responsive user experience, occasional gaming, and a more future-proofed platform, even if it means spending a bit more and accepting slower charging speeds.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Nokia 5.4 struggle with popular apps like Facebook or WhatsApp?
The Snapdragon 662 in the Nokia 5.4 is capable of running apps like Facebook and WhatsApp smoothly, even with multiple apps open. While it won’t offer a flagship-level experience, it provides a significantly more responsive experience than the Wiko View5’s Helio A25, which may exhibit lag and slowdowns with these apps.
❓ Is the Nokia 5.4 a good choice for mobile gaming?
The Nokia 5.4 can handle casual mobile games without issue. However, demanding titles like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty: Mobile will require lower graphics settings and may still experience occasional frame drops. The Helio A25 in the Wiko View5 is less suited for gaming, even on low settings.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Nokia 5.4 with the 10W charger?
Given the 10W charging speed, expect a full charge from 0% to 100% to take approximately 3-4 hours, depending on battery capacity. This is considerably slower than many modern smartphones, so overnight charging is recommended.
❓ Does the Wiko View5 support software updates?
Wiko’s software update track record is inconsistent. It’s unlikely the View5 will receive major Android version updates, and security patches may be infrequent. The Nokia 5.4, being part of the Android One program, is guaranteed at least two years of Android version updates and three years of security patches, offering a more secure and up-to-date experience.