The Wiko View5 Plus and Samsung Galaxy A41 represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, but they take different approaches to achieving this. This comparison dives deep into their specifications to determine which device offers the best value for your money, focusing on real-world performance implications.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A41 emerges as the better choice. While both phones share a similar endurance rating, the A41’s Helio P65 chipset, featuring Cortex-A75 cores, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the View5 Plus’s Helio P35, making it more suitable for multitasking and demanding applications.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September. Released 2020, September | 2020, March 18. Released 2020, May 22 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 166 x 76.8 x 9.3 mm (6.54 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) | 149.9 x 69.8 x 7.9 mm (5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 152 g (5.36 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~268 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~431 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~81.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 89.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6768 Helio P65 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, One UI 4.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, (wide), AF
8 MP, (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 25 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.9µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 3500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Aurora Blue, Iceland Silver | Prism Crush Black, Prism Crush Silver, Prism Crush Blue, Prism Crush Red |
| Models | W-V850-EEA | SM-A415F/DSN, SM-A415F/DSM, SM-A415F, SM-A415F/DS, SCV48, SC-41A |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 290 EUR |
| SAR | 0.91 W/kg (head) 1.54 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 1.50 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 102h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-30.5 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 170044 (v8)
GeekBench: 1175 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Wiko View5 Plus
- Potentially lower price point
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- Decent battery endurance
- Less powerful processor
- Likely lower quality display
- Limited camera capabilities (assumed)
Samsung Galaxy A41
- More powerful processor for smoother performance
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Faster charging support
- Potentially higher price
- Samsung’s software can include bloatware
- Similar battery endurance to the Wiko View5 Plus
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A41 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 624 nits, compared to the Wiko View5 Plus (brightness data unavailable). This difference is crucial for outdoor usability, where the A41 will remain far more legible in direct sunlight. While both displays are described as having an 'infinite' contrast ratio (a marketing term), the A41’s higher peak brightness contributes to a more vibrant and visually appealing image. The lack of detailed display specs for the View5 Plus suggests a lower-quality panel overall.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size, aperture, or feature lists, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given Samsung’s generally stronger image processing algorithms, the A41 is likely to produce more consistently pleasing photos, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The prevalence of low-resolution auxiliary cameras on budget phones suggests avoiding expectations for high-quality macro or depth sensing on either device.
Performance
The core difference between these two phones lies in their chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A41’s Mediatek Helio P65 utilizes a more modern CPU architecture with 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This contrasts with the Wiko View5 Plus’s Helio P35, which features 4x 2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The Cortex-A75 cores in the P65 offer a substantial performance uplift in single-core tasks and improved efficiency, resulting in a snappier user experience. While both are 12nm chips, the architectural improvements in the P65 translate to better overall responsiveness.
Battery Life
Both the Wiko View5 Plus and Samsung Galaxy A41 achieve an endurance rating of 102 hours, indicating similar battery life under typical usage. However, the A41 supports 15W wired charging, which will allow for faster top-ups compared to the View5 Plus (charging speed data unavailable). While the mAh capacity isn’t specified for either phone, the A41’s more efficient chipset could contribute to slightly longer real-world usage despite potentially having a similar battery size.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko View5 Plus if you prioritize a simple, no-frills experience and are primarily focused on basic communication and light usage. It’s a viable option for first-time smartphone users or those needing a secondary device. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A41 if you value smoother performance, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a more refined user experience, even if it means spending slightly more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Mediatek Helio P65 in the Galaxy A41 capable of handling modern mobile games?
The Helio P65 is a capable chipset for casual gaming and can handle many popular titles at medium settings. However, demanding games like Genshin Impact may require lower graphics settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The P65’s Cortex-A75 cores provide a performance boost over the P35 in the Wiko View5 Plus, making the A41 the better choice for gaming.
❓ How does Samsung’s One UI affect the performance of the Galaxy A41?
Samsung’s One UI is a feature-rich software experience, but it can be resource-intensive. While the Helio P65 is capable, One UI’s animations and background processes may slightly impact performance compared to a more streamlined Android build. However, Samsung has optimized One UI in recent versions, and the A41’s chipset is generally sufficient to handle the software without significant lag.
❓ Does the Wiko View5 Plus receive regular software updates?
Wiko’s software update track record is less consistent than Samsung’s. Users should expect fewer and potentially slower updates for the View5 Plus, which could impact security and feature availability over time. Samsung typically provides more frequent security patches and software upgrades for its A-series devices.
