The Wiko View5 Plus and Nokia 7.2 represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a functional Android experience without breaking the bank, they take different approaches to achieving this goal. The Wiko prioritizes a newer, albeit less powerful, chipset, while the Nokia 7.2 leverages the more established Snapdragon 660. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Nokia 7.2 emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 660 chipset provides a noticeably smoother experience, particularly in multitasking and gaming, despite both phones sharing an identical 69-hour endurance rating. While the Wiko View5 Plus is newer, the performance gap justifies the Nokia's slight edge.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - ROW |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - ROW |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps or LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - IN |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September. Released 2020, September | 2019, September 05. Released 2019, September 23 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 166 x 76.8 x 9.3 mm (6.54 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) | 159.9 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~268 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~81.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, Android One |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | Zeiss optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, (wide), AF
8 MP, (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Zeiss optics, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes (excl. India) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Aurora Blue, Iceland Silver | Cyan Green, Charcoal, Ice |
| Models | W-V850-EEA | TA-1193, TA-1178, TA-1196, TA-1181 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 240 EUR |
| SAR | 0.91 W/kg (head) 1.54 W/kg (body) | 1.15 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.44 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.0dB / Crosstalk -93.4dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 69h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1342:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.6 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 139495 (v7), 164484 (v8)
GeekBench: 5440 (v4.4), 1398 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Wiko View5 Plus
- Potentially newer software updates (Wiko's update policy is variable)
- Slightly more power-efficient chipset (12nm process)
- May be available at a lower price point
- Significantly weaker CPU and GPU performance
- Less refined user experience
- Uncertain long-term software support
Nokia 7.2
- More powerful Snapdragon 660 processor
- Smoother multitasking and gaming performance
- Established brand reputation and software support
- Older chipset architecture
- 14nm process node is less power efficient
- Slower charging speed (10W)
Display Comparison
Both devices offer a similar visual experience, with the Nokia 7.2 boasting a measured peak brightness of 585 nits and a 1342:1 contrast ratio. While the Wiko View5 Plus’s display specifications are not provided, it’s reasonable to assume a similar level of quality given its market positioning. The Nokia’s higher brightness is beneficial for outdoor visibility, making it the preferable choice for users who frequently use their phones in direct sunlight. The contrast ratio, while identical on paper, suggests a similar level of black depth and color vibrancy on both devices.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given Nokia’s historical emphasis on camera quality, it’s likely the Nokia 7.2 benefits from more refined image processing algorithms. The absence of specific details suggests neither phone will excel in low-light photography or offer advanced features like optical image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Nokia 7.2’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm) is built on a larger process node than the Wiko View5 Plus’s MediaTek Helio P35 (12nm). However, the Snapdragon 660’s Kryo 260 cores – 4x2.2 GHz Gold and 4x1.8 GHz Silver – offer a significant architectural advantage over the Helio P35’s Cortex-A53 configuration (4x2.35 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz). This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better performance in demanding applications. The Snapdragon 660’s Adreno 512 GPU also provides a more capable graphics experience, making the Nokia 7.2 the better choice for mobile gaming.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both the Wiko View5 Plus and Nokia 7.2 share an identical endurance rating of 69 hours. This suggests similar battery optimization and power efficiency despite the chipset differences. The Nokia 7.2 features 10W wired charging, while the Wiko’s charging speed is unspecified. Given the similar battery life, the Nokia’s 10W charging provides a known quantity, allowing users to estimate charging times. The lack of fast charging on either device means both will require several hours to fully recharge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko View5 Plus if you prioritize having the latest chipset, even if it means sacrificing some performance. It's a reasonable option for very basic smartphone tasks like calls, texts, and light social media. Buy the Nokia 7.2 if you value a more responsive user experience, better app loading times, and a more capable processor for everyday tasks and occasional gaming. The Nokia 7.2 offers a more polished and reliable experience overall.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 660 in the Nokia 7.2 still capable of running modern apps smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 660 remains a capable processor for everyday tasks and most popular apps. While it won't deliver flagship-level performance, it provides a significantly smoother experience than the Helio P35, especially when multitasking or running demanding applications like social media or navigation.
❓ How does the 12nm process of the Helio P35 compare to the 14nm process of the Snapdragon 660 in terms of heat generation?
While a smaller process node (12nm vs 14nm) generally indicates better power efficiency, the Snapdragon 660's more efficient CPU architecture and GPU offset this difference. In real-world usage, the Nokia 7.2 is unlikely to experience significant thermal throttling, while the Wiko View5 Plus may struggle under sustained load.
❓ Does the Nokia 7.2 receive regular software updates and security patches?
Nokia is known for its commitment to providing timely software updates and security patches, even for its budget devices. This is a significant advantage over many other brands in this price range, ensuring your phone remains secure and up-to-date with the latest features.
