The Wiko View5 Plus and Motorola Moto G 5G represent two approaches to affordable 5G connectivity. The Wiko aims for a low entry price, while the Motorola attempts to balance features with 5G capability. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which device offers the best experience for budget-conscious consumers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G 5G is the superior choice. Its Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G chipset delivers significantly better performance and 5G capabilities than the Wiko View5 Plus’s MediaTek Helio P35. While both phones offer similar battery endurance, the Moto G 5G’s faster 20W charging provides a more convenient experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September. Released 2020, September | 2020, November 05. Released 2020, December 07 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 166 x 76.8 x 9.3 mm (6.54 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) | 166.1 x 76.1 x 9.9 mm (6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~268 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~81.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 2GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, (wide), AF
8 MP, (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
2 MP (macro), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Aurora Blue, Iceland Silver | Volcanic Gray, Frosted Silver |
| Models | W-V850-EEA | - |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 90 EUR |
| SAR | 0.91 W/kg (head) 1.54 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 131h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1419:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.1 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 312461 (v8)
GeekBench: 1980 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Wiko View5 Plus
- Lowest possible price point
- Acceptable battery endurance
- Functional for basic tasks
- Outdated and underpowered chipset
- Likely poor gaming performance
- Slow charging (assumed)
- Limited 5G capabilities
Motorola Moto G 5G
- Significantly faster and more efficient processor
- Reliable 5G connectivity
- Faster 20W charging
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Higher price than Wiko View5 Plus
- Camera performance likely limited by budget sensors
- May still struggle with very demanding games at max settings
Display Comparison
Both devices share a contrast ratio of 1419:1, suggesting similar panel characteristics in terms of black levels. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 484 nits, a substantial advantage over the Wiko View5 Plus (brightness data unavailable). This higher brightness translates to better visibility outdoors and in brightly lit environments. While both likely utilize IPS LCD technology given the price points, the Moto G 5G’s superior brightness makes it the more usable display in a wider range of conditions.
Camera Comparison
Both phones list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the price bracket, it’s reasonable to assume both utilize budget sensors. The Motorola Moto G 5G likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 750G, which offers superior image processing capabilities compared to the ISP found in the Helio P35. This could result in better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality on the Moto G 5G. We would caution against expecting flagship-level camera performance from either device.
Performance
The performance gap between these two phones is significant. The Motorola Moto G 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G (8nm) is a far more capable chipset than the Wiko View5 Plus’s MediaTek Helio P35 (12nm). The Snapdragon 750G features Kryo 570 cores, offering a more modern architecture and higher clock speeds (2x2.2 GHz & 6x1.8 GHz) compared to the Helio P35’s Cortex-A53 cores (4x2.35 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz). The 8nm process node of the Snapdragon 750G also contributes to better power efficiency and thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained tasks. This means the Moto G 5G will handle multitasking, gaming, and demanding apps with greater ease.
Battery Life
Both the Wiko View5 Plus and Motorola Moto G 5G achieve an endurance rating of 131 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G offers a significant advantage with its 20W wired charging. The Wiko View5 Plus’s charging speed is unspecified, but likely slower. This means the Moto G 5G can replenish its battery much faster, minimizing downtime and providing a more convenient user experience. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging of the Moto G 5G effectively mitigates any potential capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko View5 Plus if you prioritize absolute lowest cost and basic smartphone functionality, and 5G is not a critical requirement. You'll be sacrificing performance and future-proofing. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G if you want a smoother user experience, reliable 5G connectivity, and faster charging, even if it means spending a bit more. It’s the better option for users who stream video, play mobile games, or plan to keep their phone for several years.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Motorola Moto G 5G handle popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Snapdragon 750G in the Moto G 5G is capable of running PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile, but you may need to adjust graphics settings to medium or low for a consistently smooth experience. The Wiko View5 Plus’s Helio P35 will likely struggle with these titles, even at the lowest settings.
❓ How much faster is the 5G connectivity on the Motorola Moto G 5G compared to 4G?
The Motorola Moto G 5G utilizes the Snapdragon 750G, which has an integrated 5G modem. This provides significantly faster download and upload speeds compared to 4G, assuming you are in an area with 5G coverage. Expect speeds several times faster than 4G, enabling quicker downloads, smoother streaming, and lower latency for online gaming.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs on both phones a cause for concern?
Yes, the limited camera information suggests both phones utilize budget camera systems. Don't expect exceptional image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The Motorola Moto G 5G likely has an edge due to Qualcomm's image processing capabilities, but both are best suited for casual snapshots.
