The Wiko View4 and Samsung Galaxy A11 represent the lower end of the smartphone market, targeting users prioritizing affordability. However, beneath the similar price points lie key differences in chipset architecture and features. This comparison dives deep into those distinctions to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Samsung Galaxy A11 is the slightly better choice due to its 15W fast charging capability, a convenience the Wiko View4 lacks. However, the View4’s more efficient Mediatek Helio A25 chipset offers a potential edge in sustained performance and battery longevity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 - SM-A115U |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, February. Released 2020, February | 2020, March 13. Released 2020, May 01 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.52 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 161.4 x 76.3 x 8 mm (6.35 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 177 g (6.24 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~268 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits (peak) | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762D Helio A25 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM450 Snapdragon 450 (14 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 506 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, One UI Core 4.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 13 MP, (wide)
5 MP, 114˚, (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | 13 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), AF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Blue, Cosmic Gold, Cosmic Green | Black, White, Blue, Red |
| Models | - | SM-A115F/DS, SM-A115F, SM-A115M, SM-A115M/DS, SM-A115U, SM-A115A, SM-A115AZ, SM-A115U1, SM-A115W, SM-A115AP, SM-S115DL |
| Price | About 160 EUR | About 160 EUR |
| SAR | 0.38 W/kg (head) 1.69 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.52 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
Wiko View4
- Potentially better power efficiency with the Helio A25 chipset.
- More modern 12nm fabrication process.
- Split core CPU configuration *could* improve multitasking.
- Lacks fast charging support.
- Likely less refined software experience compared to Samsung.
Samsung Galaxy A11
- 15W fast charging for quicker top-ups.
- Samsung’s established brand and software ecosystem.
- Potentially better camera image processing.
- Less power-efficient 14nm Snapdragon 450 chipset.
- May experience more thermal throttling under sustained load.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. Specifics like resolution and brightness are not provided, but we can assume both offer basic viewing experiences. The lack of high refresh rates or advanced panel technologies like LTPO is expected. Bezels are likely substantial on both, maximizing screen real estate is not a priority here.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance will be similarly limited on both devices. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make definitive claims. However, the inclusion of a 15W charger on the A11 suggests Samsung allocated more budget to features beyond the core processor. Both phones likely feature a primary camera supplemented by lower-resolution sensors for depth or macro photography – features that often deliver limited practical benefit. Image processing will likely favor Samsung’s typically vibrant style.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Wiko View4’s Mediatek MT6762D Helio A25 (12nm) utilizes a more modern fabrication process than the Samsung Galaxy A11’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (14nm). While both are octa-core Cortex-A53 based CPUs, the 12nm process generally translates to better power efficiency. The A25’s split core configuration (4x1.8GHz & 4x1.5GHz) *could* offer slightly better multi-tasking performance, but the real-world difference will be minimal. The Snapdragon 450’s consistent 1.8GHz clock speed might provide a marginal boost in single-core tasks. Neither chipset is designed for demanding gaming; expect basic app performance and light multitasking.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Wiko View4’s more efficient Helio A25 chipset has the potential to deliver longer battery life on a similar capacity battery. The Samsung Galaxy A11’s 15W wired charging is a significant advantage, allowing for quicker top-ups. The View4 likely relies on slower 10W or 5W charging, meaning a full charge will take considerably longer.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko View4 if you prioritize maximizing battery life and appreciate a potentially cooler running phone during extended use, even if it means slower charging. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A11 if you value the convenience of faster 15W charging and are a Samsung ecosystem user, benefiting from their software features and brand recognition.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 450 in the Galaxy A11 overheat during prolonged use of apps like Facebook or WhatsApp?
The Snapdragon 450 is a relatively low-power chip, but its 14nm process is less efficient than the Helio A25. While it’s unlikely to overheat catastrophically, you might experience some performance throttling during extended use of demanding apps. The Wiko View4’s A25 chipset is more likely to maintain consistent performance for longer.
❓ Does the Wiko View4 support any form of fast charging, or is it limited to standard 5W charging?
The provided specifications do not mention fast charging support for the Wiko View4. It’s highly probable that it relies on standard 5W or 10W charging, resulting in significantly longer charging times compared to the Samsung Galaxy A11’s 15W capability.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance between the Helio A25 and Snapdragon 450 noticeable in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
The difference in performance will be subtle for typical everyday tasks. Both chipsets are capable of handling browsing, social media, and messaging without significant lag. However, the A25’s efficiency might result in slightly smoother scrolling and app switching over time.
