The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. Both the Wiko View4 and the Realme C33 2023 aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price. However, they take different approaches to achieving this, primarily through their chipset choices. This comparison dissects those differences and helps you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Realme C33 2023 is the better choice. While both phones share a similar price point, the Unisoc Tiger T612 offers a noticeable performance uplift over the MediaTek Helio A25 in the Wiko View4, particularly in multi-tasking and app responsiveness. The 10W charging is a drawback, but the CPU advantage is significant.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, February. Released 2020, February | 2023, March 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, March 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.52 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 164.2 x 75.7 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762D Helio A25 (12 nm) | Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 12, Realme UI S |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 5 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 13 MP, (wide)
5 MP, 114˚, (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | - | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Blue, Cosmic Gold, Cosmic Green | Sandy Gold, Aqua Blue, Night Sea |
| Models | - | RMX3627 |
| Price | About 160 EUR | About 110 EUR |
| SAR | 0.38 W/kg (head) 1.69 W/kg (body) | - |
Wiko View4
- Potentially lower price point
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- Reliable for basic communication
- Outdated Helio A25 chipset
- Slower performance compared to the Realme C33 2023
- Likely limited software support
Realme C33 2023
- More powerful Unisoc Tiger T612 chipset
- Improved multitasking and app responsiveness
- Better long-term performance potential
- Slow 10W charging
- May be slightly more expensive than the Wiko View4
- Software experience can be bloated with pre-installed apps
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both are likely utilizing LCD panels, common in this price bracket. Specifics like brightness and color accuracy are unavailable, but we can assume both offer adequate, but not exceptional, viewing experiences. Bezels are likely to be noticeable on both, prioritizing cost reduction over premium aesthetics. The lack of high refresh rates is standard for this segment.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar on both devices, relying heavily on software processing. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make definitive claims. However, the inclusion of even a basic 8MP or 13MP main sensor on the Realme C33 2023 would likely outperform the Wiko View4’s camera, given the processing capabilities of the T612 chipset. The prevalence of 2MP macro and depth sensors on both devices suggests limited utility; these are primarily for marketing purposes.
Performance
This is where the Realme C33 2023 pulls ahead. The Unisoc Tiger T612 features two Cortex-A75 cores alongside six Cortex-A55 cores, a significant architectural upgrade over the Wiko View4’s all-Cortex-A53 configuration. The A75 cores provide a substantial boost in single-core performance, translating to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. While both chipsets are built on a 12nm process, the newer architecture of the T612 offers better efficiency. The Wiko View4’s Helio A25 is adequate for basic tasks, but will struggle with demanding applications. The Realme C33 2023 will provide a more fluid user experience.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device, but both likely house around a 5000mAh battery, typical for this price range. The Realme C33 2023’s 10W charging is slow by modern standards, requiring several hours for a full charge. The Wiko View4’s charging speed is unknown, but likely similar. Battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns, but the more efficient Unisoc T612 in the Realme C33 2023 may offer slightly longer screen-on time.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko View4 if you prioritize a simple, no-frills experience and are primarily focused on basic communication tasks like calls, texts, and light social media. It's a viable option for first-time smartphone users or those needing a secondary device. Buy the Realme C33 2023 if you want a more responsive and capable device for everyday use, including moderate gaming and running multiple apps simultaneously. The improved CPU architecture makes it a better long-term investment.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Realme C33 2023 be able to run popular games like PUBG Mobile?
The Unisoc Tiger T612 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but likely at lower graphics settings and frame rates to maintain stable performance. Expect to play at 'Smooth' graphics and 'Medium' frame rate for a playable experience. The Wiko View4’s Helio A25 will struggle significantly with PUBG Mobile.
❓ How does the Unisoc Tiger T612 compare to other chipsets in this price range, like the MediaTek Helio G35?
The Unisoc Tiger T612 generally outperforms the MediaTek Helio G35, offering a more balanced CPU and GPU configuration. The G35 focuses more on GPU performance, but the T612’s A75 cores provide a noticeable advantage in everyday tasks and multitasking. Both are entry-level chipsets, but the T612 is a step up.
❓ Is the 10W charging on the Realme C33 2023 a major drawback?
Yes, 10W charging is quite slow compared to modern standards. Expect a full charge to take around 3-4 hours. However, given the likely battery capacity (around 5000mAh), this may be acceptable for overnight charging. It's a trade-off for the more powerful chipset.
