The Wiko View4 and Nokia 3.4 represent two compelling options in the ultra-budget smartphone space. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at a price point that won't break the bank, but they achieve this with different approaches to core hardware. This comparison dissects the key differences, focusing on the chipset architecture and its impact on real-world performance.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and future-proofing, the Nokia 3.4 emerges as the better choice. Its Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, built on an 11nm process and featuring Cortex-A73 cores, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Wiko View4’s MediaTek Helio A25, despite the latter’s octa-core configuration.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 13, 28, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, February. Released 2020, February | 2020, September 22. Released 2020, October 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.52 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 161 x 76 x 8.7 mm (6.34 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~81.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762D Helio A25 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 13 MP, (wide)
5 MP, 114˚, (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | 13 MP, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Blue, Cosmic Gold, Cosmic Green | Fjord, Dusk, Charcoal |
| Models | - | TA-1288, TA-1285, TA-1283 |
| Price | About 160 EUR | About 100 EUR |
| SAR | 0.38 W/kg (head) 1.69 W/kg (body) | 0.83 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.36 W/kg (head) 1.56 W/kg (body) |
Wiko View4
- Potentially lower price point
- Octa-core processor (though less efficient)
- Likely lightweight design
- Less powerful chipset (Helio A25)
- Less efficient processor (12nm)
- Potentially slower software updates
Nokia 3.4
- More powerful chipset (Snapdragon 460)
- More efficient processor (11nm)
- Qualcomm ISP for better image processing
- Slower 10W charging
- Potentially slightly higher price
- May have more bloatware
Display Comparison
Neither Wiko nor Nokia provide display specifications beyond resolution. However, given the price bracket, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The absence of details like peak brightness or color gamut coverage suggests neither phone excels in display quality. The focus here is clearly on cost reduction, meaning users shouldn't expect vibrant colors or excellent outdoor visibility. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both devices.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is difficult. However, it’s safe to assume both phones feature budget-oriented camera setups. The Nokia 3.4 benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), which generally delivers better image processing and noise reduction than MediaTek’s equivalent. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device suggests low-light performance will be limited. Focusing on the primary sensor resolution is misleading; image quality is more dependent on sensor size and software optimization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Nokia 3.4’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 (11nm) utilizes four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 1.8GHz alongside four Cortex-A53 cores. This architecture provides a significant uplift in single-core performance compared to the Wiko View4’s MediaTek Helio A25 (12nm), which relies solely on four Cortex-A53 cores at 1.8GHz and another four at 1.5GHz. The 11nm process node of the Snapdragon 460 also contributes to better power efficiency. While both are octa-core, the architectural difference means the Nokia 3.4 will handle multitasking and app launches more smoothly. The Helio A25 is adequate for basic tasks, but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, but both likely house batteries in the 4000-5000mAh range, typical for this price segment. The Nokia 3.4’s Snapdragon 460, with its 11nm process, offers better power efficiency, potentially translating to longer battery life. However, the Nokia 3.4 is limited to 10W wired charging, which is significantly slower than what some competitors offer. The Wiko View4’s charging speed is also unknown, but likely similar, meaning neither phone offers fast charging capabilities.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko View4 if you need a basic smartphone for extremely light tasks like calls, texts, and occasional social media browsing, and are prioritizing the absolute lowest possible price. Buy the Nokia 3.4 if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for everyday tasks, occasional gaming, and appreciate the benefits of Qualcomm’s optimized software ecosystem, even if it means a slightly higher upfront cost.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Nokia 3.4 struggle with popular apps like Facebook or WhatsApp?
While not a powerhouse, the Snapdragon 460 in the Nokia 3.4 is generally sufficient for running social media apps like Facebook and WhatsApp smoothly. The Cortex-A73 cores provide a performance boost over the Wiko View4’s Helio A25, minimizing lag and ensuring a reasonably responsive experience.
❓ Is the Wiko View4 suitable for playing mobile games?
The Wiko View4’s Helio A25 is not ideal for gaming. While it can handle very basic 2D games, more demanding titles will likely experience significant lag and frame rate drops. The Nokia 3.4, while still not a gaming phone, offers a slightly better experience due to its more powerful chipset.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Nokia 3.4 with the 10W charger?
With the included 10W charger, expect the Nokia 3.4 to take approximately 3-4 hours to fully charge from 0% to 100%. This is a relatively slow charging speed compared to modern smartphones, but typical for devices in this price range.
❓ Does the Nokia 3.4 receive regular software updates?
Nokia is known for providing relatively clean Android builds and timely security updates, even on their budget devices. While major Android version updates may be limited, the Nokia 3.4 is likely to receive regular security patches, enhancing its long-term security and usability.
