The Wiko View4 and Infinix Smart 4c represent the extreme end of the smartphone price spectrum, targeting users prioritizing affordability above all else. Both devices rely on MediaTek’s Helio series of chipsets, but a key difference in processing power dictates which phone delivers a smoother, more responsive experience for everyday tasks. This comparison dissects the core hardware to determine which offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user needing a basic smartphone for calls, messaging, and light social media, the Wiko View4 emerges as the better choice. Its Mediatek Helio A25 chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the quad-core Helio A22 in the Infinix Smart 4c, resulting in a more fluid user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, February. Released 2020, February | 2019, November. Released 2019, December |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.52 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 167 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.57 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits (peak) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762D Helio A25 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 9.0 (Pie) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 8 MP
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | Dual-LED flash |
| Triple | 13 MP, (wide)
5 MP, 114˚, (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Blue, Cosmic Gold, Cosmic Green | Midnight Black, Quetzal Cyan, Cosmic Purple |
| Models | - | X653C |
| Price | About 160 EUR | - |
| SAR | 0.38 W/kg (head) 1.69 W/kg (body) | - |
Wiko View4
- Octa-core processor offers better multitasking.
- More responsive user experience.
- Potentially better camera image processing.
- May be slightly more expensive than the Infinix Smart 4c.
- Detailed specifications (screen, camera) are limited.
Infinix Smart 4c
- Likely the most affordable option.
- Sufficient for very basic smartphone tasks.
- 12nm process node offers reasonable efficiency.
- Quad-core processor struggles with multitasking.
- Slower app loading times.
- Less responsive user interface.
Display Comparison
Neither Wiko nor Infinix provide detailed display specifications beyond resolution. However, given the price point, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The focus here isn't on display quality, but rather the processing power needed to drive the UI smoothly. A more powerful chipset, like the one in the View4, will contribute to smoother scrolling and animations, even on a basic display.
Camera Comparison
Both devices likely feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. However, the processing power of the Helio A25 in the Wiko View4 will likely result in faster image processing and potentially better image quality, particularly in low-light conditions, due to more efficient noise reduction algorithms. The presence of a more capable chipset allows for more sophisticated image processing without significant lag.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Wiko View4’s Mediatek MT6762D Helio A25 boasts an octa-core CPU configuration – four cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and four at 1.5 GHz, all Cortex-A53. This contrasts sharply with the Infinix Smart 4c’s Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22, which features a quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 setup. While the A22 has a higher clock speed per core, the A25’s eight cores provide superior multitasking capabilities. The A25’s architecture allows for more efficient task distribution, leading to a more responsive experience when switching between apps. The 12nm process node is shared by both, meaning thermal efficiency is comparable, but the A25 will likely handle sustained loads better.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified in the provided data. However, given the target market, both phones likely feature batteries in the 3000-4000 mAh range. The Helio A25’s more efficient architecture, despite having more cores, could potentially lead to slightly better battery life in the Wiko View4, as it can complete tasks more quickly and return to an idle state sooner. Charging wattage is also unknown, making a direct comparison impossible.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko View4 if you need a phone capable of handling multiple apps simultaneously without significant lag, or if you anticipate using slightly more demanding applications like basic photo editing. Buy the Infinix Smart 4c if your primary needs are limited to calls, texts, and very light web browsing, and you are prioritizing the absolute lowest possible price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Wiko View4 handle popular social media apps like Facebook and WhatsApp smoothly?
Yes, the Wiko View4’s octa-core Helio A25 chipset is well-equipped to handle the demands of popular social media apps like Facebook and WhatsApp. The additional cores provide the processing power needed for smooth scrolling, quick loading times, and reliable performance even with multiple apps open.
❓ Is the Infinix Smart 4c suitable for someone who rarely uses their smartphone beyond calls and texts?
Absolutely. The Infinix Smart 4c is perfectly adequate for users who primarily need a phone for basic communication. Its quad-core Helio A22 chipset is sufficient for making calls, sending texts, and checking basic notifications, making it a viable option for those with minimal smartphone requirements.
❓ Can either of these phones run multiple apps at the same time without slowing down?
The Wiko View4 is significantly better suited for multitasking. Its octa-core processor allows it to handle several apps concurrently with less lag. The Infinix Smart 4c, with its quad-core processor, will struggle with even a moderate number of open applications.
