The Wiko View4 Lite and Samsung Galaxy A02 represent the absolute bottom end of the smartphone market, targeting users prioritizing affordability above all else. While both aim to deliver basic smartphone functionality, significant differences in their underlying hardware dictate vastly different user experiences. This comparison dissects those differences, focusing on performance, battery life, and overall value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Wiko View4 Lite emerges as the stronger choice. Its Mediatek Helio A25 chipset, with its octa-core configuration, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Samsung Galaxy A02’s quad-core MT6739W, making it more responsive for everyday tasks and light multitasking. While both are entry-level, the Wiko offers a smoother experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020. Released 2020 | 2021, January 27 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, January 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 167 x 76.8 x 8.5 mm (6.57 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 164 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 174 g (6.14 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~80.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits (peak) | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762D Helio A25 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6739W (28 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8100 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, One UI Core 3.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/1.9, (wide), AF
2 MP (macro) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash |
| Triple | 13 MP
5 MP
2 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP, f/2.0 |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Deep Blue, Deep Green, Deep Gold | Black, Blue |
| Models | - | SM-A022F, SM-A022F/DS, SM-A022M, SM-A022M/DS, SM-A022G, SM-A022G/DS |
| Price | About 80 EUR | € 97.46 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.65 W/kg (head) 1.71 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 32GB 2GB RAM | - | $ 149.99 |
| 32GB 3GB RAM | - | $ 129.99 |
| 64GB 3GB RAM | - | $ 199.99 |
| RENEWED | - | £ 113.00 |
Wiko View4 Lite
- Significantly faster processor for smoother performance
- More efficient chipset for potentially better battery life
- Octa-core CPU enables better multitasking
- Brand recognition is lower than Samsung
- Display specifications are unknown and likely basic
Samsung Galaxy A02
- Strong brand recognition and trust
- Multiple storage/RAM configurations offer some flexibility
- Widely available and often heavily discounted
- Significantly slower processor leading to lag and frustration
- Less efficient chipset impacting battery life
- Quad-core CPU struggles with multitasking
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common cost-saving measure in this segment. However, specifics like resolution and brightness are missing. The A02’s price variations suggest different storage options, but don’t imply display improvements. The focus here is on functionality, not visual fidelity. Expect basic viewing experiences on both.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance on both devices will be limited. Details are sparse, but it’s safe to assume both rely on basic sensors. The A02’s available configurations (32GB/2GB, 32GB/3GB, 64GB/3GB) don’t specify camera sensor differences. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the A02 is largely marketing fluff; its image quality will be minimal. Expect acceptable photos in good lighting conditions, but poor performance in low light on both devices. The Wiko’s larger processor may offer slightly better image processing capabilities, but the sensor itself is the limiting factor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Wiko View4 Lite’s Mediatek MT6762D Helio A25 (12nm) is a significant upgrade over the Samsung Galaxy A02’s Mediatek MT6739W (28nm). The A25’s octa-core CPU (4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) provides substantially more processing power than the A02’s quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53. The 12nm process node of the Helio A25 also contributes to better power efficiency. This translates to snappier app launches, smoother scrolling, and a more responsive overall experience on the Wiko. The A02 will struggle with even moderate multitasking.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the more efficient 12nm process of the Helio A25 in the Wiko View4 Lite suggests it will likely offer comparable or slightly better battery life than the A02, despite potentially having a similar capacity. Charging wattage is also unknown for both, meaning 0-100% charge times will likely be lengthy, exceeding two hours in both cases.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko View4 Lite if you need a phone capable of handling more than just basic calling and texting. Its superior processor makes it suitable for light social media browsing, music streaming, and occasional gaming. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A02 if your primary concern is brand recognition and you only require a phone for essential communication, and are willing to accept significantly slower performance and limited multitasking capabilities. The A02’s varying RAM/storage configurations offer some flexibility, but don’t overcome the core performance deficit.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Samsung Galaxy A02 struggle with popular apps like Facebook or WhatsApp?
Yes, the Galaxy A02’s MT6739W processor is quite limited. While it can run these apps, expect noticeable lag when switching between them or loading content. The Wiko View4 Lite’s Helio A25 will provide a much smoother experience with these commonly used applications.
❓ Is the 64GB storage option on the Samsung Galaxy A02 worth the extra cost?
If you plan to store many photos, videos, or apps, the 64GB option is recommended. However, the core performance limitations of the MT6739W processor remain unchanged. The extra storage won’t address the phone’s sluggishness. Consider the Wiko View4 Lite if performance is your priority.
❓ Can either of these phones handle basic mobile games like Candy Crush or Subway Surfers?
Both phones can *run* these games, but the experience will differ. The Wiko View4 Lite will offer smoother gameplay with fewer frame drops due to its more powerful processor. The Galaxy A02 may experience significant lag and stuttering, especially during more demanding sections of the game.
❓ What kind of charging speeds should I expect from these phones?
Neither manufacturer specifies charging wattage. Expect slow charging speeds – likely exceeding two hours to fully charge from 0% to 100%. Both phones likely ship with a basic 5W charger.
