The Wiko View4 Lite and Nokia C210 represent the ultra-budget end of the smartphone spectrum. Both aim to deliver essential functionality at a minimal cost, but they take different approaches under the hood. The Wiko relies on MediaTek’s Helio A25, while the Nokia opts for Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 662. This comparison dives deep into the architectural differences and real-world implications of these chipsets to determine which phone offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Nokia C210 emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 662, built on an 11nm process, provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Wiko View4 Lite’s Helio A25 (12nm). This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and a more responsive user experience, justifying a potential price premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020. Released 2020 | 2023, August 16 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 167 x 76.8 x 8.5 mm (6.57 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 159.5 x 73.9 x 8.6 mm (6.28 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 174 g (6.14 oz) | 167.8 g (5.93 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~273 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~80.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits (peak) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762D Helio A25 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash |
| Triple | 13 MP
5 MP
2 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | - | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Yes |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Ion 3000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Deep Blue, Deep Green, Deep Gold | Gray |
| Price | About 80 EUR | About 190 EUR |
Wiko View4 Lite
- Potentially lower price point
- Functional for basic tasks
- MediaTek chipset is widely supported
- Inferior CPU architecture compared to Snapdragon
- Less efficient 12nm process
- Likely slower performance in demanding apps
Nokia C210
- More powerful Snapdragon 662 processor
- More efficient 11nm process
- Smoother multitasking and app loading
- May be slightly more expensive
- Qualcomm chipsets can sometimes have driver update delays
- Potentially larger file size for system updates
Display Comparison
Neither device is expected to boast a high-end display. Details are limited, but the focus here will be on performance impact. The more powerful processor in the Nokia C210 will likely handle UI rendering and video playback more smoothly, even if both phones feature similar resolutions. The 11nm Snapdragon 662’s efficiency could also contribute to slightly better battery life during video consumption.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the processing power of the Snapdragon 662 in the Nokia C210 will likely result in faster image processing and potentially better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 662 is more advanced, enabling features like better noise reduction and dynamic range. The Wiko View4 Lite will likely rely on more basic image processing algorithms.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Nokia C210’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11nm) features a Kryo 260 CPU with a split core configuration – 4x2.0 GHz Gold and 4x1.8 GHz Silver. This architecture prioritizes performance when needed while conserving power during less demanding tasks. Conversely, the Wiko View4 Lite’s MediaTek Helio A25 (12nm) utilizes an octa-core Cortex-A53 setup, with all cores clocked at either 1.8 GHz or 1.5 GHz. While both are octa-core, the Snapdragon 662’s Kryo cores are architecturally superior, offering better instructions per clock (IPC) and overall efficiency. This translates to a more responsive experience in everyday tasks and a noticeable advantage in gaming.
Battery Life
Battery capacity details are missing for both devices. However, the Snapdragon 662’s 11nm manufacturing process is more efficient than the Helio A25’s 12nm process. This means the Nokia C210 is likely to achieve comparable or better battery life, even with a similar capacity battery, due to reduced power consumption. The Snapdragon’s efficiency also means less heat generation, potentially leading to more sustained performance during extended use.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko View4 Lite if your primary needs are basic communication – calls, texts, and light social media – and you prioritize absolute affordability. It’s a functional device for those on the tightest of budgets. Buy the Nokia C210 if you value a more fluid user experience, occasionally play mobile games, or anticipate using multiple apps simultaneously. The Snapdragon 662 offers a significant performance advantage for a relatively small increase in cost.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Nokia C210 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
While the Snapdragon 662 isn't a gaming powerhouse, it's capable of running PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile at lower settings. Expect playable frame rates with reduced graphics quality. The Helio A25 in the Wiko View4 Lite will struggle with these titles, likely resulting in a choppy and frustrating experience.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the Helio A25 and Snapdragon 662 noticeable in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Yes, the difference is noticeable. The Snapdragon 662’s more efficient architecture and higher clock speeds result in snappier app launches, smoother scrolling, and faster web page loading. The Wiko View4 Lite will feel more sluggish, especially when multitasking.
❓ Which phone is likely to receive more software updates?
Nokia generally has a better track record for providing software updates, even for its budget devices. While neither phone is guaranteed long-term support, the Nokia C210 is more likely to receive security patches and potentially even Android version upgrades.
