The Wiko View4 Lite and Infinix Smart 4c represent the ultra-budget end of the smartphone spectrum, targeting first-time smartphone buyers or those needing a reliable secondary device. Both phones aim to deliver essential functionality at the lowest possible price point, but significant differences in their core processing power dictate which device offers a smoother, more capable experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Wiko View4 Lite is the better choice. Its Mediatek Helio A25 chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the quad-core Helio A22 in the Infinix Smart 4c, resulting in snappier app loading and multitasking. While both phones are limited, the Wiko offers a more future-proof experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020. Released 2020 | 2019, November. Released 2019, December |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 167 x 76.8 x 8.5 mm (6.57 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 167 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.57 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 174 g (6.14 oz) | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~80.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 450 nits (peak) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762D Helio A25 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 9.0 (Pie) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 8 MP
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | Dual-LED flash |
| Triple | 13 MP
5 MP
2 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Deep Blue, Deep Green, Deep Gold | Midnight Black, Quetzal Cyan, Cosmic Purple |
| Models | - | X653C |
| Price | About 80 EUR | - |
Wiko View4 Lite
- Octa-core processor offers better multitasking.
- More responsive user experience.
- Potentially better long-term software support.
- Likely similar display quality to the Infinix Smart 4c.
- Camera performance will be limited.
Infinix Smart 4c
- Lowest possible price point.
- Simple and easy-to-use interface.
- Acceptable for basic communication tasks.
- Quad-core processor struggles with multitasking.
- Slower app loading times.
- Limited performance for modern apps.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both are likely utilizing LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. Specifics like resolution and brightness are not provided, but we can assume they are adequate for basic viewing. The focus here isn't on visual fidelity, but on functionality. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both, maximizing screen real estate within a compact form factor. Color accuracy is unlikely to be a strong point on either device.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance on both devices will be limited. Without specific sensor details, it’s safe to assume both feature basic sensors. The marketing materials for these phones often highlight megapixel counts, but sensor size and image processing are far more important. Expect acceptable results in well-lit conditions, but poor performance in low light. Any additional cameras (often 2MP macro or depth sensors) are likely to offer minimal benefit. The Wiko View4 Lite *may* have a slight edge if it utilizes a marginally larger primary sensor, but this is speculative without further information.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipset. The Wiko View4 Lite’s Mediatek Helio A25 (12nm) features an octa-core CPU comprised of four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and four at 1.5 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Infinix Smart 4c’s Mediatek Helio A22 (12nm) which utilizes a quad-core CPU with Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. While the A22 has a higher clock speed *per core*, the A25’s eight cores provide superior multitasking capabilities. The A25 will handle app switching and running multiple applications concurrently far more effectively. The A25’s architecture is better suited for modern Android workloads, even if both are entry-level. The impact is felt in everyday tasks like opening apps, scrolling through web pages, and navigating the user interface.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, given their target market and hardware, both likely house batteries in the 3000-4000 mAh range. The real-world battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns. The more efficient Helio A25 in the Wiko View4 Lite *could* translate to slightly longer battery life under similar workloads, but the difference is unlikely to be substantial. Charging wattage is also unknown, suggesting slow charging speeds for both devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko View4 Lite if you prioritize responsiveness and the ability to handle multiple apps without significant slowdown. It's ideal for users who occasionally browse social media, use messaging apps, and take basic photos. Buy the Infinix Smart 4c if your needs are extremely basic – primarily making calls, sending texts, and light web browsing – and you're looking for the absolute lowest price point. The Smart 4c is best suited for those who prioritize cost above all else.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Wiko View4 Lite handle popular social media apps like Facebook and WhatsApp smoothly?
Yes, the Wiko View4 Lite’s octa-core processor should provide a reasonably smooth experience with Facebook and WhatsApp. While it won’t be as fluid as a higher-end device, it’s capable of handling these apps without significant lag. The Infinix Smart 4c may struggle with these apps, especially when multitasking.
❓ Is the Infinix Smart 4c suitable for someone who has never used a smartphone before?
The Infinix Smart 4c is a viable option for a first-time smartphone user, particularly if their needs are limited to calls, texts, and basic internet browsing. Its simplicity and low price point make it an accessible entry point into the world of smartphones. However, be aware that its performance will be limited.
❓ Can either of these phones play modern mobile games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
Neither phone is well-suited for playing demanding games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile. The Helio A25 and A22 chipsets lack the graphical power to run these games at playable frame rates, even on the lowest settings. Expect significant lag and stuttering.
❓ What about software updates? Will either phone receive Android version upgrades?
Software update support is limited for both devices. Given their price point and target market, it’s unlikely either the Wiko View4 Lite or the Infinix Smart 4c will receive major Android version upgrades. Expect security patches to be infrequent, if at all.
