Both the Wiko View3 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 7S target the budget-conscious smartphone user, but they approach this segment with vastly different hardware. The Wiko View3 relies on Mediatek’s Helio P22, while the Redmi Note 7S leverages Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 660. This comparison dissects these key differences to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7S is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 660 chipset provides a noticeable speed advantage, coupled with faster 18W Quick Charge 4 support. While the Wiko View3 offers a functional experience, it struggles to keep pace in demanding tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat12 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, February. Released 2019, May | 2019, May. Released 2019, May |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159 x 76.5 x 8.2 mm (6.26 x 3.01 x 0.32 in) | 159.2 x 75.2 x 8.1 mm (6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 178 g (6.28 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| | - | Splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.26 inches, 97.8 cm2 (~80.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762WB Helio P22 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie), planned upgrade to Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 12 MP, 27mm (wide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, PDAF
13 MP, 120˚, 16mm (ulrawide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60/120fps, (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Night Blue (Anthracite Blue), Blush Gold, Electro Bleen | Onyx Black, Sapphire Blue, Ruby Red, Astro White |
| Models | W-P311-EEA | M1901F71 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 140 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.25 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) | - |
Wiko View3
- Potentially lower price point
- Functional for basic tasks
- Mediatek Helio P22 is power efficient
- Significantly slower performance
- Likely inferior camera quality
- Missing charging speed details
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7S
- Faster Snapdragon 660 processor
- 18W Quick Charge 4.0 support
- 48MP main camera for detailed photos
- May be slightly more expensive
- 14nm process is less efficient than newer nodes
- IPS LCD display isn't cutting edge
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly standout display. Details regarding panel type (IPS vs. AMOLED) and resolution are missing for the Wiko View3, suggesting a standard LCD panel. The Redmi Note 7S, similarly, is expected to have an IPS LCD. The key difference lies in processing power; the Snapdragon 660’s more powerful GPU can contribute to smoother animations and potentially better image processing for display output. Without specific brightness or color accuracy data, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner, but the Redmi Note 7S’s superior chipset suggests a better overall visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications beyond the main sensors are unavailable for the Wiko View3, making a detailed comparison challenging. The Redmi Note 7S is known for its 48MP main sensor, which, while not necessarily indicative of superior image quality, allows for detailed photos and pixel binning for improved low-light performance. The Snapdragon 660’s image signal processor (ISP) also contributes to better image processing capabilities compared to the Helio P22’s ISP. Without knowing the aperture and sensor size of the Wiko View3’s camera, it’s reasonable to assume the Redmi Note 7S will deliver more consistently detailed and vibrant photos.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7S’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm) features a Kryo CPU architecture with a peak clock speed of 2.2 GHz, significantly outpacing the Wiko View3’s Mediatek Helio P22 (12nm) and its 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The Snapdragon 660’s architecture, with its mix of performance and efficiency cores, allows for better sustained performance under load. The 14nm process, while older, doesn’t negate the architectural advantage. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the Redmi Note 7S. The Helio P22, while efficient, is simply outmatched in raw processing power.
Battery Life
Battery capacity details for the Wiko View3 are missing. The Redmi Note 7S packs a 4000mAh battery and supports 18W Quick Charge 4.0. The faster charging is a significant advantage, allowing for a substantial top-up in a short amount of time. While a larger battery capacity is always beneficial, the Snapdragon 660’s improved efficiency can partially offset a smaller battery size. The Redmi Note 7S’s 18W charging capability provides a tangible benefit in daily use, reducing downtime and ensuring the phone is ready when you are.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko View3 if you need a basic smartphone for essential tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media use, and prioritize a lower initial cost. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7S if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for gaming, multitasking, and photography, and value faster charging and a more capable processor.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Redmi Note 7S handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 660 in the Redmi Note 7S is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with a stable frame rate. While it won't deliver the highest graphical fidelity, it provides a playable and enjoyable experience, unlike the Helio P22-powered Wiko View3 which would likely struggle with consistent performance.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the Redmi Note 7S compared to a standard 5W charger?
The Redmi Note 7S’s 18W Quick Charge 4.0 support can significantly reduce charging times. While a precise 0-100% time for the Wiko View3 is unknown, it would likely take over 3 hours with a standard charger. The Redmi Note 7S, with its 18W charger, can achieve a full charge in approximately 1 hour and 45 minutes, offering a substantial time saving.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 660 still a relevant chipset in 2024?
While not the latest and greatest, the Snapdragon 660 remains a capable chipset for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. It offers a significant performance advantage over the Helio P22 and provides a smooth user experience for most common smartphone activities. It's a solid choice for budget-conscious users who prioritize performance over bleeding-edge specs.
