The Wiko View3 and Nokia 5.1 Plus (also known as the Nokia X5 in China) represent compelling options in the ultra-budget smartphone space. Both devices aim to deliver a functional smartphone experience without breaking the bank, but they achieve this with different approaches to processing power. This comparison dissects the key differences between the Mediatek Helio P60 powering the Nokia and the Helio P22 in the Wiko, revealing which phone offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Nokia 5.1 Plus (X5) is the superior choice. Its Helio P60 chipset, featuring Cortex-A73 cores, provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Wiko View3’s Helio P22, translating to smoother multitasking and a more responsive user experience. While the Wiko View3 is more affordable, the performance gap justifies the price difference for all but the most basic users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 28, 38, 40, 66 - USA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, February. Released 2019, May | 2018, July 18. Released 2018, December 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159 x 76.5 x 8.2 mm (6.26 x 3.01 x 0.32 in) | 149.5 x 72 x 8.1 mm (5.89 x 2.83 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 178 g (6.28 oz) | 160 g (5.64 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~287 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.26 inches, 97.8 cm2 (~80.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.86 inches, 85.7 cm2 (~79.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) - GlobalOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) - China |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762WB Helio P22 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 8.1 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10, Android One |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 12 MP, 27mm (wide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, PDAF
13 MP, 120˚, 16mm (ulrawide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3060 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Night Blue (Anthracite Blue), Blush Gold, Electro Bleen | Night black, Glacier white, Baltic sea blue |
| Models | W-P311-EEA | TA-1120, TA-1105, TA-1102 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 190 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.10 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | 0.25 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) | 0.78 W/kg (head) 1.89 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 119428 (v7)
GFXBench: 7.4fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Wiko View3
- Lower price point makes it highly accessible.
- Sufficient for basic smartphone tasks.
- Helio P22 is relatively power efficient for simple use cases.
- Noticeably slower performance compared to the Nokia 5.1 Plus.
- Less capable ISP results in lower image quality.
- May struggle with multitasking and demanding apps.
Nokia 5.1 Plus (Nokia X5)
- Significantly faster performance thanks to the Helio P60.
- More capable ISP for better image quality.
- Smoother multitasking and improved gaming experience.
- Higher price compared to the Wiko View3.
- May not offer a dramatically different display experience.
- Battery life advantage is dependent on capacity and usage.
Display Comparison
Neither Wiko nor Nokia provide detailed display specifications in the provided data. However, given their market positioning, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The key difference lies under the hood. The Nokia 5.1 Plus, benefiting from the more powerful chipset, *may* have a slightly higher refresh rate or better color calibration, though this is speculative. The real-world impact will be minimal without detailed specs. Bezels are likely comparable, reflecting the budget nature of both devices.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is difficult. However, the Helio P60 in the Nokia 5.1 Plus includes a more capable image signal processor (ISP) than the Helio P22. This translates to better image processing, improved dynamic range, and potentially superior low-light performance. The Nokia 5.1 Plus is more likely to offer features like HDR processing and scene detection, enhancing image quality. The presence of a more powerful ISP is more impactful than sensor megapixel counts, which are often inflated in budget devices.
Performance
The core difference between these phones is the chipset. The Nokia 5.1 Plus boasts the Mediatek Helio P60, featuring a heterogeneous core configuration of 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This architecture provides a significant performance advantage over the Wiko View3’s Helio P22, which utilizes 8x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The Cortex-A73 cores in the P60 are substantially more powerful than the A53 cores found in both devices, resulting in faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The P60’s more efficient architecture also contributes to better thermal management. While both chipsets are built on a 12nm process, the architectural differences are paramount.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified, making a direct comparison challenging. However, the Helio P60’s more efficient architecture in the Nokia 5.1 Plus likely results in better battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity to the Wiko View3. The P60’s ability to handle tasks more efficiently reduces power consumption. Charging wattage is also unknown, but the Nokia 5.1 Plus’s more advanced chipset *could* support faster charging protocols, though this is speculative.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko View3 if you prioritize absolute affordability and only need a phone for essential tasks like calls, texts, and light social media browsing. Its Helio P22 is sufficient for these workloads. Buy the Nokia 5.1 Plus (Nokia X5) if you value a smoother, more responsive experience, enjoy occasional gaming, or plan to use more demanding apps. The Helio P60 offers a significant performance advantage that will extend the phone’s usability over time.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Nokia 5.1 Plus handle popular games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Nokia 5.1 Plus, with its Helio P60 and Cortex-A73 cores, is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with acceptable frame rates. While it won't deliver a flagship-level gaming experience, it provides a significantly smoother experience than the Wiko View3, which would likely struggle with consistent performance.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the Helio P60 and P22 noticeable in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Yes, the difference is quite noticeable. The Helio P60’s more powerful cores result in faster app loading times, smoother scrolling, and a more responsive user interface. While the Wiko View3 can handle basic tasks, the Nokia 5.1 Plus offers a more fluid and enjoyable experience, especially when switching between apps.
❓ Does the Nokia 5.1 Plus support software updates for longer than the Wiko View3?
Historically, Nokia has been committed to providing timely software updates and security patches for its smartphones, even in the budget segment. Wiko's update track record is less consistent. Therefore, the Nokia 5.1 Plus is likely to receive updates for a longer period, enhancing its longevity and security.
