The Wiko View3 represents an older generation of budget smartphones, while the Motorola Moto G75 aims to deliver a modern experience at an accessible price point. This comparison dissects the core differences between these two devices, focusing on how their contrasting chipsets and features impact real-world usability.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the vast majority of users, the Motorola Moto G75 is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset offers a substantial performance leap over the Wiko View3’s Helio P22, coupled with significantly improved battery endurance and faster charging. The View3 remains an option for extremely basic use cases.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, February. Released 2019, May | 2024, October 01 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2024, October 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), silicone polymer (eco leather) back or plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159 x 76.5 x 8.2 mm (6.26 x 3.01 x 0.32 in) | 166.1 x 77.2 x 8.3 mm (6.54 x 3.04 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 178 g (6.28 oz) | 205 g or 208 g (7.23 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 4 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.26 inches, 97.8 cm2 (~80.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762WB Helio P22 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 14, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 12 MP, 27mm (wide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, PDAF
13 MP, 120˚, 16mm (ulrawide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 30W wired, 50% in 25 min
15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Night Blue (Anthracite Blue), Blush Gold, Electro Bleen | Charcoal Gray, Aqua Blue, Succulent Green |
| Models | W-P311-EEA | XT2437-2, XT2437-3 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | $ 215.99 / C$ 277.67 / £ 189.99 / € 189.00 |
| SAR EU | 0.25 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | - | 48:58h endurance, 1000 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class B |
| Free fall | - | Class B (180 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class B |
Wiko View3
- Potentially lower price point
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- Compact form factor (likely)
- Outdated processor
- Poor performance for demanding tasks
- Limited battery life
- Slow charging speeds
Motorola Moto G75
- Significantly faster processor
- Excellent battery life and endurance
- Fast wired and wireless charging
- More modern features and software support
- Potentially higher price
- May be larger and heavier than the View3
- Software bloatware (typical of Motorola)
Display Comparison
Context data lacks display specifics for both devices. However, given the Moto G75’s positioning, it likely features an IPS LCD panel with a standard refresh rate. The Wiko View3, being an older model, likely has a lower resolution and brightness. The G75’s more recent manufacturing likely benefits from improved color calibration and viewing angles. Without specific nit ratings, it’s safe to assume the G75 offers a more vibrant and usable display in outdoor conditions.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Moto G75, being a more recent device, likely benefits from improved image processing algorithms and potentially a larger sensor. The Helio P22’s ISP is older and less capable than the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3’s, resulting in lower image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. While both phones may include multiple rear cameras, the G75’s primary sensor is likely to deliver sharper, more detailed photos with better dynamic range. The View3’s camera system is likely focused on basic functionality, while the G75 aims for a more versatile experience.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The Motorola Moto G75’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4nm) is built on a far more efficient process node than the Wiko View3’s MediaTek Helio P22 (12nm). The Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 utilizes a combination of Cortex-A78 and A55 cores, offering significantly higher single-core and multi-core performance compared to the View3’s all-Cortex-A53 configuration. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user interface on the G75. The 4nm process also contributes to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads. Gamers and power users will find the Moto G75 a far more capable device.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G75 boasts a significant advantage in battery endurance, rated at 48:58 hours. This is likely due to the efficiency of the 4nm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset. While the View3’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the older, less efficient Helio P22 would require a larger battery to achieve comparable results. Furthermore, the G75 supports 30W wired charging, allowing for a 50% charge in just 25 minutes, and 15W wireless charging, offering convenient charging options. The View3 likely supports slower charging speeds, requiring significantly more time to reach a full charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko View3 if you need a very basic smartphone for essential tasks like calls, texts, and light social media, and are prioritizing the absolute lowest possible price. Buy the Motorola Moto G75 if you prioritize a smooth user experience, enjoy mobile gaming, require reliable battery life, and appreciate the convenience of fast wired and wireless charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Motorola Moto G75 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset in the Moto G75 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. The combination of Cortex-A78 cores and the Adreno GPU provides sufficient processing power for a smooth gaming experience, unlike the Helio P22 which would struggle with such titles.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the Moto G75 compared to the Wiko View3?
The Moto G75’s 30W wired charging can reach 50% battery in 25 minutes, a speed the Wiko View3 likely cannot match. Given the View3’s age and likely use of older charging technology, a full charge could take several hours, while the G75 offers a significantly quicker top-up.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset in the Moto G75 a significant upgrade over the Helio P22 in the Wiko View3?
Absolutely. The Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 is built on a 4nm process, offering vastly improved power efficiency and performance compared to the 12nm Helio P22. The architectural differences in the CPU cores (A78 vs A53) and GPU capabilities result in a much smoother and more responsive user experience on the Moto G75.
