The Huawei P smart 2019 and Wiko View3 represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, but they diverge significantly in their internal hardware. This comparison dissects those differences, focusing on performance, battery endurance, and overall user experience to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and future-proofing, the Huawei P smart 2019 is the better choice. Its Kirin 710 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Wiko View3’s Helio P22, making it more suitable for multitasking and demanding applications. Both phones share identical battery endurance, but the P smart’s processing power gives it an edge.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, February. Released 2019, May | 2018, December 28. Released 2019, January 11 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159 x 76.5 x 8.2 mm (6.26 x 3.01 x 0.32 in) | 155.2 x 73.4 x 8 mm (6.11 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 178 g (6.28 oz) | 160 g (5.64 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~415 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.26 inches, 97.8 cm2 (~80.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.21 inches, 94.7 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762WB Helio P22 (12 nm) | Kirin 710 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G51 MP4 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie), EMUI 9.1, Google Play Services |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/1.8, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 12 MP, 27mm (wide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, PDAF
13 MP, 120˚, 16mm (ulrawide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 16 MP
or
8 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (POT-LX1) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3400 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Night Blue (Anthracite Blue), Blush Gold, Electro Bleen | Midnight Black, Aurora Blue, Sapphire Blue, Coral Red |
| Models | W-P311-EEA | POT-LX1, POT-LX1AF, POT-LX2J, POT-LX1RUA, POT-LX3, POT-LX1A |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.25 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) | 0.83 W/kg (head) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.1dB / Crosstalk -81.9dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 88h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1345:1 (nominal), 3.069 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 69dB / Noise 73dB / Ring 86dB |
Wiko View3
- Lower price point (likely)
- Acceptable battery life (88h endurance)
- Functional for basic tasks
- Inferior processor (Helio P22)
- Limited multitasking capabilities
- Potentially slower software updates
Huawei P smart 2019
- More powerful processor (Kirin 710)
- Smoother user experience
- Better long-term performance
- Acceptable battery life (88h endurance)
- Slightly higher price (likely)
- Slow 10W charging
Display Comparison
Both the Wiko View3 and Huawei P smart 2019 share the same display characteristics, boasting a contrast ratio of 1345:1 (nominal) and 3.069 (sunlight). This suggests a similar viewing experience in both indoor and outdoor conditions. However, without knowing the panel type (IPS, TFT) or resolution, it’s difficult to assess color accuracy or sharpness. The shared contrast ratio indicates a comparable level of black depth and overall image vibrancy, but neither is likely to compete with higher-end displays.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or features like Optical Image Stabilization (OIS). Given the budget nature of these phones, it’s reasonable to assume they employ relatively basic camera setups. Without further information, it’s difficult to definitively assess camera quality. However, Huawei’s image processing algorithms are generally more sophisticated than Wiko’s, potentially leading to better dynamic range and image clarity in the P smart 2019. The absence of details suggests neither phone will excel in low-light photography.
Performance
The core difference between these two devices lies in their chipsets. The Huawei P smart 2019 utilizes the Kirin 710, an octa-core processor with a heterogeneous architecture – 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores for performance and 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores for efficiency. This contrasts with the Wiko View3’s Mediatek MT6762WB Helio P22, which features eight 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The A73 cores in the Kirin 710 offer significantly higher single-core performance, translating to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. While both are 12nm chips, the Kirin 710’s architecture provides a clear advantage in processing power, making it better suited for more demanding tasks.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both the Wiko View3 and Huawei P smart 2019 achieve an endurance rating of 88 hours. This suggests comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the P smart 2019’s more efficient chipset and potentially optimized power management could translate to slightly longer real-world usage. Both phones support 10W wired charging, which is relatively slow by today’s standards. Expect approximately 2.5-3 hours for a full charge from 0%.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko View3 if you need a basic, functional smartphone for essential tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media use, and are on a very tight budget. Buy the Huawei P smart 2019 if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience, enjoy occasional gaming, and want a device that will feel more capable over time. The P smart’s chipset offers a longer usability lifespan.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Huawei P smart 2019 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty?
The Kirin 710 is capable of running PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a smooth frame rate. Don't expect the same performance as flagship devices, but it's playable. The Wiko View3's Helio P22 will struggle with these titles, even on the lowest settings.
❓ How does the software experience differ between the Wiko View3 and Huawei P smart 2019?
The Huawei P smart 2019 typically runs EMUI, Huawei’s custom Android skin, which offers a range of features and customizations. The Wiko View3 likely runs a near-stock Android experience, which is generally cleaner and less resource-intensive. However, EMUI often receives more frequent software updates and security patches.
❓ Is the 10W charging speed on either phone a significant drawback?
Yes, 10W charging is relatively slow compared to modern smartphones that support 18W, 30W, or even faster charging speeds. Expect a full charge to take around 2.5 to 3 hours. This isn't a deal-breaker, but it's something to consider if you frequently find yourself needing to quickly top up your battery.
