The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Wiko View3 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro represent compelling options, but cater to slightly different priorities. The View3 Pro aims for a balanced experience, while the Redmi Note 7 Pro leans heavily into performance with its Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 675, built on an 11nm process, delivers a noticeable advantage in both CPU and GPU tasks, alongside the benefit of Quick Charge 4 support. While the Wiko View3 Pro offers a respectable experience, it falls behind in processing power.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat9 450/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, February. Released 2019, May | 2019, February 28. Released 2019, March 18 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 75 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) | 159.2 x 75.2 x 8.1 mm (6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 612 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 12 MP, 27mm (wide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, PDAF
13 MP, 16mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm, PDAF | 13 MP, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Nightfall (Anthracite Blue/Gold), Ocean (Deep Bleen) | Nebula Red, Neptune Blue, Space Black, Astro White |
| Models | - | M1901F7S |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.96 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.61 W/kg (head) 1.50 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 180754 (v7), 215308 (v8)
GeekBench: 6620 (v4.4), 1624 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 7.9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Wiko View3 Pro
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable for basic tasks
- Decent performance for everyday use
- Inferior chipset compared to Snapdragon 675
- Slower charging speeds
- Less future-proof
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro
- Superior Snapdragon 675 performance
- Faster 18W Quick Charge 4 support
- More efficient power consumption
- Better gaming experience
- May be slightly more expensive
- No standout display features
- Camera performance relies on software optimization
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, common in this price bracket. However, the lack of detailed display specs (resolution, brightness) necessitates a focus on processing power impacting UI smoothness. The Redmi Note 7 Pro’s superior chipset will translate to a more responsive user interface, even if the panels themselves are similar. Bezels are likely comparable, given the market segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is difficult. However, the Redmi Note 7 Pro’s brand reputation suggests a more refined image processing pipeline. The focus should be on real-world image quality, but the Snapdragon 675’s image signal processor (ISP) is generally more capable than the Helio P60’s. The absence of OIS on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization. The Wiko View3 Pro may include a variety of secondary lenses, but their utility is questionable without knowing their sensor sizes and apertures. The Redmi Note 7 Pro likely prioritizes a strong main sensor over quantity.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (11nm) is a significant upgrade over the Wiko View3 Pro’s MediaTek Helio P60 (12nm). The 11nm process node of the Snapdragon 675 offers improved power efficiency and thermal management, meaning sustained performance is higher. While both are octa-core CPUs, the Snapdragon 675 utilizes Kryo cores – specifically, 2x Kryo 460 Gold (2.0 GHz) and 6x Kryo 460 Silver (1.7 GHz) – designed for a more balanced performance profile. The Helio P60’s Cortex-A73 and A53 configuration, while capable, is less efficient. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience on the Redmi Note 7 Pro.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device, making a direct mAh comparison impossible. However, the Redmi Note 7 Pro’s 18W Quick Charge 4 support is a major advantage. This significantly reduces charging times compared to the Wiko View3 Pro, which likely relies on standard charging speeds. The Snapdragon 675’s improved power efficiency also contributes to potentially longer battery life, even with a similar capacity battery. The 18W charging will be particularly beneficial for users who frequently top up their phones throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko View3 Pro if you need a reliable daily driver for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and light photography, and prioritize a potentially lower price point. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro if you prefer a smoother experience with more demanding apps, enjoy mobile gaming, and value faster charging capabilities. The Redmi Note 7 Pro is the better choice for users who anticipate keeping their phone for multiple years.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio P60 in the Wiko View3 Pro struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
Yes, the Helio P60 will likely struggle to maintain consistent frame rates in PUBG Mobile at higher settings. While playable, you'll likely need to reduce graphics settings significantly for a smoother experience. The Snapdragon 675 in the Redmi Note 7 Pro offers a much more comfortable gaming experience.
❓ Does the Redmi Note 7 Pro support fast charging with any charger, or do I need a Quick Charge 4 compatible adapter?
While the Redmi Note 7 Pro will charge with any USB charger, you'll only achieve the full 18W charging speed with a Quick Charge 4 compatible adapter. Using a standard charger will result in significantly slower charging times.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance between the Helio P60 and Snapdragon 675 noticeable in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
The difference is subtle but present. The Snapdragon 675 provides a smoother and more responsive experience, especially when multitasking or switching between apps. The Helio P60 is adequate for basic tasks, but the Redmi Note 7 Pro feels more refined.
