The Samsung Galaxy A50s and Wiko View3 Pro represent different approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The A50s, backed by Samsung’s brand recognition, aims for a balanced experience, while the Wiko View3 Pro attempts to undercut the competition on price. This comparison dives deep into their core components to determine which device delivers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A50s is the superior choice. Its Exynos 9611 chipset, built on a more efficient 10nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Wiko View3 Pro’s Helio P60. While the Wiko offers a potentially lower price, the A50s’ improved processing power and 15W charging justify the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, February. Released 2019, May | 2019, August 22. Released 2019, September |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 75 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) | 158.5 x 74.5 x 7.7 mm (6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 169 g (5.96 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60 (12 nm) | Exynos 9611 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, One UI 3.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 12 MP, 27mm (wide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, PDAF
13 MP, 16mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm, PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | ANT+ |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Nightfall (Anthracite Blue/Gold), Ocean (Deep Bleen) | Prism Crush Black, Prism Crush White, Prism Crush Green, Prism Crush Violet2 |
| Models | - | SM-A507F, SM-A507FN, SM-A5070 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 290 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.61 W/kg (head) 1.50 W/kg (body) | 0.43 W/kg (head) 1.55 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 154761 (v7)
GeekBench: 5295 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 9.2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Wiko View3 Pro
- Faster and more efficient Exynos 9611 chipset
- 15W fast charging for quicker top-ups
- Likely superior camera image processing
- Potentially higher price point
- Samsung’s software can include bloatware
Samsung Galaxy A50s
- Potentially lower price
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Helio P60 is still capable for everyday use
- Slower Helio P60 processor
- Likely slower charging speeds
- Potentially lower camera quality
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the A50s’ positioning, it likely features a higher-quality panel with better color accuracy and potentially higher peak brightness. The Wiko View3 Pro, aiming for cost savings, may utilize a less sophisticated display technology. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of this price segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, Samsung generally excels in image processing, and the A50s likely benefits from more sophisticated algorithms. The Wiko View3 Pro’s camera system is likely more basic, focusing on affordability over image quality. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the Wiko is unlikely to provide significant benefit, as these sensors often lack detail and dynamic range. The A50s likely offers better low-light performance and more consistent results across various shooting conditions.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A50s’ Exynos 9611 chipset, fabricated on a 10nm process, is the clear winner in terms of performance and efficiency. Its octa-core CPU, with 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 cores, significantly outpaces the Wiko View3 Pro’s Helio P60 (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73). The 10nm process allows the Exynos to maintain higher sustained performance with less thermal throttling, benefiting users who engage in demanding tasks like gaming or video editing. While both utilize a similar core configuration, the clock speed and manufacturing process give the A50s a substantial edge.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn’t specified for either device. However, the Samsung Galaxy A50s includes 15W wired charging, a significant advantage over the Wiko View3 Pro, which likely offers slower charging speeds. Faster charging translates to less downtime and a more convenient user experience. Even if the Wiko View3 Pro has a slightly larger battery capacity, the A50s’ faster charging will likely result in less perceived battery anxiety.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko View3 Pro if your primary need is a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media, and you are extremely budget-constrained. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A50s if you prioritize smoother multitasking, occasional gaming, and a more refined user experience, and are willing to spend a bit more for improved performance and faster charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 9611 in the Samsung Galaxy A50s tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 9611, built on a 10nm process, is generally well-managed in terms of thermal performance. While some throttling may occur during extended, graphically intensive gaming, it’s unlikely to be severe enough to cause significant performance drops or discomfort. The 10nm process contributes to better efficiency compared to the Wiko View3 Pro’s Helio P60.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on the Wiko View3 Pro actually useful for taking detailed close-up photos?
Typically, 2MP macro cameras on budget smartphones like the Wiko View3 Pro offer limited benefit. The small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization result in images that often lack detail, suffer from poor dynamic range, and appear soft. While it can capture close-up shots, the quality is unlikely to be significantly better than using the main camera in standard mode.
❓ Can the Samsung Galaxy A50s handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile at high frame rates?
The Samsung Galaxy A50s should be capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings with reasonably stable frame rates. While it won’t achieve the maximum settings possible on flagship devices, the Exynos 9611 provides sufficient power for a playable experience. Expect frame rates around 30-40fps, depending on the specific settings and in-game activity.
