The Realme 3 Pro and Wiko View3 Pro represent compelling options in the crowded budget and mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid user experience, they take different approaches to achieving it. The Realme 3 Pro leverages Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 710, while the Wiko View3 Pro opts for MediaTek’s Helio P60. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and faster charging, the Realme 3 Pro is the clear winner thanks to its Snapdragon 710 chipset and 20W charging. However, the Wiko View3 Pro may offer a more affordable entry point for those less demanding on raw processing power, potentially making it a better value proposition.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - India |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/75 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - EMEA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, February. Released 2019, May | 2019, April 22. Released 2019, May |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 75 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) | 156.8 x 74.2 x 8.3 mm (6.17 x 2.92 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 172 g (6.07 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 616 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie), planned upgrade to Android 10, ColorOS 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/1.7, 1/2.6", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR |
| Triple | 12 MP, 27mm (wide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, PDAF
13 MP, 16mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm, PDAF | 25 MP, f/2.0, 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 20W wired, 50% in 30 min |
| Music play | - | Up to 126 h |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 383 h (3G) |
| Talk time | - | Up to 32 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | 4045 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Nightfall (Anthracite Blue/Gold), Ocean (Deep Bleen) | Carbon Gray, Nitro Blue, Lightning Purple |
| Models | - | RMX1851 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.61 W/kg (head) 1.50 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -92.9dB / Crosstalk -91.1dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 91h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1782:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 67dB / Noise 73dB / Ring 90dB
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 155647 (v7)
GeekBench: 5881 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 11fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Wiko View3 Pro
- Potentially lower price point
- Decent battery endurance (91h)
- Functional for everyday tasks
- Less powerful Helio P60 chipset
- Likely slower charging speeds
- Potentially lower camera performance
Realme 3 Pro
- More powerful Snapdragon 710 chipset
- Faster 20W charging (50% in 30 min)
- Potentially better camera ISP
- Generally higher price
- Battery endurance is similar to Wiko View3 Pro
- May not justify the price increase for basic users
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1782:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, the context data lacks specifics on panel type, resolution, or brightness. Given the market positioning, it’s likely both utilize IPS LCD panels. Without further data, it’s difficult to definitively say which offers a superior viewing experience, but the Realme 3 Pro’s slightly higher price point *could* indicate a higher quality panel.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or features like Optical Image Stabilization (OIS). In this segment, camera performance often correlates with chipset image signal processing (ISP) capabilities. The Snapdragon 710’s ISP is generally more advanced than the Helio P60’s, potentially resulting in better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. Without detailed camera specs, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the Realme 3 Pro likely holds an edge.
Performance
The Realme 3 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (10nm) represents a significant architectural advantage over the Wiko View3 Pro’s MediaTek Helio P60 (12nm). The Snapdragon 710 utilizes Kryo 360 cores – 2x 2.2 GHz Gold and 6x 1.7 GHz Silver – built on a more efficient 10nm process. This translates to better performance per watt and improved thermal management compared to the Helio P60’s Cortex-A73 and A53 configuration. The 10nm process allows the Snapdragon 710 to sustain higher clock speeds for longer periods, benefiting demanding applications and gaming. Users who frequently multitask or play graphically intensive games will experience a smoother experience on the Realme 3 Pro.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both devices share an endurance rating of 91 hours. This suggests similar real-world battery life despite the differing chipsets. However, the Realme 3 Pro boasts 20W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 30 minutes. The Wiko View3 Pro’s charging speed is not specified, implying it’s likely slower. This faster charging capability is a significant convenience factor for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko View3 Pro if you need a functional smartphone for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light media consumption, and are on a very tight budget. Buy the Realme 3 Pro if you prioritize smoother multitasking, occasional gaming, and faster charging speeds, and are willing to spend a bit more for a noticeable performance boost.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Helio P60 in the Wiko View3 Pro struggle with demanding games like PUBG?
The Helio P60 can run PUBG, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. The Snapdragon 710 in the Realme 3 Pro offers a more comfortable gaming experience with higher settings and more consistent performance.
❓ How much faster is the 20W charging on the Realme 3 Pro compared to a standard 10W charger?
The 20W charging on the Realme 3 Pro can significantly reduce charging times. While a standard 10W charger might take over 2 hours for a full charge, the 20W charger can reach 50% in just 30 minutes, making it ideal for quick top-ups.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
For basic tasks, the difference between the Helio P60 and Snapdragon 710 might not be immediately apparent. However, the Snapdragon 710 will provide smoother multitasking and faster app loading times, especially when switching between multiple applications.
