The Wiko View3 Pro and Nokia 7.2 represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. Both aim to deliver a balanced experience, but they take different approaches to achieving it. The Wiko leverages MediaTek’s Helio P60, while the Nokia opts for Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 660. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device offers the best overall package for the price-conscious consumer.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Nokia 7.2 emerges as the slightly better choice. While both phones offer similar battery endurance, the Snapdragon 660 provides a more refined and consistently smoother performance experience, coupled with a brighter, more visible display in outdoor conditions. The Wiko View3 Pro remains a viable option for those prioritizing a lower initial cost.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - ROW |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - ROW |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps or LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - IN |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, February. Released 2019, May | 2019, September 05. Released 2019, September 23 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 75 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) | 159.9 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, Android One |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 12 MP, 27mm (wide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, PDAF
13 MP, 16mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Zeiss optics, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm, PDAF | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (excl. India) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Nightfall (Anthracite Blue/Gold), Ocean (Deep Bleen) | Cyan Green, Charcoal, Ice |
| Models | - | TA-1193, TA-1178, TA-1196, TA-1181 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 240 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.15 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.61 W/kg (head) 1.50 W/kg (body) | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.44 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.0dB / Crosstalk -93.4dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 69h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1342:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.6 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 139495 (v7), 164484 (v8)
GeekBench: 5440 (v4.4), 1398 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Wiko View3 Pro
- Potentially lower price point
- Decent battery life (69h endurance)
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Helio P60 chipset offers less performance
- Display brightness likely inferior to Nokia 7.2
- Limited software support expected
Nokia 7.2
- Snapdragon 660 provides smoother performance
- Brighter display (585 nits) for better outdoor visibility
- Nokia’s reputation for software updates
- Slower 10W charging
- Potentially higher price than Wiko View3 Pro
- Battery life is comparable, not superior
Display Comparison
The Nokia 7.2 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 585 nits, compared to the Wiko View3 Pro’s unspecified brightness. This makes the Nokia far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. Both displays share a 1342:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar color depth and black levels, but the higher brightness of the Nokia is a key advantage. While neither phone is likely to feature high refresh rate panels, the Nokia’s superior brightness contributes to a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, Nokia historically focuses on computational photography, meaning the 7.2 likely benefits from more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The absence of details suggests neither phone will compete with flagship camera systems, but the Nokia’s brand reputation suggests a more refined camera experience. We can assume both will struggle in low-light conditions without optical image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
The Nokia 7.2’s Snapdragon 660, built on a 14nm process, generally outperforms the Wiko View3 Pro’s Helio P60 (12nm). While both are octa-core CPUs, the Snapdragon 660’s Kryo 260 cores (2.2 GHz Gold & 1.8 GHz Silver) offer a more efficient architecture and higher clock speeds than the Helio P60’s Cortex-A73 (2.0 GHz) and Cortex-A53 (2.0 GHz) configuration. This translates to snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and better sustained performance during gaming. The 14nm process, despite being older, doesn't necessarily equate to worse efficiency; Qualcomm's architecture is highly optimized. The Wiko View3 Pro may show more noticeable slowdowns under heavy load.
Battery Life
Both the Wiko View3 Pro and Nokia 7.2 achieve an endurance rating of 69 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the Nokia 7.2’s 10W charging is significantly slower than what’s becoming standard, meaning a full charge will take considerably longer. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the similar endurance ratings suggest comparable sizes. The Snapdragon 660’s efficiency may contribute to slightly better real-world battery performance, but the difference is likely minimal.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko View3 Pro if you need a functional smartphone with basic capabilities and are operating on a very tight budget. It’s a good choice for users who primarily use their phone for calls, texts, and light social media. Buy the Nokia 7.2 if you prioritize a more responsive user experience, a brighter and more pleasant display for media consumption, and a generally more polished software experience, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 660 in the Nokia 7.2 still capable of running modern apps smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 660 remains a capable chipset for everyday tasks and most popular apps. While it won't deliver flagship-level performance, it provides a noticeably smoother experience than the Helio P60, especially when multitasking or running demanding applications. Expect acceptable performance in most mobile games at medium settings.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Nokia 7.2 with its 10W charging?
With its 10W charging, the Nokia 7.2 will take approximately 3-4 hours to fully charge from 0% to 100%. This is significantly slower than phones with fast charging capabilities. Plan to charge it overnight to ensure it's ready for the next day.
❓ Does the Wiko View3 Pro support software updates, and for how long?
Wiko's software update track record is generally limited. Expect minimal updates beyond initial security patches, and the duration of support is likely to be shorter compared to Nokia's commitment to Android updates. This is a key consideration if long-term software support is important to you.
