The Wiko View3 Pro and Motorola Moto G7 Plus represent compelling options in the crowded mid-range smartphone market. Both devices aim to deliver a balanced experience, but they take different approaches to achieving it. The View3 Pro leverages MediaTek’s Helio P60, while the Moto G7 Plus opts for Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 636. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which phone offers the best overall package.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and faster charging, the Motorola Moto G7 Plus is the better choice. While the Wiko View3 Pro offers a comparable CPU core count, the Snapdragon 636’s more efficient 14nm process and optimized architecture translate to a smoother user experience and quicker power-ups thanks to its 27W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat12 600/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, February. Released 2019, May | 2019, February. Released 2019, March |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 75 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) | 157 x 75.3 x 8.3 mm (6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 176 g (6.21 oz) |
| | - | Splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2270 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.2 inches, 96.2 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM636 Snapdragon 636 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 509 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/1.7, 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 12 MP, 27mm (wide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, PDAF
13 MP, 16mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm, PDAF | 12 MP, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.25µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, EDR, aptX |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (Europe model) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 27W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Nightfall (Anthracite Blue/Gold), Ocean (Deep Bleen) | Deep Indigo, Viva Red |
| Models | - | XT1965 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 120 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.61 W/kg (head) 1.50 W/kg (body) | 0.78 W/kg (head) 1.73 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.3dB / Crosstalk -93.8dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 59h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1425 (nominal), 3.010 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 70dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 84dB |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 117829 (v7)
GeekBench: 4927 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 5.9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Wiko View3 Pro
- Potentially lower price point
- Comparable CPU core count to the Snapdragon 636
- Sufficient for basic smartphone tasks
- Less efficient chipset (12nm vs 14nm)
- Missing charging specifications
- Uncertain camera performance
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
- Faster and more efficient Snapdragon 636 chipset
- 27W fast charging with PD3.0 and QC4 support
- Likely better camera performance due to Qualcomm ISP
- May be slightly more expensive than the Wiko View3 Pro
- Similar battery endurance rating to the Wiko View3 Pro
- Display specs are not class-leading
Display Comparison
Both the Wiko View3 Pro and Motorola Moto G7 Plus share a similar contrast ratio of 1425:1 (nominal) and 3010:1 (sunlight), suggesting comparable visibility in bright conditions. However, detailed panel specifications like screen resolution and technology (IPS vs AMOLED) are missing for the Wiko View3 Pro. The Moto G7 Plus’s display benefits from Motorola’s color calibration, likely offering more accurate color reproduction. Without further data on the Wiko’s panel, the G7 Plus holds an edge in display quality based on brand reputation and available information.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, and image processing are absent. Without this information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, Motorola generally focuses on computational photography to enhance image quality, while Wiko often prioritizes affordability. It’s reasonable to assume the Moto G7 Plus offers a more refined camera experience, particularly in challenging lighting conditions, due to Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) capabilities. The absence of details on the Wiko’s camera suggests it may not be a primary selling point.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Wiko View3 Pro’s MediaTek Helio P60 (12nm) features an octa-core configuration with Cortex-A73 and A53 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. The Motorola Moto G7 Plus utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (14nm), also an octa-core processor, but with Kryo 260 Gold and Silver cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and 1.6 GHz respectively. While core counts are similar, the Snapdragon 636’s architecture and 14nm process generally provide better sustained performance and thermal efficiency. This means the Moto G7 Plus is less likely to throttle under prolonged load, making it a better choice for gaming or demanding applications. The larger process node of the Snapdragon 636, while seemingly less advanced, is optimized for efficiency in this generation.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 59 hours, indicating similar battery life under typical usage. However, the Moto G7 Plus significantly differentiates itself with 27W wired charging, supporting both PD3.0 and QC4 standards. This allows for much faster charging times compared to the Wiko View3 Pro, which lacks information on its charging capabilities. The G7 Plus can likely achieve a full charge in under 90 minutes, while the View3 Pro may take considerably longer, making the G7 Plus more convenient for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko View3 Pro if you need a phone primarily for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and are on a very tight budget. Its Helio P60 chipset is sufficient for these workloads. Buy the Motorola Moto G7 Plus if you prefer a more responsive experience for multitasking, occasional gaming, and appreciate the convenience of fast charging and a proven track record of software support.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 636 in the Moto G7 Plus struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
While not a flagship-level processor, the Snapdragon 636 is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. The 14nm process and optimized architecture help prevent significant throttling during extended gaming sessions, providing a more consistent experience than the Helio P60 might offer.
❓ How much faster is the 27W charging on the Moto G7 Plus compared to a standard 10W charger?
The 27W charging on the Moto G7 Plus can reduce charging times by over 50% compared to a standard 10W charger. Expect a full charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 90 minutes with the included charger, whereas a 10W charger could take upwards of 3 hours.
❓ Is the camera on the Wiko View3 Pro suitable for casual photography, or should I expect limited image quality?
Without detailed camera specifications, it's difficult to assess the Wiko View3 Pro's camera definitively. However, given Wiko's focus on affordability, it's likely the camera performs adequately in good lighting conditions but may struggle in low light. The Moto G7 Plus is expected to deliver superior image quality due to its Qualcomm ISP.
