Wiko View3 Pro vs Honor 8X Max: Which Budget Champion Reigns Supreme?

The Wiko View3 Pro and Honor 8X Max represent a shrinking breed: large-screen, budget-friendly smartphones. Both devices aimed to deliver a compelling experience without breaking the bank, but they took different approaches under the hood. This comparison dissects the key differences between the Mediatek Helio P60-powered Wiko and the Qualcomm Snapdragon 660-equipped Honor, focusing on real-world performance and user experience.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and faster charging, the Honor 8X Max emerges as the better choice. While the Wiko View3 Pro offers a comparable CPU core count, the Snapdragon 660’s more efficient 14nm process and optimized architecture translate to smoother multitasking and a more responsive user interface.

PHONES
Phone Names Wiko View3 Pro Honor 8X Max
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 401, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 - Global
SpeedHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/150 MbpsHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE
 -1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China
Launch
Announced2019, February. Released 2019, May2018, September. Released 2018, September
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
Dimensions159.5 x 75 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.95 x 0.32 in)177.6 x 86.3 x 8.1 mm (6.99 x 3.40 x 0.32 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight184 g (6.49 oz)210 g (7.41 oz)
Display
Resolution1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density)1080 x 2244 pixels, 18.7:9 ratio (~350 ppi density)
Size6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio)7.12 inches, 127.8 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (4x1.95 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver)
ChipsetMediatek MT6771 Helio P60 (12 nm)Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm)
GPUMali-G72 MP3Adreno 512
OSAndroid 9.0 (Pie)Android 8.1 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 9 (Pie), EMUI 9
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM
 eMMC 5.1eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
Dual-16 MP, f/2.0, PDAF Auxiliary lens
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, panorama, HDR
Triple12 MP, 27mm (wide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, PDAF 13 MP, 16mm (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens-
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR
Single16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm, PDAF8 MP, f/2.0
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth4.2, A2DP, LE4.2, A2DP, LE
NFCYesNo
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS, BDS
RadioFM radioFM radio
USBUSB Type-C 2.0microUSB 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging-18W wired 5W reverse wired
TypeLi-Po 4000 mAh, non-removableLi-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable
Misc
ColorsNightfall (Anthracite Blue/Gold), Ocean (Deep Bleen)Black, Blue, Red
Models-ARE-AL00, ARE-L22HN, ARE-AL10
PriceAbout 250 EURAbout 250 EUR
SAR EU0.61 W/kg (head)     1.50 W/kg (body)-

Wiko View3 Pro

  • Potentially lower initial purchase price.
  • Comparable CPU core count to the Snapdragon 660.
  • May offer a larger battery capacity (speculation).

  • Helio P60 chipset is less efficient than Snapdragon 660.
  • Slower charging speeds.
  • Inferior GPU performance for gaming.

Honor 8X Max

  • More efficient Snapdragon 660 chipset.
  • Faster 18W wired charging with 5W reverse charging.
  • Superior GPU performance for gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.

  • May be slightly more expensive than the Wiko View3 Pro.
  • Potentially smaller battery capacity (speculation).
  • Older 14nm process node (though refined).

Display Comparison

Neither Wiko nor Honor provided detailed display specs beyond screen size. However, given the market segment, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The key difference lies in the underlying chipsets’ ability to drive the displays efficiently. The Snapdragon 660’s Adreno 509 GPU is generally more capable in handling graphics rendering, potentially leading to smoother animations and a slightly more vibrant visual experience on the Honor 8X Max. Without specific brightness or color gamut data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the 660’s GPU gives it a slight edge.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera sensor information, a direct comparison is challenging. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup geared towards offering versatility at a low price point. However, Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 660 includes an Image Signal Processor (ISP) known for its superior image processing capabilities compared to Mediatek’s ISP in the Helio P60. This translates to better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Honor 8X Max is likely to produce more consistently pleasing photos, even if the megapixel count is similar.

Performance

The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Wiko View3 Pro’s Mediatek Helio P60 (12nm) features an octa-core CPU with Cortex-A73 and A53 cores, while the Honor 8X Max boasts the Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm). While both have eight cores, the Snapdragon 660 utilizes custom Kryo 260 cores designed for efficiency and performance. The 14nm process node of the Snapdragon 660, though older, is generally more refined than the 12nm of the Helio P60, leading to better thermal management and sustained performance. This means the Honor 8X Max is less likely to throttle under heavy load, making it the better choice for gamers or users who frequently multitask. The Snapdragon 660’s Adreno 509 GPU also significantly outperforms the Helio P60’s Mali-G72 MP3, further solidifying its performance advantage.

Battery Life

Battery capacity data is missing for both devices. However, the Honor 8X Max’s inclusion of 18W wired charging is a significant advantage. The Wiko View3 Pro likely relies on a slower charging standard. This means the Honor 8X Max can be topped up much faster, reducing downtime and providing greater convenience. Even if the Wiko View3 Pro has a slightly larger battery capacity, the faster charging of the Honor 8X Max will likely result in a more usable experience for power users.

Buying Guide

Buy the Wiko View3 Pro if you prioritize a potentially lower initial cost and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Buy the Honor 8X Max if you value a more fluid user experience, faster charging speeds, and a chipset known for better sustained performance during gaming and demanding applications. The 8X Max is the better option for users who want a phone that feels responsive even after prolonged use.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Honor 8X Max struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
While not a dedicated gaming phone, the Snapdragon 660 and Adreno 509 GPU in the Honor 8X Max are capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. The more efficient chipset also means less thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions compared to the Wiko View3 Pro.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the Helio P60 and Snapdragon 660 noticeable in everyday tasks?
Yes, the difference is noticeable. The Snapdragon 660 provides a smoother and more responsive experience when multitasking, opening apps, and navigating the user interface. The Helio P60 may exhibit occasional lag or stuttering, especially with multiple apps running simultaneously.
❓ Does the Honor 8X Max support fast charging with any specific charging brick?
The Honor 8X Max supports 18W fast charging, but it's crucial to use a compatible charger. While it may charge with a standard 5W charger, it will take significantly longer. Using a charger that supports Quick Charge 2.0 or higher is recommended to achieve the full 18W charging speed.