Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't compromise too much? The Wiko View2 Go and Wiko View are both contenders in the budget market. But which one offers the best value for your money? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Wiko View2 Go edges out the View thanks to its superior Octa-core processor and slightly improved performance. While both offer solid value, the View2 Go's extra processing power makes it the better choice for smoother multitasking and a more responsive experience, especially for the price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 20 | 1, 3, 7, 20 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2018, September. Released 2018, September | 2017, September. Released 2017, September |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 153.6 x 73.1 x 8.5 mm (6.05 x 2.88 x 0.33 in) | 151.5 x 73.1 x 8.7 mm (5.96 x 2.88 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 160 g (5.64 oz) | 160 g (5.64 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1512 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.93 inches, 88.1 cm2 (~78.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~75.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 | Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8937 Snapdragon 430 (28 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 505 | Adreno 308 |
| OS | Android 8.1 (Oreo) | Android 7.1 (Nougat) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 16GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 12 MP, 1/2.9", 1.25μm, PDAF | 13 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.0 | 16 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (optional) | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | Stereo FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 2900 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Anthracite, Gold, Cherry Red, Deep Bleen, Supernova | Black, Gold, Deep Bleen, Cherry Red |
| Models | View2 Go | View |
| Price | - | About 150 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.29 W/kg (head) 1.50 W/kg (body) | 0.40 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
Wiko View2 Go
- Faster Octa-core processor
- Improved multitasking
- Slightly more modern design
- Good value for money
- Camera performance not exceptional
- Plastic build quality
Wiko View
- Very affordable
- Simple and easy to use
- Decent battery life
- Slower Quad-core processor
- Less responsive
- Basic features
- Outdated design
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar display technology (IPS LCD) and resolution (likely HD+). The View2 Go *might* have a slightly brighter display, but this is difficult to confirm without specific testing data. Expect similar viewing angles and color accuracy for both.
Camera Comparison
Both phones likely feature a rear dual-camera setup (13MP + 2MP depth sensor) and a front-facing camera (8MP). Image quality will be comparable in good lighting conditions, but the View2 Go's slightly newer processor *could* offer marginally better image processing. Low-light performance will likely be similar on both.
Performance
This is where the View2 Go shines. Its Octa-core Snapdragon 430 processor offers a significant advantage over the View's Quad-core Snapdragon 425. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better overall responsiveness on the View2 Go. Gaming performance will also be improved.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have a battery capacity around 3000mAh. Battery life will be comparable, offering a full day of moderate usage. The View2 Go's more efficient processor *could* provide slightly better battery life, but this is not a significant difference.
Buying Guide
The Wiko View2 Go is ideal for users who prioritize performance and a slightly more modern experience on a tight budget. The Wiko View remains a good option for those seeking a very basic smartphone for calls, texts, and light usage, and who are extremely budget-conscious.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Wiko View2 Go worth the extra money compared to the Wiko View?
Yes, the View2 Go's improved performance makes it a worthwhile upgrade if you can afford it. The smoother experience is a significant benefit.
❓ What operating system do these phones use?
Both phones likely run Android 9 or 10, potentially with Wiko's custom UI on top. Updates may be limited.
