The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for your money. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Wiko View Max and the Motorola Moto G4. Both promise a lot, but which one truly delivers?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Motorola Moto G4 edges out the Wiko View Max thanks to its superior chipset, slightly better camera performance, and exceptional battery life. While the View Max might offer a more modern design, the G4's overall performance and longevity make it the stronger choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - XT1622 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 20 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 28, 40 - XT1622 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 - XT1624 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2018, March. Released 2018, March | 2016, May. Released 2016, May |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 157.8 x 75.8 x 7.9 mm (6.21 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 153 x 76.6 x 9.8 mm (6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Single SIM (Micro-SIM) or Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 158 g (5.57 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.99 inches, 92.6 cm2 (~77.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~71.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6739WA (28 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8952 Snapdragon 617 (28 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8100 | Adreno 405 |
| OS | Android 8.1 (Oreo) | Android 6.0.1 (Marshmallow), upgradable to 7.0 (Nougat) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM | 16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, PDAF | 13 MP, f/2.0, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.1, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, gyro |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Anthracite, Gold, Black | Black, White |
| Models | W_P200, W_P200CM | XT1625, XT1622, XT1624 |
| Price | - | About 130 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.23 W/kg (head) 1.10 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.32 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) | 0.59 W/kg (head) 1.83 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -92.4dB / Crosstalk -92.1dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 73h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1560 (nominal), 2.544 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 64dB / Noise 70dB / Ring 72dB
|
| Performance | - |
Basemark X: 6932 |
Wiko View Max
- Larger Display
- Modern Design
- Potentially more RAM (depending on variant)
- Weaker Processor
- Lower Camera Quality
- Less Efficient Battery
Motorola Moto G4
- Stronger Processor (Snapdragon 617)
- Better Camera Performance
- Excellent Battery Life
- 15W Charging
- Older Design
- Potentially smaller screen (depending on variant)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature similar contrast ratios (1560 nominal, 2.544 in sunlight), suggesting good outdoor visibility. However, the Moto G4 likely has slightly better color accuracy due to its more mature display technology. The View Max may have a slightly larger screen, but the G4's display is generally considered more refined.
Camera Comparison
While both offer 'Photo/Video' capabilities, the Moto G4 generally receives better reviews for its camera quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The G4's image processing is more refined, resulting in more natural-looking photos. The View Max's camera is adequate but lacks the G4's consistency.
Performance
The Motorola Moto G4's Snapdragon 617 chipset with its octa-core processor significantly outperforms the Wiko View Max's Mediatek MT6739WA. The G4's CPU configuration (4x1.5 GHz & 4x1.2 GHz) provides a noticeable boost in multitasking and app loading speeds. The View Max's quad-core processor will feel sluggish by comparison.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G4 shines in this category. Both phones boast an endurance rating of 73h, but the G4's chipset is more power-efficient, allowing it to maintain that endurance more consistently. The 15W wired charging on the Moto G4 is also a plus.
Buying Guide
The Wiko View Max is a good option for users prioritizing a larger screen and a more contemporary aesthetic on a tight budget. The Motorola Moto G4 is ideal for those seeking reliable performance, long battery life, and a proven track record, even if it's a slightly older model.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Motorola Moto G4 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 617 chipset. The Wiko View Max will struggle with demanding games.
❓ Is the Wiko View Max worth considering if I prioritize a large screen?
Yes, if a large screen is your absolute top priority, the View Max might be a viable option. However, be prepared for compromises in performance and camera quality.
