Both the Wiko Tommy3 Plus and the Xiaomi Redmi 7A target the ultra-budget smartphone market, but they take different approaches to achieving affordability. The Tommy3 Plus relies on a Mediatek chipset, while the Redmi 7A leverages Qualcomm's Snapdragon series. This comparison dissects the hardware differences to determine which device delivers the best user experience for the price.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Xiaomi Redmi 7A is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 439 chipset, with its octa-core configuration and more efficient 12nm process, provides a noticeably smoother and more responsive experience than the Wiko Tommy3 Plus's quad-core Mediatek MT6739WA. While both phones are basic, the Redmi 7A offers better future-proofing and usability.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 20 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40 - Global |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019. Released 2019 | 2019, May 24. Released 2019, July 04 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 147.6 x 71.3 x 8.4 mm (5.81 x 2.81 x 0.33 in) | 146.3 x 70.4 x 9.6 mm (5.76 x 2.77 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 150 g (5.29 oz) | 165 g (5.82 oz) |
| | - | Splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.45 inches, 76.7 cm2 (~72.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.45 inches, 76.7 cm2 (~74.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.45 GHz Cortex A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6739WA (28 nm) | Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8100 | Adreno 505 |
| OS | Android 8.1 (Oreo) | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 2GB RAM | 16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | 13 MP, f/2.2, 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF - China
or
12 MP, f/2.2, 1/2.9", 1.25µm, PDAF - Global, India |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2, 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM Radio, built-in antenna |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Languages | Anthracite Matte, Anthracite Mirror, Gold, Cherry | - |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 2900 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | - | Matte Black, Morning blue, Matte Blue, Matte Gold, Gem Red, Gem Blue |
| Models | - | MZB7995IN, M1903C3EG, M1903C3EH, M1903C3EI |
| Price | About 80 EUR | About 130 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.12 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.56 W/kg (head) 1.17 W/kg (body) |
Wiko Tommy3 Plus
- Potentially lower price point (depending on region)
- Compact and lightweight design (likely)
- Simple and easy-to-use interface
- Significantly weaker performance compared to Redmi 7A
- Less efficient chipset leading to potential throttling
- Limited multitasking capabilities
Xiaomi Redmi 7A
- Faster and more responsive performance with Snapdragon 439
- More efficient chipset for better battery life
- Improved multitasking capabilities
- 10W charging support
- May be slightly more expensive than the Wiko Tommy3 Plus
- Still a basic smartphone with limited features
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. Specifics like resolution and brightness are not provided, but the focus here is on performance, not visual fidelity. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, maximizing screen real estate within a compact form factor. Color accuracy is likely to be standard for budget devices, prioritizing power efficiency over color calibration.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, both phones likely feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. The absence of information regarding sensor size or aperture suggests neither device excels in low-light conditions. It's reasonable to assume both include a primary camera and potentially a secondary depth sensor. The Redmi 7A’s image processing, benefiting from Qualcomm’s ISP, may offer slightly better dynamic range and color reproduction, but this is speculative without further data.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi 7A’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (12nm) is a significant upgrade over the Wiko Tommy3 Plus’s Mediatek MT6739WA (28nm). The Snapdragon 439 features an octa-core CPU (4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.45 GHz Cortex A53) compared to the Tommy3 Plus’s quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53. This translates to substantially faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved responsiveness. The 12nm manufacturing process of the Snapdragon 439 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained use. Users who intend to play even light games will find the Redmi 7A a far more enjoyable experience.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified for either device, but both likely house batteries in the 3000-4000 mAh range, common for this segment. The Redmi 7A benefits from 10W wired charging, which, while not fast, is a standard offering. The Tommy3 Plus’s charging speed is unknown, but likely similar. The Snapdragon 439’s improved power efficiency may translate to slightly longer battery life for the Redmi 7A, even with a similar capacity, due to reduced power draw during typical usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko Tommy3 Plus if you absolutely need the lowest possible upfront cost and are only planning to use the phone for very basic tasks like calls and messaging. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 7A if you prioritize a more fluid user experience, occasional multitasking, and the ability to run more demanding apps without significant lag. The Redmi 7A is the better choice for anyone who wants a phone that feels less constrained.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Redmi 7A struggle with popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram?
While the Redmi 7A isn't a powerhouse, its Snapdragon 439 chipset is capable of running Facebook and Instagram smoothly. You might experience some minor lag when scrolling through image-heavy feeds, but overall, the experience should be acceptable for casual use. The Tommy3 Plus will likely struggle more with these apps.
❓ Is the Redmi 7A a good choice for someone who primarily uses their phone for calls and texts?
Yes, the Redmi 7A is an excellent choice for basic communication. The Snapdragon 439 provides more than enough power for calls and texts, and its improved efficiency will contribute to longer battery life. However, if your needs are *strictly* calls and texts, the Wiko Tommy3 Plus might suffice, potentially at a lower cost.
❓ Can the Redmi 7A handle any mobile games?
The Redmi 7A can handle some light mobile games, such as puzzle games or simple arcade titles. However, it will struggle with more demanding games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile, even on the lowest settings. The Tommy3 Plus will have even more difficulty with gaming.
