The smartphone market is overflowing with options, especially in the budget segment. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Wiko T50 and the Samsung Galaxy A51. Both promise a lot for their price, but which one delivers the best overall experience?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A51 wins overall thanks to its superior display brightness, established brand reputation, and significantly faster charging. While the Wiko T50 offers a competitive chipset, the A51's longevity and features make it the better choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - W-P861-01 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 13, 26, 28, 66 - W-P861-01 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 - W-P861-02 | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 - SM-A515U |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 26 | 2019, December 12. Released 2019, December 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 26 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.7 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 158.5 x 73.6 x 7.9 mm (6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 172 g (6.07 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Exynos 9611 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.0 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, AF
8 MP
2 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing
ANT+ |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 40W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Pink | Prism Crush Black, Prism Crush White, Prism Crush Blue, Prism Crush Pink |
| Models | W-P861-01, W-P861-02 | SM-A515F, SM-A515F/DSN, SM-A515F/DS, SM-A515F/DST, SM-A515F/DSM, SM-A515F/N, SM-A515U, SM-A515U1, SM-A515W, SM-A515X, SM-S515DL |
| Price | - | About 100 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.80 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.37 W/kg (head) 1.59 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 4GB RAM | - | $ 299.99 |
| 128GB 6GB RAM | - | $ 674.99 |
| 64GB 4GB RAM | - | $ 211.50 |
| RENEWED | - | £ 179.00 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.1dB / Crosstalk -87.3dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 86h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.6 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 113051 (v7), 175363 (v8)
GeekBench: 5401 (v4.4), 1294 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 5.6fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Wiko T50
- Competitive gaming performance
- Faster charging (40W)
- Potentially lower price
- Lower display brightness
- Shorter battery life
- Less established brand reputation
- Likely inferior camera quality
Samsung Galaxy A51
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Longer battery life (86h endurance)
- More versatile camera system
- Established brand reputation
- Better software support
- Slower charging (15W)
- Potentially higher price
- Gaming performance slightly behind the T50
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A51 boasts a significantly brighter display (636 nits) compared to the Wiko T50, offering better visibility in sunlight. The A51's 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent color reproduction, while the T50's display, though adequate, lacks the same punch. The A51 also likely has better color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A51 generally has a more versatile camera system with a wider range of features and better image processing. While both phones offer decent camera capabilities, the A51's software optimization and potentially better sensors give it an edge in photo and video quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The A51 also likely has better video stabilization.
Performance
The Wiko T50's Helio G85 chipset is a strong performer for gaming in its price range, potentially offering slightly better raw gaming performance than the A51's Exynos 9611. However, the A51's CPU architecture (Cortex-A73 cores) provides a more balanced performance for everyday tasks and multitasking.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A51 shines here with an impressive endurance rating of 86 hours. The Wiko T50's battery capacity is likely smaller, resulting in shorter battery life. The A51's 15W charging is still slower than the T50's 40W, but the longer battery life compensates for this.
Buying Guide
The Wiko T50 is ideal for users prioritizing gaming performance on a tight budget and who don't mind slower charging. The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a better fit for those seeking a well-rounded experience with a vibrant display, reliable performance, and faster charging, even if it comes at a slightly higher price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Wiko T50 good for gaming?
The Wiko T50's Helio G85 chipset is decent for budget gaming, but don't expect flagship-level performance. It can handle many popular games at medium settings.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
The Samsung Galaxy A51 will likely receive longer software updates and security patches due to Samsung's established support policies.
