The Wiko T50 and Samsung Galaxy A33 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive budget 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity at an accessible price point, they take different approaches to achieving this, particularly in chipset choice and overall feature set. This comparison dives deep into the specifications to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing overall performance and a more refined software experience, the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G is the better choice. Its Exynos 1280 chipset, built on a 5nm process, provides a significant performance advantage over the Wiko T50’s Helio G85, despite the slower 25W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - W-P861-01 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 13, 26, 28, 66 - W-P861-01 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 - W-P861-02 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 26 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 26 | Available. Released 2022, April 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.7 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 159.7 x 74 x 8.1 mm (6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, AF
8 MP
2 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 40W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Pink | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | W-P861-01, W-P861-02 | SM-A336E, SM-A336B, SM-A336B/DS, SM-A336B/DSN, SM-A336E/DS, SM-A336M, SM-A3360 |
| Price | - | £ 174.99 / € 187.50 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.35 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 1.59 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 104h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 354420 (v8), 394918 (v9)
GeekBench: 1900 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Wiko T50
- Faster 40W charging
- Potentially lower price point
- 5G connectivity
- Less powerful Helio G85 chipset
- Less detailed display specifications
- Likely inferior camera performance
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
- More powerful Exynos 1280 chipset
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Samsung’s established software and support
- Slower 25W charging
- Potentially higher price
- Similar battery endurance to Wiko T50
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A33 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 728 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Wiko T50. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for AMOLED/OLED panels), the A33’s superior brightness is a key advantage. The Wiko T50’s display specifications are less detailed, suggesting a potentially lower-quality panel, impacting color accuracy and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. The A33 likely benefits from Samsung’s established image processing algorithms and potentially a larger main sensor (though not specified). The Wiko T50’s camera system is likely more basic, focusing on affordability rather than advanced features. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the Wiko T50 is a common budget tactic, but its utility is limited due to the low resolution and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A33 5G’s Exynos 1280 (5nm) utilizes Cortex-A78 cores, offering a substantial performance uplift over the Wiko T50’s MediaTek Helio G85 (12nm) and its Cortex-A75 cores. The 5nm fabrication process of the Exynos 1280 also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads. While both are octa-core CPUs, the A33’s architecture is more modern and efficient, resulting in a noticeably smoother user experience, especially in demanding applications and games.
Battery Life
Both the Wiko T50 and Samsung Galaxy A33 5G achieve an endurance rating of 104 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the Wiko T50 compensates for a potentially smaller battery capacity with 40W wired charging, significantly faster than the A33’s 25W charging. This means the Wiko T50 can replenish its battery much quicker, reducing downtime. While the A33’s endurance is comparable, the faster charging of the T50 is a practical advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko T50 if you need a phone primarily for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and 40W fast charging is a high priority. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for gaming, multitasking, and photography, and value Samsung’s established brand and software support.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1280 in the Galaxy A33 5G tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 1280, built on a 5nm process, is generally efficient and manages heat well. While some throttling may occur during extremely demanding games over extended periods, it's unlikely to cause significant performance drops or discomfort. The larger surface area of the A33 also aids in heat dissipation compared to the more compact Wiko T50.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on the Wiko T50 actually useful for taking detailed close-up photos?
Unfortunately, the 2MP macro camera on the Wiko T50 is likely to deliver limited results. The low resolution and lack of optical image stabilization mean images will likely lack detail and sharpness. It's primarily a marketing feature and shouldn't be a deciding factor in your purchase.
❓ Can the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G reliably maintain 60fps in popular games like PUBG Mobile?
Yes, the Exynos 1280 in the Galaxy A33 5G is capable of maintaining 60fps in PUBG Mobile at medium to high graphics settings. While achieving maximum settings may result in some frame drops, the A33 provides a significantly smoother gaming experience than the Wiko T50’s Helio G85.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Wiko T50 with the 40W charger?
With 40W charging, the Wiko T50 should be able to charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 60-75 minutes, depending on usage during charging. This is considerably faster than the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G’s 25W charging, which will likely take around 90-120 minutes for a full charge.
