Wiko T50 vs. Realme 9 Pro: A Detailed Comparison of Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and smoother performance, the Realme 9 Pro is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, offers a noticeable advantage over the Wiko T50’s Helio G85, despite the slightly slower 33W charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Wiko T50 | Realme 9 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - W-P861-01 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 13, 26, 28, 66 - W-P861-01 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 - W-P861-02 | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 26 | 2022, February 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 26 | Available. Released 2022, February 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 160.7 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 164.3 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, AF 8 MP 2 MP | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 40W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Pink | Midnight Black, Aurora Green, Sunrise Blue |
| Models | W-P861-01, W-P861-02 | RMX3471, RMX3472 |
| Price | - | € 248.86 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.71 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 134h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1601:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 401894 (v9) GeekBench: 2020 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Wiko T50
- Faster 40W charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable MediaTek Helio G85 performance for everyday tasks
- Less efficient 12nm chipset
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Potentially inferior display quality
Realme 9 Pro
- 5G connectivity with Snapdragon 695
- Brighter and potentially more accurate display
- More efficient 6nm chipset for sustained performance
- Slower 33W charging
- Potentially higher price
- Camera details are lacking
Display Comparison
Both the Wiko T50 and Realme 9 Pro share a 1601:1 contrast ratio, indicating similar dynamic range. However, the Realme 9 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 567 nits. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both lack high refresh rates, the Realme 9 Pro’s superior brightness and potentially better color calibration (though not specified) provide a more enjoyable viewing experience. The absence of information on panel type for the Wiko T50 makes a direct comparison of color accuracy difficult, but Realme’s focus on display quality generally suggests an advantage.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is challenging. However, Realme generally invests more in camera technology, suggesting a potentially more refined image processing pipeline. The Wiko T50’s camera system is likely geared towards basic photography, while the Realme 9 Pro may offer more advanced features and better low-light performance. The absence of details on optical image stabilization (OIS) on either device suggests both rely on software stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme 9 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, fabricated on a 6nm process, offers a clear architectural advantage over the Wiko T50’s MediaTek Helio G85 (12nm). The Snapdragon 695 utilizes Kryo 660 Gold and Silver cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 1.7 GHz respectively, while the Helio G85 features Cortex-A75 and A55 cores at 2.0 GHz and 1.8 GHz. The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon 695 results in improved power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling, crucial for sustained performance. This means the Realme 9 Pro will likely maintain higher frame rates for longer periods during gaming and demanding applications. The 5G modem within the Snapdragon 695 is another significant benefit, offering future-proof connectivity.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 134 hours, indicating similar overall battery life under typical usage. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The Wiko T50 supports 40W wired charging, while the Realme 9 Pro is limited to 33W. This means the Wiko T50 will likely charge from 0-100% faster, potentially in under an hour. Despite the faster charging, the Realme 9 Pro’s more efficient chipset may offset this advantage by consuming less power during use, resulting in comparable real-world battery longevity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko T50 if you need a reliable daily driver with fast 40W charging and aren't heavily invested in 5G connectivity or demanding mobile gaming. Buy the Realme 9 Pro if you prioritize 5G access, a brighter and more color-accurate display, and a chipset capable of handling more intensive tasks and future software updates with greater ease.