The Wiko T50 and Oppo Reno7 Lite represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive budget 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a modern smartphone experience without breaking the bank, they take different approaches to achieving this goal. The Wiko T50 prioritizes fast charging, while the Oppo Reno7 Lite leverages a more efficient chipset and a brighter display. This comparison will dissect their key differences to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around performance and a brighter viewing experience, the Oppo Reno7 Lite emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset, built on a 6nm process, offers superior efficiency and 5G connectivity, offsetting the slightly slower 33W charging compared to the Wiko T50’s 40W.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - W-P861-01 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 13, 26, 28, 66 - W-P861-01 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 - W-P861-02 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 26 | 2022, April 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 26 | Available. Released 2022, June |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 160.7 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| | - | IPX4, dust and water resistant
RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, AF
8 MP
2 MP | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 40W wired | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Pink | Cosmic Black, Champagne Silver |
| Models | W-P861-01, W-P861-02 | CPH2343 |
| Price | - | About 350 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 125h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.5 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 315250 (v8), 376819 (v9)
GeekBench: 1996 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Wiko T50
- Faster 40W wired charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Quick top-up times
- Less efficient Helio G85 chipset
- No 5G connectivity
- Likely lower display brightness
Oppo Reno7 Lite
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- Brighter 657 nit display
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Slower 33W wired charging
- Potentially higher price point
- Charging time of 63 minutes to full
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno7 Lite boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 657 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Wiko T50. This difference is crucial for outdoor visibility. While both displays likely utilize LCD technology given their price points, the Reno7 Lite’s higher peak brightness provides a more comfortable viewing experience in direct sunlight. Contrast ratio is listed as infinite (nominal) for the Reno7 Lite, a typical marketing claim for LCDs, but the lack of specific display details for the Wiko T50 makes a direct comparison difficult. The Reno7 Lite’s brightness advantage will be particularly noticeable for media consumption and gaming.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without information on sensor size, aperture, or image stabilization (OIS), a meaningful comparison is challenging. It’s reasonable to assume both phones feature a primary camera and potentially multiple secondary sensors, but the quality will likely vary significantly. Given Oppo’s history of strong camera performance, even in budget devices, the Reno7 Lite likely benefits from more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality, serving primarily as a marketing feature.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno7 Lite’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) offers a clear advantage over the Wiko T50’s MediaTek Helio G85 (12nm). The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon 695 translates to significantly better power efficiency and thermal management. While both CPUs feature octa-core configurations, the Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores (2x2.2 GHz) are architecturally more advanced than the Helio G85’s Cortex-A75 cores (2x2.0 GHz). This results in faster single-core performance and improved responsiveness. The Snapdragon 695 also integrates a 5G modem, providing future-proof connectivity, a feature absent in the Wiko T50. The Reno7 Lite will handle multitasking and moderately demanding games with greater ease.
Battery Life
Both the Wiko T50 and Oppo Reno7 Lite achieve an endurance rating of 125 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite differing charging capabilities. However, the Wiko T50’s 40W wired charging is faster than the Reno7 Lite’s 33W wired charging, achieving 31% charge in 15 minutes and 100% in 63 minutes. The Reno7 Lite also supports PD (Power Delivery) and reverse wired charging, adding versatility. While the Wiko T50 offers quicker top-ups, the Snapdragon 695’s efficiency in the Reno7 Lite may offset this advantage in real-world usage, especially for users who don’t frequently deplete their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko T50 if you absolutely need the fastest possible charging speeds and are less concerned with sustained performance during demanding tasks. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their phones throughout the day. Buy the Oppo Reno7 Lite if you value a brighter, more visible display, smoother multitasking, and 5G connectivity for future-proofing, even if it means slightly longer charging times. This phone is better suited for users who stream video, play mobile games occasionally, and want a more refined user experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Oppo Reno7 Lite get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 695 is built on a 6nm process, which inherently generates less heat than the 12nm Helio G85 in the Wiko T50. While some heat is inevitable during prolonged gaming, the Reno7 Lite’s chipset and thermal design should manage temperatures effectively, preventing significant throttling and maintaining consistent performance.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Oppo Reno7 Lite significantly slower than the 40W charging on the Wiko T50 in real-world use?
While the Wiko T50 charges faster initially, the difference in charging speed becomes less noticeable over time. The Reno7 Lite’s 33W charging still provides a full charge in 63 minutes, which is reasonable. Furthermore, the Snapdragon 695’s power efficiency means you may not need to charge as frequently, mitigating the impact of the slower charging speed.
❓ How important is 5G connectivity on the Oppo Reno7 Lite, and will I actually benefit from it?
5G connectivity on the Reno7 Lite future-proofs the device for faster mobile data speeds as 5G networks become more widespread. Whether you’ll immediately benefit depends on your location and carrier coverage. However, even if 5G isn’t available now, having the capability ensures the phone remains relevant for longer.
