Wiko T50 vs. OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 695 chipset, built on a 6nm process, offers superior performance and efficiency compared to the Wiko T50’s Helio G85. While the Wiko boasts faster 40W charging, the OnePlus’s overall package delivers a smoother, more future-proof experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Wiko T50 | OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - W-P861-01 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 13, 26, 28, 66 - W-P861-01 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 - W-P861-02 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 26 | 2022, April 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 26 | Available. Released 2022, April 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.7 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 164.3 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, AF 8 MP 2 MP | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 40W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Pink | Black Dusk, Blue Tide |
| Models | W-P861-01, W-P861-02 | CPH2381, CPH2409 |
| Price | - | About 220 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.71 W/kg (body) |
Wiko T50
- Faster 40W wired charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Decent performance for basic tasks
- Less efficient Helio G85 chipset
- Likely inferior gaming performance
- Potentially lower image quality
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Smoother overall performance
- Better gaming capabilities
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Slower 33W wired charging
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common cost-saving measure in this segment. The key difference lies under the hood: display driver efficiency. While specific display specs (resolution, refresh rate) are missing, the Snapdragon 695’s integrated display engine is generally more power-efficient, potentially leading to slightly better battery life during video playback on the OnePlus. Bezels are likely comparable, reflecting the budget nature of both devices.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Snapdragon 695’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) generally offers superior image processing capabilities compared to the Helio G85’s. This translates to better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality, especially in low-light conditions. It’s reasonable to assume both phones will include a primary camera and potentially depth/macro sensors, but the OnePlus is likely to deliver more consistent and detailed photos. The absence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization, where the Snapdragon’s processing power will again provide an edge.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) is a clear upgrade over the Wiko T50’s MediaTek Helio G85 (12nm). The 6nm process node translates to significantly improved power efficiency and thermal management. While both CPUs feature an octa-core configuration, the Snapdragon’s Kryo 660 Gold cores (2x2.2 GHz) offer a performance advantage over the Helio G85’s Cortex-A75 cores (2x2.0 GHz). This means faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience on the OnePlus, particularly noticeable in graphically intensive games. The Snapdragon 695 also benefits from a more modern GPU, further widening the performance gap.
Battery Life
The Wiko T50’s 40W wired charging is its headline battery feature, promising significantly faster top-up times than the OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G’s 33W charging. While exact battery capacities are unknown, the faster charging speed will be appreciated by users who frequently need a quick power boost. However, the Snapdragon 695’s superior power efficiency means the OnePlus is likely to offer comparable, or even better, real-world battery life despite the slower charging. The 6nm process node reduces power consumption during both active use and standby, offsetting the charging speed difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko T50 if you prioritize extremely fast charging and frequently top up your phone throughout the day, and are less concerned with sustained performance during demanding tasks. Buy the OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G if you value a more efficient processor for smoother multitasking, better gaming performance, and a more refined software experience, even if it means slightly slower charging speeds.