The Wiko T50 and Honor X8c represent compelling options in the crowded sub-$200 smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price, they take different approaches to achieving this. The Wiko T50 prioritizes faster charging, while the Honor X8c leverages a more efficient chipset. This comparison dives deep into the specifications to determine which device offers the best overall value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-term performance and efficiency, the Honor X8c emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 685, built on a 6nm process, provides a noticeable advantage in power efficiency and sustained performance compared to the Wiko T50’s Helio G85. While the Wiko T50’s 40W charging is faster, the X8c’s chipset offers a smoother daily experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - W-P861-01 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 13, 26, 28, 66 - W-P861-01 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 - W-P861-02 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 26 | 2025, January 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 26 | Available. Released 2025, January 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 160.7 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 161.1 x 74.6 x 7.1 mm (6.34 x 2.94 x 0.28 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 174 g (6.14 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 2800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 15, MagicOS 9 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, AF
8 MP
2 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP | 50 MP, f/2.1, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0/5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 40W wired | 35W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Pink | Marrs Green, Midnight Black, Moonlight White, Cloud Purple |
| Models | W-P861-01, W-P861-02 | ABR-LX1, ABR-LX2, ABR-LX3 |
| Price | - | € 190.78 / $ 213.42 / £ 159.00 |
Wiko T50
- Faster 40W wired charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Decent CPU clock speeds for basic tasks
- Less efficient 12nm chipset
- Likely lower sustained performance
- Potentially inferior image processing
Honor X8c
- More efficient 6nm Snapdragon 685 chipset
- Better sustained performance and multitasking
- Superior image processing capabilities
- Slower 35W charging
- Potentially slightly higher price
- May not be ideal for extremely heavy gaming
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common cost-saving measure in this segment. The key difference lies under the hood: chipset efficiency impacts how effectively the display can be powered. While specific display specs (resolution, brightness) are missing, the Snapdragon 685’s 6nm process allows for more efficient power delivery to the display, potentially resulting in slightly better battery life during video playback on the Honor X8c. Bezels are expected to be comparable, typical of this price range.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, it’s safe to assume both phones feature a primary camera and supporting lenses (likely a depth or macro sensor). The image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 685 generally offers superior image processing capabilities compared to the Helio G85’s ISP. This translates to better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Honor X8c is likely to produce more consistently pleasing photos. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is unlikely on either device at this price point.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor X8c’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (6nm) is a significant upgrade over the Wiko T50’s MediaTek Helio G85 (12nm). The 6nm process inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and improved sustained performance. While the Wiko T50’s CPU features two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz, the Honor X8c counters with four Cortex-A73 cores at 2.8 GHz. The A73, despite being an older architecture, benefits from the more efficient manufacturing process. This means the X8c will likely handle demanding tasks and multitasking more smoothly, and for longer periods, before experiencing throttling. The GPU performance will also favor the Snapdragon 685.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified, but the efficiency of the Snapdragon 685 in the Honor X8c will likely result in longer real-world battery life compared to the Wiko T50, despite the latter’s faster 40W charging. The Wiko T50’s 40W charging will significantly reduce charging times – likely achieving a 0-100% charge in under an hour. The Honor X8c’s 35W charging is still respectable, but will take longer. However, the X8c’s more efficient chipset means you may not need to charge it as frequently.
Buying Guide
Buy the Wiko T50 if you absolutely need the fastest possible charging speeds and frequently find yourself needing to top up your battery quickly. It’s a good choice for users who prioritize convenience over sustained performance. Buy the Honor X8c if you value a more efficient processor for smoother multitasking, longer battery life during moderate use, and a potentially more stable software experience due to Qualcomm’s chipset optimization.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 685 in the Honor X8c handle popular games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 685 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with a stable frame rate. While it won't deliver a flagship gaming experience, the 6nm process helps prevent significant throttling during extended gaming sessions, offering a more consistent experience than the Wiko T50’s Helio G85.
❓ How much faster is the 40W charging on the Wiko T50 compared to the 35W charging on the Honor X8c?
The Wiko T50’s 40W charging will likely shave off around 15-20 minutes from a full 0-100% charge compared to the Honor X8c. However, the Honor X8c’s superior battery efficiency means you may not need to charge as often, mitigating the slower charging speed.
❓ Is the difference in CPU architecture (Cortex-A75 vs Cortex-A73) significant in real-world use?
While the Cortex-A75 cores in the Wiko T50 have a higher clock speed, the Cortex-A73 cores in the Honor X8c benefit from the more efficient 6nm manufacturing process. This results in better sustained performance and less heat generation, making the X8c feel smoother and more responsive during everyday tasks and multitasking.
